Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of a rectal cancer followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Daigo Kobayashi; Mariko Masubuchi; Tsunenobu Takase; Takahiro Ichikawa; Tomohiro Deguchi; Toyohisa Yaguchi

doi:10.1186/s40792-018-0526-0

Case Report
Open Access

Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of a rectal cancer followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Daigo Kobayashi¹Email author,
Mariko Masubuchi²,
Tsunenobu Takase²,
Takahiro Ichikawa²,
Tomohiro Deguchi² and
Toyohisa Yaguchi²

Surgical Case Reports20184:123

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-018-0526-0

Received: 15 May 2018
Accepted: 10 September 2018
Published: 26 September 2018

Abstract

Background

Fournier’s gangrene is a necrotizing fasciitis of the genital and perineal region. It may progress, affecting the groin, the thigh, or even the abdominal wall.

Despite adequate treatment (debridement and antibiotics), the mortality rate is very high, reaching 20–35%. Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of a rectal cancer followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy is very rare. We report this case with a review of the literature.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old man visited the emergency room due to perineal pain during which he accepted the chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Abdominal CT scan showed extensive emphysema in the scrotum and gluteus maximus muscle. We diagnosed as Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of a rectal cancer. We performed debridement, left orchiectomy, transverse colostomy with double orifices. Post-operative day 30, we performed abdominoperineal resection. We performed CapeOX therapy eight courses as adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient had no recurrence for 1 year and 2 months after the operation.

Conclusions

Going forward, knowledge gained from this case will increase the opportunity to perform neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. In medical treatment, we must put the possibility of Fournier’s gangrene in mind and treat as soon as possible.

Keywords

Fournier’s gangrene
Locally advanced rectal cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

Fournier’s gangrene is a necrotizing fasciitis of the genital and perineal region. It may progress, affecting the groin, the thigh, or even the abdominal wall.

Despite adequate treatment (debridement and antibiotics), the mortality rate is very high, reaching 20–35% [1]. There has been no report on the onset of Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of a rectal cancer followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We report this case with a review of the literature.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old Japanese man presented at our hospital for evaluation and treatment of rectal cancer. He had no history of rectal cancer. He had been diagnosed with rectal cancer using colonoscopy for screening of rectal bleeding; following biopsy, the tumor was confirmed to be moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Barium enema showed a filling defect at the rectum below the peritoneal reflection (Fig. 1). Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) revealed swollen lateral lymph nodes (Fig. 2). We diagnosed him as having rectal cancer cT4aN1M0 clinical stageIIIa (UICC 8th). We decided to perform neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer for the purpose of the prevention of postoperative local recurrence. We performed CapeOX therapy 1 course until the RAS results were out. Since the RAS gene was confirmed as the wild-type, we changed the regimen and performed FOLFOX + cetuximab therapy 1 course to reduce the tumor size. The reason why we chose cetuximab is we can perform chemotherapy with cetuximab until just before surgery. On day 14, he visited the emergency room due to perineal pain. Physical findings showed BT 38.0 °C, HR 117/min, BP 79/57 mmHg, tenderness, redness, and swelling of the perineum and scrotum (Fig. 3). He had no tenderness of the abdomen. CECT revealed extensive emphysema in the scrotum and gluteus maximus muscle (Fig. 4). We diagnosed as Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of a rectal cancer. We performed debridement, left orchiectomy, transverse colostomy with double orifices. Abscess cultures yielded Escherichia coli. Intravenous antimicrobial treatment was administered using cefmetazole (1 g every 6 h).

Fig. 1
Barium enema showed the apple core sign at the rectum below the peritoneal reflection (arrow)

Fig. 2
a The left-sided lateral lymph nodes were swollen (arrow). b Fat concentration was increased

Fig. 3
The perineum and scrotum was swollen

Fig. 4
Extensive emphysema in the scrotum and gluteus maximus muscle

After the first operation, we cleaned the wound every day. Because his right testis was in poor condition, we performed right orchiectomy under local anesthesia on postoperative day (POD) 7. Once the granulation tissue had formed (Fig. 5), we performed abdominoperineal resection (APR) and dissected the left lateral lymph nodes. on POD30 (Fig. 6). The amount of blood loss was 320 ml, and the operation time was 269 min. Pathological findings were type3, 35 × 30 mm, tub2, ly1, v2, ypT3N1a(263), and M0 Stage IIIa (UICC 8th). Histological grade was 1a (RECIST v1.1). The tumor left side wall was thin. Because the effect of chemotherapy was poor, we diagnosed as Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of rectal cancer.

Fig. 5
Debridement, left orchiectomy, transverse colostomy with double orifices (a). We cleaned the wound every day (b). The granulation tissue was formed (c)

Fig. 6
Resected specimen (a). Histological effect judgment was grade 1a (RECIST v1.1) (b)

After the second operation, we cleaned the wound every day. He left the hospital on POD59. On POD92, the wound was healed like that in the picture (Fig. 7). Since he wanted to leave the hospital, we showed him the treatment procedure for scar healing. We performed CapeOX therapy eight courses as adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient had no recurrence for 1 year and 2 months after the operation.

Discussion

Fournier’s gangrene (FG) is a rare, life-threatening, necrotizing fasciitis that usually involves the perineal or genital areas. It was described by Baurienne in 1764 and formally named by Fournier in 1883 [2]. Prompt identification of this deadly disease is fundamental for appropriate treatment. Despite adequate treatment, the mortality rate is very high, reaching 20–35% [1].

Accepted predisposing factors for FG are poor perfusion (peripheral vascular disease), hypertension, renal insufficiency, trauma, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, smoking, obesity, immunocompromised status, intravenous drug abuse, malignancy, and spinal cord injury [3, 4]. Old age is not a predisposing factor; however, elderly patients with poor self-care and poor nutritional status are more susceptible. Female to male ratio varies significantly. The lower incidence in women is ascribed to better drainage of the perineal region through vaginal secretions [5].

There are three development paths: (1) trauma surrounding the perineum, (2) progress along the muscle membrane surface of the infected urinary tract, and (3) infection of the perianal and retroperitoneum [4].

Treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage to include staphylococci, streptococci, Enterobacteriaceae, and anaerobes should be promptly initiated. However, aggressive surgical management remains the mainstay of treatment. This includes wide excision of all necrotic tissue down to bleeding tissues [6]. Oftentimes, repeated operative debridements may be needed to sufficiently debride all involved tissue.

Although perforation of rectal cancer after treatment with bevacizumab or radiation therapy has been well documented, reports of spontaneous perforation of rectal cancer presenting as FG are rare. There have been some reports on the onset of FG caused by penetration of a rectal cancer followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the world, 35 cases of FG caused by penetration of rectal cancer, including the present case, have been reported (Table 1). The median age in the Japanese group was 61.1 years with a male to female ratio of 31:4. Nine (25.7%) of 35 patients had diabetes mellitus (DM) as a comorbidity. DM was considered a risk factor for FG in the Japanese group as well. Debridement was performed in 32 of 35 patients. It is considered to be essential thorough debridement. Colostomy, including APR and total pelvic exenteration (TPE), was created in 30 of 35 patients. Only five patients were able to avoid a colostomy. With respect to colostomy for FG, this does not have just one point of view [7]. But we considered that colostomy was an effective treatment for FG caused by penetration of rectal cancer or anal canal cancer. Treatment for rectal cancer with FG was APR for 13 patients, TPE for five patients, and chemotherapy alone for six patients. With respect to outcome, seven (20%) patients were dead in the hospital. Seven (20%) patients were treated with preoperative chemotherapy.

Table 1

Clinical data of patients of Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of rectal cancer

Case	Author	Year	Age	Sex	DM	Origin	Histology	1st operation	2nd operation	3rd operation	Preoperative chemotherapy	Outcome
1	Futamura [8]	1995	56	M	−	Rb	tub1	I	D	APR	−	Alive (4 years and 7 months)
2	Nakao [9]	1999	51	M	+	Rab	tub1	D	C		−	Unknown
3	Fujisawa [10]	1999	75	M	−	Rb	Unknown	I	D		−	Death (6 days)
4	Saito [11]	2000	60	M	−	Rab	tub1	D	C	TPE + anaplasty	–	Alive (1 year)
5	Noriyuki [12]	2003	58	M	+	Rab	tub2	I	D + C		−	Alive (1 year and 2 months)
6	Shino[13]	2003	62	M	−	RbP	tub2	I	D + C	APR	−	Alive (3 months)
7	Enomoto[14]	2006	35	M	−	Rab	tub1	D	APR		−	Alive (3 months)
8	Moriwaki [15]	2007	30	M	–	Rab	tub2	I + C	APR	D + anaplasty	–	Death (11 months)
9	Kojima [16]	2007	56	M	+	Rb	tub2	D + C	TPE		−	Alive (4 months)
10	Morohashi [17]	2008	60	M	+	Rb	tub1	D	D + C		–	Death (2 months)
11	Ishibashi [18]	2009	80	F	−	Rb	Unknown	D	Anaplasty		−	Alive (2 months)
12	Suzuki [19]	2009	60s	M	−	Rb	tub1	D	D + C		–	Death (2 months)
13	Moslemi [20]	2009	48	M	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	I + C			–	Alive (unknown)
14	Yamazaki [21]	2010	50s	M	−	Rb	tub2	D	APR	Anaplasty	−	Alive (1 month)
15	Onizuka [22]	2010	55	M	−	Rs-b	Unknown	D	D + C		–	Alive (1 year and 2 months)
16	Tanaka [23]	2010	52	F	+	Rb	muc	D	D + C	APR	−	Alive (5 months)
17	Matsuda [24]	2010	51	M	–	Unknown	Unknown	D	C		–	Death (10 months)
18	Matsuda [24]	2010	69	M	–	Unknown	Unknown	D + C			–	Alive (1 year and 10 months)
19	Watanabe [25]	2013	77	M	−	Rb-P	tub1	D + C			−	Death (70 days)
20	Takahashi [26]	2013	79	M	+	Rab	tub1	D + C	APR + anaplasty		–	Alive (unknown)
21	Momma [27]	2013	79	M	−	Rb-P	Unknown	I	D		+	Alive (1 year)
22	Kawagoe [28]	2014	72	M	−	Rb	Unknown	D	D + C		−	Alive (6 months)
23	Ishikawa [29]	2015	74	M	−	Rb	tub2	D	TPE		−	Alive (4 years 10 months)
24	Tsutsuyama [30]	2015	61	M	−	Rb	tub2	D + C	APR		−	Alive (3 months)
25	Abe [31]	2015	71	F	−	Rb	tub2	D + C	APR		−	Alive (3 years 6 months)
26	Tanaka [32]	2016	67	M	+	Rb	tub2	D + C	APR		−	Alive (1 year)
27	Kuroda [33]	2016	63	M	+	Rb	tub2	D + C	APR		−	Alive (2 years and 9 months)
28	Yoshino [34]	2016	65	M	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	D + C	TPE + anaplasty		−	Alive (108 days)
29	Suzuki [35]	2017	64	M	+	RaRb	tub2	D	APR		−	Death (3 years and 10 months)
30	Koyama [36]	2017	66	M	−	Unknown	Unknown	I			+	Alive (12 days)
31	Koyama [36]	2017	63	M	Unknown	Unknown	muc	I			+	Alive (18 days)
32	Sawayama [37]	2017	66	M	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	D	TPE + anaplasty		+	Alive (unknown)
33	Fukuhisa [38]	2017	73	M	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	D + C			+	Alive (50 days)
34	Pittaka [39]	2018	24	F	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	D			+	Alive (1 year)
35	Our case	2018	68	M	−	Rb	tub2	D+C	APR		+	Alive (1 year and 2 months)

I incision and drainage, D debridement, C colostomy, APR abdominoperineal resection, TPE total pelvic exentration

In our case, we promptly diagnosed as FG caused by penetration of a rectal cancer followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and performed debridement and colostomy as soon as possible. After that, we performed APR and got a good prognosis.

The disease is life-threatening and has a high mortality rate. Therefore, prompt diagnosis and treatment (debridement and antibiotics) is recommended. Going forward, knowledge gained from this case will increase the opportunity to perform neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. In medical treatment, we must put the possibility of Fournier’s gangrene in mind and treat as soon as possible.

Conclusions

We reported the first case of Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of a rectal cancer followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a review of literature.

Abbreviations

APR:: Abdominoperineal resection

CECT:: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography

DM:: Diabetes mellitus

FG:: Fournier’s gangrene

POD:: Post-operative day

TPE:: Total pelvic exenteration

Declarations

Availability of data and materials

We wish to share our data and materials.

Authors’ contributions

DK is involved in this patient’s first and second operation. He also drafted and revised the manuscript. MM was an attending surgeon who was involved in this patient’s management. TT was involved in this patient’s second operation. TI was involved in this patient’s management in hospital days. TD was involved in this patient’s first operation. TY was involved in drafting and revising this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)

Department of Surgery, Komaki City Hospital, 1-20 Joubushi, Komaki Aichi, 485-8520, Japan

(2)

Department of Surgery, Kainan Hospital, 396 Minamihonden, Maegasu-cho, Yatomi Aichi, 498-8502, Japan

References

Chan CC, Williams M. Fournier gangrene as a manifestation of undiagnosed metastatic perforated colorectal cancer. Int Surg. 2013;98:43–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Fournier AJ. Overwhelming gangrene [in French]. Sem Med. 1883;3:345.Google Scholar
Eke N. Fournier’s gangrene: a review of 1726 cases. Br J Surg. 2000;87(6):718–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Jones RB, Hirschmann JV, Brown GS, Tremann JA. Fournier’s syndrome: necrotizing subcutaneous infection of the male genitalia. J Urol. 1979;122(3):279–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Pierlesky EO, Tarik S, Karim IM, Imane T, Said AL, Khalid M, et al. Fournier gangrene: rare complication of rectal cancer. Pan African MJ. 2015;20:288.Google Scholar
Fajdic J, Gotovac N, Hrgovic Z. Fournier gangrene: our approach and patients. Urol Int. 2011;87(2):186–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Basoglu M, Ozbey I, Atamanalp SS, Yildirgan MI, Aydinli B, Polat O, et al. Management of Fournier’s gangrene: review of 45 cases. Surg Today. 2007;37:558–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Futamura N, Kano N, Fukuhara N, Komura Y, Miyamoto K, Maeda H, et al. A case of rectal cancer with Fournier’s gangrene. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1995;56(2):399–402.Google Scholar
Nakao T, Inatsugi N, Yoshikawa S, Takamura H, Masuda T, Nakano H. Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of rectal cancer in an adult. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1999;60(12):3293–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Fujisawa M, Maruyama T, Kojima K, Fukusawa M, Beppu T, Futagawa S. A case of Fournier’s gangrene associated with rectal cancer. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1999;60(6):1583–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Saito C, Yamada A, Kosaka K, Konno M, Toyabe S. A case of Fournier’s gangrene caused by skin perforation due to rectal cancer invasion. J Jpn PRS. 2000;20:31–5.Google Scholar
Noriyuki T, Shimatani K, Shintaku S, Iida M, Moriuchi H, Sakamoto Y, et al. A case of advanced rectal cancer with Fournier’s gangrene. Dig Surg. 2003;26:371–5.Google Scholar
Shiino Y, Ozaki S. A case of an anal canal cancer manifesting as an extended Fournier’s gangrene. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2003;36(11):1641–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Enomoto T, Sumiyama Y, Nagao J, Saita Y, Watanabe M, Asai K, et al. A case of Fournier’s gangrene caused by rectal cancer. J Jpn Coll Surg. 2006;31(2):231–4.Google Scholar
Moriwaki Y, Yamamoto T, Anse M, Sugiyama M. A case of Fournier’s gangrene due to advanced rectal treated by central department including several specialists. JCLS. 2007;62(6):845–8.Google Scholar
Kojima Y, Kamano T, Sakamoto K, Matsuda M, Sengoku H, Takita N, et al. A case of Fournier’s gangrene caused by perforation of rectal carcinoma. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2007;40(4):485–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Morohashi H, Yamada K, Matsuura O, Yamazaki S, Fujita M. A case of Fournier’s gangrene with rectal cancer. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2008;69(7):1823–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ishibashi Y, Ito Y, Wakabayashi K. A case of Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of rectal carcinoma. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2009;70(6):1772–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Suzuki Y, Morohashi H, Yamada K, Matsuura O, Yamazaki S, Fujita M. Two cases of Fournier’s gangrene with rectal cancer. Med J Mutsu Gen Hosp. 2009;14:9–13.Google Scholar
Moslemi MK, Sadighi Gilani MA, Moslemi AA, Arabshahi A. Fournier gangrene presenting in a patient with undiagnosed rectal adenocarcinoma: a case report. Cases J. 2009;2:9136.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Yamazaki T, Goi T, Nakazawa T, Otsuki T, Katayama N, Yamaguchi A. A case of Fournier’s gangrene with rectal cancer. Surgery. 2010;72(10):1125–9.Google Scholar
Onizuka K, Ito S, Tanoue T, Yamauchi M, Yamayoshi T, Kidokawa H. Three cases of Fournier’s gangrene. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2010;71(12):3219–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tanaka N, Tanabe A, Yamamoto J, Kusumoto K. A case of Fournier’s gangrene caused by rectal carcinoma. Jpn J Surg Wound Care. 2010;2:102–6.Google Scholar
Matsuda K, Akahane T, Shimada R, Horiuchi A, Shibuya H, Nakamura K, et al. Fournier’s syndrome. Stomach Intestine. 2010;45(8):1387–91.Google Scholar
Watanabe H, Tonouchi H, Noguchi T, Imaoka H, Yokoe T, Ojima E, et al. A case of Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of rectal carcinoma. J Jpn Soc Surg Infect. 2013;10(1):149–53.Google Scholar
Takahashi K, Tsukamoto S, Takahashi S, Saito M, Ohkohchi N, Hirayama K. A case of Fournier’s gangrene caused by rectal cancer that was reconstructed using a rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2013;71(4):1086–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Momma T, Kikuchi D, Watanabe Y, Onozawa H, Suzuki S, Nakamura I, et al. A case of anal canal cancer which developed Fournier’s syndrome after chemoradiotherapy. J Jpn Soc Coloproctol. 2013;66:358–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kawagoe K, Hamasaki K, Ishikawa H, Fukuoka H, Taniguchi D, Shibuya A, et al. Management of Fournier’s gangrene caused by rectal cancer for early chemotherapy. J Japan Soc Coloproctol. 2014;67:448–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa T, Honma S, Shibasaki S, Kawamura H, Takahashi N, Taketomi A. A long-term relapse free survival case of Fournier’s gangrene by rectal carcinoma. J Jpn Coll Surg. 2015;40(5):938–43.Google Scholar
Tsutsuyama M, Komori K, Kimura K, Kinoshita T, Shimizu Y. Fournier’s gangrene caused by penetration of a rectal cancer with uncontrolled gastric ulcer bleeding. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2015;48(10):862–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Abe K, Kameyama H, Shimada Y, Yamada S, Soma D, Yagi R. A case of rectal carcinoma with recurrence around the drainage site complicated by Fournier’s gangrene. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 2015;42(12):2291–3.Google Scholar
Tanaka H, Suzuki N, Tomochika S, Inoue Y, Kuwahara T, Sakamoto K, et al. Use of a posterior thigh flap with the gluteus maximus for perineal reconstruction-a case of Fournier’s gangrene with rectal cancer. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 2016;43(12):1821–3.Google Scholar
Kuroda M, Ikeda E, Tsuji H, Yokoyama N, Takagi S, Yamano T, et al. A case of rectal cancer with Fournier gangrene. J Abdom Emerg Med. 2016;36(4):797–802.Google Scholar
Yoshino Y, Fukahashi K, Okada R, Miura Y, Suzuki T, Koda T, et al. Severe Fournier’s gangrene in a patient with rectal cancer: case report and literature review. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14(1):234.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Suzuki Y, Hiramatsu S, Seki T, Ikuta Y, Ozaki Y, Arai T. A case of rectal cancer causing Fournier’s gangrene and progressing to septic shock. J Abdom Emerg Med. 2017;37(3):515–9.Google Scholar
Koyama M, Kitazawa M, Ehara T, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki A, Miyagawa Y, et al. Two cases of Fournier’s gangrene that occurred during chemotherapy for rectal cancer. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 2017;44(2):169–71.Google Scholar
Sawayama H, Miyanari N, Sugihara H, Iwagami S, Mizumoto T, Kubota T, et al. A fascia lata free flap in pelvic exentration for Fournier gangrene due to advanced rectal cancer: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2017;3(1):74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Fukuhisa H, Baba K, Kita Y, Tanabe H, Ijichi T, Mori S, et al. A case of Fournier’s gangrene due to perforation of lower rectal cancer during chemotherapy. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2017;44(10):935–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pittaka M, Georgiou C, Polyviou P, Kountourakis P, Loizou P, Constantinou I, et al. Fournier Gangrene in a patient receiving chemo-radiation for rectal cancer. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2018;2018(2):omx101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar