Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case Report
  • Open Access

A rare case of ascending colon adenocarcinoma incarcerated in an inguinoscrotal hernia: case report and literature review

Surgical Case Reports20184:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-018-0457-9

  • Received: 24 April 2018
  • Accepted: 14 May 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Inguinal hernias and colorectal cancers are common conditions, but the presentation of a loop of bowel containing cancer within a hernia is rare. Principles of surgery include oncological resection of the involved colonic segment as well as lymphatic drainage. Based on case reports of the last several decades, there have been no reports of a case where the reduction of an inguinoscrotal hernia and oncological colectomy were performed completely laparoscopically. We present the first instance of a completely laparoscopically assisted resection and hernia repair on a patient with T4 ascending colon cancer. A literature search on recent case reports over the last 30 years has also been presented with a focus on trends in treatment.

Case presentation

An 83-year-old man presented for further investigation of his iron deficiency anaemia and was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon. This was demonstrated radiologically to be found within a large right inguinoscrotal hernia. He underwent a laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy and laparoscopic closure of the internal ring and recovered well.

Conclusions

Colorectal cancers within inguinal hernias are rare and can often present with complications such as perforation. As such, treatment has mostly involved an open operation. The last few years have shown feasibility of a laparoscopic approach and can be attempted safely when indicated.

Keywords

  • Hernia
  • Inguinoscrotal hernia
  • Indirect hernia
  • Ascending colon cancer
  • Incarcerated cancer
  • Incarcerated adenocarcinoma
  • Incarcerated bowel cancer

Background

The combination of inguinal hernia and colorectal cancer is a very uncommon presentation with less than 40 reports found in the literature. Given its rarity, there has been no standard treatment and therefore often presents to the treating team a therapeutic dilemma. We present a rare case of inguinoscrotal hernia containing an ascending colon adenocarcinoma presenting initially as anaemia for further investigation and eventually treated completely laparoscopically. Given the variability in treatment in the literature and the increasing use of laparoscopic techniques since its introduction in the 1990s, we have also included a literature review with a focus on trends in treatment over the last 30 years.

Case presentation

An 83-year-old man on clopidogrel for coronary artery disease presented to the emergency department of our institution with symptoms of anaemia for the past 3 weeks (Table 1) including increasing fatigue and increasing shortness of breath on exertion. He denied any per rectal bleeding or change in bowel habits and had no significant weight loss. He was noted to have a large partially reducible right inguinoscrotal hernia on examination containing bowel (Fig. 1) which he stated had been present for more than 10 years, which had remained unchanged in size in the last few years.
Table 1

Pre-operative blood results

Blood results

Sodium

140 mmol/L

Potassium

5.1 mmol/L

Haemoglobin

74 g/L

Haematocrit

0.244 L/L

Mean cell volume

6.6 fL

Mean cell haemoglobin

21.2 pg

Mean cell haemoglobin concentration

303 g/L

Red cell distribution width

37.2 fL

Iron

3.2 μmol/L

Iron saturation

3.8%

Transferrin

3.4 g/L

Ferritin

4 μg/L

Carcinoembryonic antigen

2 μg/L

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Pre-operative inguinoscrotal hernia. White arrows point to the right-sided inguinoscrotal hernia

His other significant background consisted of hypertension, three previous transient ischaemic attacks, type 2 diabetes mellitus and had a permanent pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome.

Colonoscopy demonstrated a large non-obstructing tumour located at the ascending colon. The tumour was confirmed as adenocarcinoma on histopathology.

Further investigations included a CEA level of 2 μg/L and computed tomography of the chest and abdomen which did not demonstrate metastatic disease but that the ascending colon tumour was located in his right inguinoscrotal hernia (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Computed tomography. a Axial view demonstrating right-sided inguinoscrotal hernia (black arrows) containing large bowel with thickening of the wall representing the ascending colon cancer (white arrows) and herniated terminal ileum (dashed white arrow). b Coronal view demonstrating the right-sided inguinoscrotal hernia (black arrows) with large bowel (white arrows) and terminal ileum (dashed white arrow) herniating through the inguinal canal

He underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The caecal pole was adherent to the scrotal sac, and the adhesion was deemed to be inflammatory related rather than direct invasion from the tumour. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was performed with a moderate degree of difficulty. A 30° laparoscope was used and inserted into the inguinoscrotal hernia for an angled view (Fig. 3). Bowel manipulation was performed with atraumatic graspers, and adhesiolysis was achieved by an energy device (Olympus Thunderbeat™). Further mobilisation followed a standard lateral to medial approach, followed by inferior to superior mobilisation. The omentum was dissected off the transverse colon, lesser sac entered and hepatic flexure to transverse colon was mobilised. The ileocolic pedicle was isolated and stapled, and the diseased colon was delivered through the umbilical port site. A resection and a functional end-to-end anastomosis were performed with the GIA™ 80 mm stapler (Medtronic). Pneumoperitoneum was then re-established, and the deep ring was closed snugly around cord structures with 2-0 V-Loc™ (Medtronic) non-absorbable sutures laparoscopically.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Intra-operative images. a Laparoscopic view of ascending colon (black arrows) herniating through the deep ring (white arrows). b Angled view within the hernial sac (inguinal canal) using the 30° laparoscope, black arrows pointing to adherent ascending colon. c Laparoscopic view of the deep ring (white arrows) with ascending colon (black arrows) and terminal ileum reduced

He had an unremarkable post-op recovery and was discharged home after 7 days. There was no recurrence of the inguinoscrotal hernia at his 4-week post-operative review.

Histopathology confirmed that the ascending colon mucinous adenocarcinoma had invaded partially into serosa with clear resection margins. Four out of 15 lymph nodes were positive. TNM staging was T4aN2aM0 with an R0 resection.

Given the high-risk cancer and poor prognostic features, he is currently being planned for adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy.

Discussion

The incidence of inguinal hernias in the western population is high with an incidence of 1.7% with men accounting for 95% of the presentations [1]. In addition, incidence of colon cancer in the western population is 40 per 100,000 and is currently the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide [2]. However, together, they form a rare entity with only 38 cases (see Appendix 1) with primary colorectal cancer being reported in the literature worldwide, with all but one cases occurring in males who are mostly elderly (mean age = 71.7 years) [3, 4]. Gerhardt in 1938 was the first to report this entity involving the sigmoid colon, and since then most reporters (71.1%) have documented sigmoid involvement. Caecal cancers are the second most likely (15.8%), followed by ascending colon cancers, of which there have been two (5.2%) including this case report. Due to the rarity of this entity, there has been no clear guideline for treating this.

Therefore, and in the context of advances in surgical treatment especially with the introduction of laparoscopically assisted colectomies since the 1990s, we present a literature review of cases over the last 30 years (Table 2). While there has been little difference in mean ages (71.3 years in the earlier group and 72.1 years in the later group), we have found that these patients tend to present as complicated hernias with 8 of 17 (47.1%) being incarcerated, followed by perforation (41.2%), 1 strangulation (5.9%) and 1 uncomplicated hernia (5.9%).
Table 2

Cases of bowel cancer presenting within inguinal hernias in the last 30 years

Year

First Author

No

Sex

Age

Site

Complications

Treatment

Incision

LOS (days)

1991 [13]

Hale

22

M

85

Sigmoid

Incarceration

Hartmann’s + intra-abdominal internal ring closure

Midline laparotomy

NA

2003 [12]

Tan

23

M

62

Sigmoid

Incarceration

High anterior resection + left orchidectomy + intra-abdominal closure of hernial defect

Left iliac fossa transverse

NA

2003 [7]

Kouraklis

24

M

79

Sigmoid

Perforation

Hartmann’s + loop colostomy + interval reversal and open hernioplasty

Left groin

10

2003 [16]

Cervinka

25

M

69

Sigmoid

Incarceration

Sigmoidectomy + anastomosis + defunctioning transverse colostomy + herniorrhaphy (Bassini)

Left groin

NA

2008 [17]

Slater

26

M

66

Sigmoid

Incarceration

Hartmann’s + left orchidectomy + internal ring closure

Left groin + midline laparotomy

NA

2008 [17]

Slater

27

M

73

Sigmoid

Perforation

Hartmann’s + left orchidectomy + internal ring closure

L groin + Left modified Rutherford-Morrison

NA

2009 [18]

Ruiz-Tovar

28

M

67

Sigmoid

Perforation without contamination

Sigmoidectomy and anastomosis + hernioplasty (Lichtenstein)

Left groin + midline laparotomy

7

2010 [19]

Ko

29

M

84

Sigmoid

Perforation

Hartmann’s + herniorrhaphy

Laparotomy

Deceased

2010 [20]

Mai

30

M

83

Sigmoid

Strangulation

Hartmann’s + herniorrhaphy

Lower midline + left groin

NA

2011 [5]

Pernazza

31

M

70

Caecum

Incarceration

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy + herniorrhaphy

Laparoscopy + bilateral groin incisions

5

2012 [6]

Carr

32

M

65

Sigmoid

Incarceration

Laparoscopic high anterior resection + open biosynthetic hernioplasty

Laparoscopy + left groin

4

2013 [21]

Meniconi

33

F

78

Caecum

Incarceration

Open right hemicolectomy + herniorrhaphy

Midline laparotomy + right groin

NA

2013 [22]

Tan

34

M

63

Sigmoid

Perforation

Hartmann’s + herniorrhaphy

Midline laparotomy + left groin

10

2016 [23]

Kulasegaran

35

M

66

Sigmoid

Perforation + necrotising infection

Hartmann’s + debridement + staged skin graft

Left groin + midline laparotomy

NA

2016 [24]

Diao

36

M

48

Transverse colon

Perforation

Transverse colectomy + herniorrhaphy + orchidectomy + partial scrotectomy

Left groin

NA

2017 [25]

Sharma

37

M

84

Caecum

None

Open right hemicolectomy + herniorrhaphy

Right transverse

NA

2018

Current report

38

M

83

Ascending colon

Incarceration

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy + laparoscopic defect closure

Laparoscopy

10

LOS length of stay

Most patients undergoing the procedure had two incisions, one being the initial incision at the hernia site discovering the pathology followed by a midline incision for the oncological resection. Given the high rates of perforation, eight patients (47.1%) had an end colostomy (Hartmann’s operation). Other than this reported case, there have been two attempts at laparoscopic repair, both in incarcerated but non-perforated hernias, with Pernazza et al. [5] performing a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and Carr and O’Dair [6] performing a laparoscopic anterior resection.

Most reports document performing the hernia repairs in the same operation although Kouraklis et al. [7] who had formed a loop colostomy delayed that operation for 6 weeks and performed a mesh repair during the colostomy reversal operation. Citing fears of contamination and risk of mesh infection, 11 reporters (64.7%) have chosen to perform open non-mesh repairs with 2 of these being intra-abdominal defect closures. Of the three mesh repairs, all have been performed in cases without significant risk of sepsis, although there was perforation without contamination in the case reported by Ruiz-Tovar et al.; nonetheless, there were no reported complications. None of the cases had hernias repaired laparoscopically.

Our case is the second known case of inguinoscrotal hernia containing an ascending colon cancer and to our knowledge the first case in which both the bowel resection and hernia repair were performed completely laparoscopically. The decision to perform the procedure laparoscopically was based on several factors.
  1. 1.

    The benefits of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy are well known, and two recent meta-analyses [8, 9] of non-emergent laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomies have demonstrated advantages intraoperatively with reduced blood loss, post-operatively with reduced time to first flatus, reduced length of stay, reduced post-operative pain, reduced rate of wound infections with oncologically similar results, with similar number of lymph nodes taken, length of resection and rates of recurrence. The only disadvantage has been increased operative time.

     
  2. 2.

    While our patient presented to the emergency department, the procedure was carried out electively and was initially investigated endoscopically and thence underwent radiological and biochemical investigations allowing for planning and discussion of the planned elective procedure. Given the benefits of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, we felt that it was in the patient’s best interest to proceed laparoscopically with an option to convert to open if required. This was discussed with the patient who agreed and consented to our approach.

     
  3. 3.

    Given the unusual presentation of the cancer, laparoscopy allowed definition of the disease with minimal trauma and allowed the flexibility of treatment to change if required without committing to a surgical strategy dictated by an open incision.

     
  4. 4.

    Although bowel was incarcerated within the hernia, the defect was thought to be large given the fact that the colonoscope was able to reach the terminal ileum and hence passing through the inguinal canal within bowel. As such, muscle relaxation and pneumoperitoneum might have allowed reduction of the herniated bowel which was previously non-reducible [5].

     

Given the risk of herniation through the large defect, it was also important that the hernial defect was repaired. With our centre’s long experience with laparoscopic hernioplasties, a trans-abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach was considered. As the operation entailed a bowel resection, the wound created was considered clean contaminated, and despite significant reduction in wound infection rates in laparoscopic right hemicolectomies, they remain at 5.3% [9]. Therefore, a TAPP approach was thought to be unfeasible given the risk of a surgical site infection and that the only barrier between mesh and bowel was dissected peritoneum, putting the mesh at risk of contamination and infection potentially resulting in a difficult re-operation to remove the mesh.

An open approach and tissue repair was also considered with the advantage of being able to excise the sac for histopathological analysis although the benefits remain unclear in primary intrasaccular tumours [3]. Given the benefits of laparoscopic hernioplasties with chronic pain [10, 11], it was decided that the hernial defect could feasibly be closed laparoscopically, noting that previous approaches also included open but intra-abdominal closures of the hernial defect or internal ring [12, 13]. This seemed to be a good compromise, and should the hernia recur, the patient could have a laparoscopic hernioplasty electively.

While it has been established that there is no benefit to screening for abdominal cancers endoscopically or radiologically in inguinal hernias [14], any patient presenting with suspicious features such as symptoms of anaemia, per rectal bleeding, weight loss and change in bowel habits should be further investigated.

It has been traditionally advocated that T4 tumours are to be resected using an open approach. Recent data have challenged that and have shown that a laparoscopic approach can be safe and is not significantly inferior to an open approach in terms of oncologic outcomes and at the same time maintaining the key advantages of laparoscopy as previously described [15].

Conclusions

An inguinal hernia containing colorectal cancer is rare but serious and can often present with complications such as perforation. We have presented a case of T4 ascending colon cancer within an inguinoscrotal hernia treated completely laparoscopically. Although the data are limited, laparoscopically assisted bowel resections in this context can be safely performed and could be attempted if feasible.

Abbreviations

LOS: 

Length of stay

TAPP: 

Trans-abdominal preperitoneal approach

Declarations

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

TC, YT and DP were clinicians involved in the inpatient treatment of the patient. TC, YT and DP were all involved in the operation of the patient. TC and YT were involved in gathering clinical data related to the patient. TC wrote the initial manuscript, which was subsequently edited by YT and DP. DP approved the final submission of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Consent has been obtained from the patient to publish clinical data, radiologic imaging and pre-operative and intra-operative pictures for the purposes of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Colorectal Surgery, St George Hospital, 5/61 Port Hacking Road, Sylvania, NSW, 2224, Australia

References

  1. Jenkins JT, O'Dwyer PJ. Inguinal hernias. Br Med J. 2008;336(7638):269–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66(4):683–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Matsumoto G, Ise H, Inoue H, Ogawa H, Suzuki N, Matsuno S. Metastatic colon carcinoma found within an inguinal hernia sac: report of a case. Surg Today. 2000;30(1):74–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boormans JL, Hesp WL, Teune TM, Plaisier PW. Carcinoma of the sigmoid presenting as a right inguinal hernia. Hernia. 2006;10(1):93–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Alfano G, Bascone B, Felicioni F, Ferrari R, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of a carcinoma of the cecum incarcerated in a right groin hernia: report of a case. Surg Today. 2011;41(3):422–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr WR, O’Dair G. A laparoscopic high anterior resection for sigmoid cancer with extraction through incarcerated left inguinal hernia repaired with Permacol mesh. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012.Google Scholar
  7. Kouraklis G, Kouskos E, Gilnavou A, Raftopoulos J, Karatzas G. Perforated carcinoma of the sigmoid colon in an incarcerated inguinal hernia: report of a case. Surg Today. 2003;33(9):707–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ding J, Liao GQ, Xia Y, Zhang ZM, Liu S, Yan ZS. Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2013;23(1):8–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Rondelli F, Trastulli S, Avenia N, Schillaci G, Cirocchi R, Gulla N, et al. Is laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than open resection? A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies. Color Dis. 2012;14(8):e447–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tschudi JF, Wagner M, Klaiber C, Brugger JJ, Frei E, Krahenbuhl L, et al. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice repair. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(11):1263–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, Jansen-Winkeln B, Gockel I. Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg. 2017;17(1):55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Tan GY, Guy RJ, Eu KW. Obstructing sigmoid cancer with local invasion in an incarcerated inguinal hernia. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(1–2):80–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hale DA, Solla JA. Complete colonic obstruction caused by a sigmoid colon cancer incarcerated in an inguinal hernia sac. South Med J. 1991;84(10):1280–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Avidan B, Bardan E, Lang A, Fidder HH, Chowers Y, Bar-Meir S. Colorectal cancer screening in patients presenting with an inguinal hernia: is it necessary? Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59(3):369–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Leon P, Iovino MG, Giudici F, Sciuto A, De Manzini N, Cuccurullo D, et al. Oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic colon cancer resection for T4 lesions: a case-control analysis of 7-years’ experience. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(3):1133–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cervinka A. Surgical images: soft tissue obstructing colon carcinoma in an irreducible scrotal hernia. Can J Surg. 2003;46(5):359–60.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Slater R, Amatya U, Shorthouse AJ. Colonic carcinoma presenting as strangulated inguinal hernia: report of two cases and review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2008;12(3):255–8.Google Scholar
  18. Ruiz-Tovar J, Ripalda E, Beni R, Nistal J, Monroy C, Carda P. Carcinoma of the sigmoid colon in an incarcerated inguinal hernia. Can J Surg. 2009;52(2):E31–2.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ko KH, Yu CY, Kao CC, Tsai SH, Huang GS, Chang WC. Perforated sigmoid colon cancer within an irreducible inguinal hernia: a case report. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11(2):231–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Mai CM, Chen CY, Hsu KF, Hsiao CW, Jao SW, Wu CC. Colonic neoplasm in a strangulated inguinal hernia. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2008;102(5):339–41.Google Scholar
  21. Meniconi RL, Vennarecci G, Lepiane P, Laurenzi A, Santoro R, Colasanti M, et al. Locally advanced carcinoma of the cecum presenting as a right inguinal hernia: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2013;7(206)Google Scholar
  22. Tan A, Taylor G, Ahmed T. Perforated sigmoid colon carcinoma in an irreducible inguinoscrotal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(7):125–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kulasegaran S, Fernando M, Fraser-Jones B, Hammodat H. Perforated sigmoid colon carcinoma within a left inguinal hernia with associated necrotising infection. N Z Med J. 2016;129(1431):93–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Diao K, Ghosh A. Perforated transverse colon cancer presenting as an incarcerated inguinal hernia. Am Surg. 2016;82(11):320–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharma SK. Inguinoscrotal herniation of a caecal adenocarcinoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2017;Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement