- Case report
- Open Access
Minimally invasive resection of synchronous thoracic esophageal and gastric carcinomas followed by reconstruction: a case report
© Honda et al.; licensee Springer. 2015
Received: 26 November 2014
Accepted: 9 January 2015
Published: 4 February 2015
We report on a case of synchronous carcinomas of the esophagus and stomach. A 68-year-old man was referred to our hospital for an abnormality found during his medical examination. Further evaluation revealed squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic lower esophagus and gastric adenocarcinoma located in the middle third of the stomach. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (TSEP), laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with three-field lymph node dissection, and laparoscopically assisted colon reconstruction (LACR) were performed. The patient did not have any major postoperative complications. His pathological examination revealed no metastases in 56 harvested lymph nodes and no residual tumor. He was followed up for 30 months without recurrence. To our knowledge, this is the first report of esophageal and gastric synchronous carcinomas that were successfully treated with a combination of TSEP, LTG, and LACR. These operations may be a feasible and appropriate treatment for this disease.
Minimally invasive surgical techniques for malignancy of the alimentary tract have been established as a treatment for esophageal, gastric, and colonic cancers [1-8]. First, in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma, thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (TSEP) is one of several minimally invasive esophageal surgeries performed to reduce significant surgical complications . TSEP with extended lymphadenectomy is also a feasible and appropriate surgical technique for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma . Second, in the treatment of gastric carcinoma, laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with lymph node dissection is a minimally invasive surgery mainly for early stage gastric cancer in Japan. The incidence of operative complications is the same as that with conventional open surgery. LTG has advantages over open surgery, including earlier recovery, a shorter hospital stay, less pain, and better cosmetics . Finally, in the treatment of colonic cancer, laparoscopic colectomy is widely used in cases of malignancy, which is supported by early data from several large randomized, controlled trials . Thus, a laparoscopic surgical technique involving mobilization of the colon, which is useful in laparoscopically assisted colon reconstruction (LACR), has been established. However, to our knowledge, there is no report on the combination of minimally invasive surgical techniques such as TSEP, LTG, and LACR for treating synchronous carcinomas. Therefore, this is the first case report in which TSEP for early stage esophageal carcinoma, LTG with three-field lymph node dissection for gastric carcinoma, and LACR were performed simultaneously and successfully.
The patient chooses TSEP for clinical stage I esophageal cancer among the therapies of TSEP, chemoradiotherapy or proton therapy, and informed consent was obtained.
Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position
TSEP with mediastinal lymph node dissection involved three steps. First, a dissection of the middle to lower mediastinal lymph nodes was performed. The esophagus was circumferentially mobilized from the descending aorta, pericardium, and the left mediastinal pleura. The vagal trunk was cut below the level of its pulmonary branch, and the thoracic duct was preserved. Second, the procedure transitioned to the upper thorax. The arch of the azygos vein was cut using the linear stapler, and the right recurrent laryngeal nerve was identified just caudal to the right subclavian artery to ensure preservation. The fatty tissue containing lymph nodes around this area was dissected, and the right recurrent laryngeal nerve up to the inferior border of the thyroid gland was preserved. The esophagus was retracted by pulling the taped thread around the upper third of the esophagus, and en bloc dissection of the lymph nodes was performed by using scissors to prevent injury to the left recurrent laryngeal nerve below the aortic arch to the inferior border of the thyroid gland - no electrical or heat-producing devices were used. Finally, after the upper third of the esophagus was mobilized circumferentially, the esophagus was divided at the level of the arch of the azygos vein by linear stapling, and the esophagus was dissected by exposing the left side of the mediastinal pleura by retracting the anal stump. After complete mobilization of the esophagus, the subcarinal and bilateral bronchial lymph nodes were dissected completely. After the thoracoscopic procedures were completed, a chest tube was inserted.
Laparoscopic total gastrectomy
Laparoscopically assisted colon reconstruction
Five chest trocar incisions, a 4-cm mini-laparotomy in the middle of the abdomen, and another seven abdominal trocar incisions were required. The operation was 545 min long, and blood loss was 95 g. Postoperatively, the patient did not have any major complications. However, there was a paralytic ileus, which was relieved using conservative treatment with an ileus tube. The pathological examination revealed no metastases in 56 harvested lymph nodes and no residual tumor. He was discharged 29 days postoperatively and was followed up for 30 months without any indications of recurrence or distant metastases.
For esophageal invasive carcinoma, open transthoracic esophagectomy is accepted as the best oncologic operation , partly because it allows the most extensive lymphadenectomy . However, conventional transthoracic esophagectomy and transhiatal esophagectomy have high rates of morbidity (50%) and mortality (10%) . Therefore, minimally invasive techniques, such as the combination of open surgery with either thoracoscopy or laparoscopy, are being used to reduce these complications [18,19].
A large systematic review reiterated that evidence is still lacking to confirm any real benefit in terms of long-term outcome, safety, and oncological quality with minimally invasive techniques [20,21]. However, our group reported a pilot study of the technical and oncological feasibility of TSEP for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma. In the present case, TSEP with mediastinal lymph node dissection was performed with no residual tumor and no thoracic complications.
Regardless, in the treatment of early gastric carcinoma, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy have been demonstrated in many clinical studies [22-24]. An increasing number of laparoscopic gastrectomies are currently being performed, especially in Eastern countries, which have high incidences of gastric carcinoma. For treating early gastric carcinoma with ulceration in the distal third of the stomach, distal gastrectomy with D1 or D1+ lymph node dissection is standard in Japan . Yet, esophagectomy and distal gastrectomy were required for the double carcinomas in the present case, and total gastrectomy was performed. We used five ports in the upper or middle abdomen for LTG with D1+ lymph node dissection; however, the procedure for mobilizing the right colon was very difficult using just those ports, so additional three ports were added in the lower abdomen (Figure 3).
To our knowledge, there is only one case report on laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with colonic reconstruction for the treatment of a large esophagogastric carcinoma involving the gastric body and distal esophagus . Therefore, this is the first report on synchronous carcinomas of the esophagus and stomach which were successfully treated using endoscopic surgeries (i.e., TSEP for esophageal carcinoma, LTG for gastric carcinoma, and LACR).
In summary, we describe the first case of esophageal and gastric synchronous carcinomas treated using TSEP, LTG, and LACR. This operation can be used in patients with early stage cancers, because in our experience, it is feasible and appropriate.
- Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart Jr RW, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:655–62. discussion 62–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:44–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- [No authors listed]. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy is as safe and effective as open colectomy in people with colon cancer Abstracted from: Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand HS, et al. for the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350:2050–2059. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004; 30:707–9Google Scholar
- Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, Nakamura K, Hiki N, Saka M, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer. 2010;13:238–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:486–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Biere SS, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:121–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jarral OA, Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Hanna GB, Zacharakis E. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2095–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daiko H, Nishimura M. A pilot study of the technical and oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection in the prone position for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:673–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiraishi N, Yasuda K, Kitano S. Laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2006;9:167–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee JK, Delaney CP, Lipman JM. Current state of the art in laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: update on the multi-centric international trials. Annals Surg Innov Res. 2012;6:5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:113–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sakaguchi Y, Ikeda O, Toh Y, Aoki Y, Harimoto N, Taomoto J, et al. New technique for the retraction of the liver in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2532–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, Decaluwe H, Nafteux P, Van Raemdonck D, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35:13–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mariette C, Piessen G, Triboulet JP. Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:545–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH, Rentz JJ, Neumayer LA, Pappas TN, et al. Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:217–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486–94. discussion 94–5.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight Jr JE. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:920–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Law S. Minimally invasive techniques for oesophageal cancer surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:925–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gemmill EH, McCulloch P. Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1461–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg. 2007;245:68–72.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, Takemura M, Tanaka Y, Fujiwara Y, et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: experience with more than 600 cases. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1161–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, et al. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2008;248:721–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen TN, Hinojosa M, Fayad C, Gray J, Murrell Z, Stamos M. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with colonic interposition. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:2120–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.