Skip to main content

Intraoperative severe gastric venous congestion during total pancreatectomy with replaced common hepatic artery: a case report

Abstract

Background

Gastric venous congestion (GVC) is one of the complications of total pancreatectomy (TP). Here, we report a case of intraoperative severe GVC during TP with a replaced common hepatic artery (RCHA).

Case presentation

A 65-year-old female patient was diagnosed with intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma. Her CHA branched from the superior mesenteric artery as RCHA. She underwent subtotal stomach preserving TP. The tumor was resected with splenic artery (SpA) and total gastric vein transections. Severe GVC and bleeding from the stomach tube occurred intraoperatively. A strong pulsation was observed in the left gastric artery (LGA), and we suspected an increased blood flow from the celiac artery (CeA) to the LGA after SpA resection. Total gastrectomy (TG) was then performed to control the severe GVC-related bleeding. The patient was discharged without complications 19 days postoperatively.

Conclusion

TP with RCHA may increase the risk of severe GVC due to increased blood flow from CeA to LGA.

Background

Total pancreatectomy (TP) is a surgical procedure for patients with pancreatic diseases [1]. TP results in gastric venous congestion (GVC) at 5.3–27.9% of cases [2] [3] [4]. Additionally, GVC with TP demonstrated a high mortality rate (7.4%) [4]. We report a case of intraoperative severe GVC during TP with a replaced common hepatic artery (RCHA).

Case presentation

A 65-year-old female patient with no medical history had been observed for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) with main pancreatic duct dilation in the pancreatic body and tail at the local hospital for a few years. She was suspected with a malignant pancreatic tumor and visited our hospital. Laboratory data on hospital admission included white blood cell counts of 6500/μl, red blood cell count of 506 × 104/μl, hemoglobin of 13.7 g/dl, hematocrit of 42.1%, platelets of 25.4 × 104/μl, total protein of 7.4 g/dl, albumin of 4.4 g/dl; total bilirubin of 0.77 mg/dl, aspartate aminotransferase of 26 IU/l, alanine aminotransferase of 25 IU/l, alkaline phosphatase of 68 IU/l, γ-glutamyl transferase of 20 IU/l, amylase of 15 U/l, creatine kinase of 44 IU/l, lactate dehydrogenase of 278 IU/l, blood urea nitrogen of 14 mg/dl, creatinine of 0.65 mg/dl, Na of 140 mEq/dl, K of 4.3 mEq/dl, Cl of 103 mEq/dl, C-reactive protein of 0.25 mg/d, carcinoembryonic antigen of 1.7 ng/ml, CA19-9 of 109.1 U/ml, DUPAN-2 of 79 U/ml, and SPAN-1 of 17 U/ml. Computed tomography (CT) detected a mass of approximately 3 cm in the pancreatic body, dilation of the main pancreatic duct, and a cystic structure suspected of IPMN in the pancreatic tail. The tumor was in contact with the splenic artery (SpA) and left gastric vein (LGV) but was not in contact with the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or celiac artery (CeA) (shown in Fig. 1a, b). An evaluation of the arteries based on three-dimensional pictures revealed the RCHA originating from the SMA (shown in Fig. 1c). Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a high-intensity signal in the mass of the pancreatic body with a diffusion-weighted image (shown in Fig. 1d). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration detected adenocarcinoma. The patient was then diagnosed with intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma cT2N0M0StageIB (UICC 8th) and planned to undergo surgery. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was not appropriate as a curative procedure because the tumor was located in the body of the pancreas and was also suspected to be invading the SpA. So, we decided to perform a distal pancreatectomy (DP) with the SpA dissection. In the surgical findings, the tumor was contact with the SpA and the LGV. Intraoperative ultrasound was used to confirm the extent of the tumor and right gastroepiploic vein (RGEV) was transected because it closed to the right edge of the tumor. DP was performed with resecting the pancreas at the left end of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA). The intraoperative frozen section diagnosis indicated residual cancer at the pancreatic stump of DP, and we decided to perform the subtotal stomach preserving TP (SSPTP) because additional pancreatic resection was deemed impossible. The right gastric vein (RGV) was determined to be very thin and ineffective as a drainage vein and therefore could not be preserved when performing SSPTP. In summary, SpA, LGV, left gastroepiploic artery, left gastroepiploic vein, short gastric artery, short gastric vein, and RGEV were transected during the DP, and RGV, right gastric artery and right gastroepiploic artery were transected during the change to SSPTP, so no gastric drainage veins could be preserved and only the left gastric artery (LGA) supplied blood flow to the stomach. Immediately after the specimen has been extracted, a GVC and massive bleeding from the nasogastric tube occurred. Strong pulsation in the LGA was observed, and we suspected increased blood flow in the LGA after the resection the SpA. Gastric vein reconstructions were technically impossible; thus, a partial gastrectomy was performed to remove the particularly congested pyloric region of the remnant stomach. However, the GVC and bleeding demonstrated no improvement. We determined the necessity of LGA dissection to control the bleeding with the severe GVC and performed total gastrectomy (TG) to avoid postoperative gastric necrosis. The patient was discharged from the hospital 19 days postoperatively without complications. Pathological diagnosis included pancreatic adenocarcinoma, wel > por > mod, Pb, TS2(25 mm), infiltrative type, sci, INFc, ly1, v1, ne3, mpd0, pCH0, pDU0, pS1, pRP1, pPV0, pA0, pPLX, pOO0, pBCM0, pDPM1, R1, pN1(3/27), M0, pT2N1M0StageIIB (UICC 8th) (shown in Fig. 2a, b, c). Adjuvant chemotherapy was not administered due to her intension and physical condition. The patient had a local recurrence around the superior mesenteric vein and SMA 3 months postoperatively and started chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Additionally, she changed the chemotherapy to FOLFIRINOX because of peritoneal dissemination 11 months postoperatively. She then currently continues her treatment 18 months postoperatively. She also received dietary therapy, insulin treatment, and lipase supplementation of the pancrelipase postoperatively, with serum albumin levels of 3.0 g/dl, 3.5 g/dl, and 3.0 g/dl, respectively, at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the case. a The enhanced CT detected the pancreatic body tumor and main pancreatic duct dilation in the pancreatic body and tail. The arrows indicated that the tumor was in contact with splenic artery (SpA). b The enhanced CT shows that the tumor was in contact with the left gastric vein (LGV). The arrows indicated the LGV. c Three-dimensional artery image from enhanced CT. Celiac artery (CeA), left gastric artery (LGA), SpA, superior mesenteric artery (SMA), replaced common hepatic artery (RCHA), left hepatic artery (LHA), right hepatic artery (RHA), gastroduodenal artery (GDA) and right gastric artery (RGA) were indicated. d MRI diffusion-weighted image revealed high intensity in the pancreatic body. The arrow indicated the tumor

Fig. 2
figure 2

The images of resection specimens of the case. a, b Distal pancreatectomy (DP) was performed and the tumor was detected in the pancreatic body. The intraoperative frozen section diagnosis revealed residual cancer at the pancreatic stump. The arrows indicated the tumor. c The subtotal stomach preserving TP (SSPTP) was performed (pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed adding to DP)

Discussion

In this case, RCHA branches off from SMA. A variant origin of CHA arising from either SMA or the aorta was reported in 4.0% of patients [5]. In cases with RCHA, the CeA branches only into the SpA and LGA. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta generally increases the arterial blood flow in patients with traumatic shock by blocking peripheral arteries [6]. It was also reported that an embolization of SpA had increased hepatic arterial blood flow in patients with splenic hepatic artery steal syndrome [7] [8]. Thus, SpA transection should significantly increase the blood flow from the CeA to the LGA in the case with RCHA. The increased blood flow of the LGA may then cause severe GVC.

Gastrectomy was one of the procedures to improve GVC after TP. It was reported that gastrectomies (sub-TG: 10.7% and TG: 0.7%) had been performed with TP, and LGV dissection was one of the risks of GVC [3]. Additionally, the gastric drainage veins should undergo preservation or reconstruction to prevent GVC after TP, but the procedure has been reported to be difficult [2] [9] [10] [11] [12]. In our case, the gastric veins could not be preserved and we performed TG for the severe GVC and bleeding from the nasogastric tube with the strong pulsation in the LGA. Gastric veins preservation or reconstruction are recommended, but TP for cases with RCHA may require gastrectomy, including TG, due to severe GVC by increased blood flow of the LGA. As there are no guidelines for the management of GVC [3], classification of severity of GVC and indicators for gastrectomy may be needed.

Preserving the remaining stomach is better because the patient’s food intake decreases after TG. A study revealed that sub-TG was considered permissible for TP because the proximal stomach received arterial blood flow from the aortic esophageal arteries [3]. Moreover, intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography detected a blood flow from the esophagogastric junction through the intramural capillary network in the remnant stomach during DP after the previous DG [13]. One option in TP is to assess blood flow from the esophagus to the stomach using intraoperative ICG images after clamping the LGA and consider preserving the remaining stomach. In addition, surgical techniques that preserves the gastric arteries for the preservation of stomach as much as possible should be considered.

A long-term prognosis of TP with TG is unclear because of their rarity [3] [14]. However, in recent years, good quality of life has been maintained by dietary therapy after TG and insulin and pancreatic enzyme therapy after total pancreatectomy [15] [16] [17]. In this case, the patient continued chemotherapy until recurrence for over a year while maintaining serum albumin levels by combining these treatments. Nutritional status can be maintained for a long time, even after TP with TG, by combining diet therapy, insulin, and pancreatic enzyme therapy.

Conclusion

We experienced a case of intraoperative severe GVC requiring TG during TP with RCHA. TP with RCHA may increase the risk of severe GVC due to increased blood flow from CeA to LGA.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

TP:

Total pancreatectomy

GVC:

Gastric venous congestion

RCHA:

Replaced common hepatic artery

IPMN:

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia

CT:

Computed tomography

SpA:

Splenic artery

LGV:

Left gastric vein

SMA:

Superior mesenteric artery

CeA:

Celiac artery

DP:

Distal pancreatectomy

RGEV:

Right gastroepiploic vein

GDA:

Gastroduodenal artery

SSPTP:

Subtotal stomach preserving TP

RGV:

Right gastric vein

LGA:

Left gastric artery

TG:

Total gastrectomy

ICG:

Indocyanine green

References

  1. Casadei R, Ricci C, Ingaldi C, Alberici L, Minni F. Contemporary indications for upfront total pancreatectomy. Updat Surg. 2021;73(4):1205–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakao A, Yamada S, Fujii T, Tanaka H, Oshima K, Oshima Y, et al. Gastric venous congestion and bleeding in association with total pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(2):150–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stoop TF, von Gohren A, Engstrand J, Sparrelid E, Gilg S, Del Chiaro M, et al. Risk factors, management, and outcome of gastric venous congestion after total pancreatectomy: an underestimated complication requiring standardized identification, grading, and management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(12):7700–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Loos M, Mehrabi A, Ramouz A, Contin P, Strobel O, Müller-Stich BP, et al. Gastric venous congestion after total pancreatectomy is frequent and dangerous. Ann Surg. 2022;276(6):e896–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Covey AM, Brody LA, Maluccio MA, Getrajdman GI, Brown KT. Variant hepatic arterial anatomy revisited: digital subtraction angiography performed in 600 patients. Radiology. 2002;224(2):542–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beyer CA, Johnson MA, Galante JM, DuBose JJ, et al. Zones matter: hemodynamic effects of zone 1 vs zone 3 resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta placement in trauma patients. Injury. 2019;50(4):855–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mogl MT, Nüssler NC, Presser SJ, Podrabsky P, Denecke T, Grieser C, et al. Evolving experience with prevention and treatment of splenic artery syndrome after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transpl Int. 2010;23(8):831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vogl TJ, Pegios W, Balzer JO, Lobo M, Neuhaus P. Arterial steal syndrome in patients after liver transplantation: transarterial embolization of the splenic and gastroduodenal arteries. Rofo. 2001;173(10):908–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hackert T, Weitz J, Büchler MW. Reinsertion of the gastric coronary vein to avoid venous gastric congestion in pancreatic surgery. HPB. 2015;17(4):368–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hishida M, Nakao A, Hatsuno T, Yano H, Tanaka T, Takano N, et al. Total pancreatectomy with segmental duodenectomy preserving right gastroepiploic vein. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58(105):198–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandroussi C, McGilvray ID. Gastric venous reconstruction after radical pancreatic surgery: case report and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(6):1027–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kagota S, Shimizu T, Taniguchi K, Tomioka A, Inoue Y, Komeda K, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric venous congestion in association with extended resection of pancreas: a case report. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi H, Nara S, Ohigashi H, Sakamoto Y, Gotoh K, Esaki M, et al. Is preservation of the remnant stomach safe during distal pancreatectomy in patients who have undergone distal gastrectomy? World J Surg. 2013;37(2):430–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wen Y, Tu J, Xue X, Shi W, Qin L, Qian H, et al. A CARE-compliant case report: total pancreatectomy and total gastrectomy to treat pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Medicine. 2019;98(47): e18151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ida S, Hiki N, Cho H, Sakamaki K, Ito S, Fujitani K, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing standard diet with perioperative oral immunonutrition in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2017;104(4):377–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Billings BJ, Christein JD, Harmsen WS, Harrington JR, Chari ST, Que FG, et al. Quality-of-life after total pancreatectomy: is it really that bad on long-term follow-up? J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(8):1059–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jethwa P, Sodergren M, Lala A, Webber J, Buckels JA, Bramhall SR, et al. Diabetic control after total pancreatectomy. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38(6):415–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.com) for the English language review.

Funding

The authors declare no financial support in association with this case report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TY, HS, and HO participated in the surgery. TY, KA, and KS designed and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenichiro Araki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The patient’s privacy was protected, and this case report does not include any patient-identifying information.

Consent for publication

The patient signed written informed consent for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamanaka, T., Araki, K., Suzuki, H. et al. Intraoperative severe gastric venous congestion during total pancreatectomy with replaced common hepatic artery: a case report. surg case rep 10, 184 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-024-01983-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-024-01983-x

Keywords