Skip to main content

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast detected with real-time virtual sonography: a case report



Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) sometimes presents with unique clinical, pathologic, and radiographic features. In this case report, we describe a patient with ILC, whose initial presentation consisted with symptoms secondary to bone-marrow dissemination. In addition, the breast primary was revealed only by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by real-time virtual sonography (RVS).

Case presentation

A 51-year-old woman presented to our outpatient clinic with dyspnea on exertion. She had severe anemia (hemoglobin, 5.3 g/dL) and thrombocytopenia (platelet count, 31 × 103/mL). Bone-marrow biopsy was performed to evaluate hematopoietic function. The pathologic diagnosis was bone-marrow carcinomatosis due to metastatic breast cancer. Initial mammography followed by ultrasonography (US) failed to detect the primary tumor. On MRI, a non-mass-enhancement lesion was observed. While second-look US also did not detect the lesion, it was clearly visualized with RVS. We were finally able to biopsy the breast lesion. The pathologic diagnosis was ILC positive for both estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, with 1 + immunohistochemical staining for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. This case of ILC was characterized by bone-marrow metastasis. Due to decreased cell adhesion, the risk of bone-marrow metastasis is higher in ILC than in invasive ductal carcinoma, the most prevalent type of breast cancer. Biopsy of the primary lesion, which was initially only detected with MRI, was successfully performed with clear visualization during RVS, which is based on the fusion of MRI and US images.


In this case report and literature review, we describe the unique clinical characteristics of ILC and a strategy for identifying primary lesions that are initially only visualized with MRI.


Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common type of invasive breast cancer, after invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). ILC sometimes presents with unique clinical, pathologic, and radiographic features [1, 2]. In this case report, we describe a patient with ILC in whom the primary lesion was difficult to detect. Initial presentation consisted with symptoms secondary to bone-marrow dissemination. Real-time virtual sonography (RVS) was ultimately used to identify the primary breast lesion. RVS played an important role in making the precise pathologic diagnosis [3].

Case report

A 51-year-old woman presented with dyspnea on exertion that had started 2 weeks earlier. Physical examination revealed only conjunctival pallor. Breast palpation revealed no obvious masses. Laboratory examination demonstrated severe anemia, with a hemoglobin level of 5.3 g/dL. Since the patient also had a very low platelet count of 31 × 103/mL, bone-marrow biopsy was performed to evaluate hematopoietic function. Pathological examination revealed bone-marrow carcinomatosis with widespread metastatic signet-ring cell carcinoma cells and very few hematopoietic cells. Immunohistochemical staining yielded positive results for mammaglobin A (Cosmo Bio, Tokyo, Japan) and estrogen receptor (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), indicating that the metastases had originated in the breast (Fig. 1). Neither mammography nor ultrasonography (US) revealed the primary tumor. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET–CT) demonstrated bone-marrow metastases with diffuse 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) accumulation in both vertebral bodies and pelvis (Fig. 2). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of both breasts finally showed a non-mass-enhancement (NME) lesion on the right side that was suspected to be the primary tumor (Fig. 3). Neither second-look US nor US with elastography could reveal the lesion detected with MRI. MRI was one and only modality that could depict the primary breast cancer lesion. We, therefore, applied the RVS technique, which clearly revealed the primary cancer as a diffuse area of low echogenicity (Fig. 4). Core needle biopsy was finally performed. The pathologic diagnosis was ILC that was positive for both estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, with 1 + immunohistochemical staining for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and a Ki-67 index of 5%.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pathological findings in the bone-marrow biopsy specimen. A Hematoxylin–eosin staining. Signet-ring cell carcinoma cells were widespread. There were very few hematopoietic cells. B Positive immunohistochemical staining with an anti-mammaglobin A antibody, indicating that breast cancer was the primary tumor. C Positive immunohistochemical staining with an anti-estrogen receptor antibody. (Magnification × 20 for all.)

Fig. 2
figure 2

In the PET–CT scan image around the pelvis, diffuse FDG uptake is demonstrated

Fig. 3
figure 3

Contrast-enhanced prone MRI depicted a region with NME in the right breast (arrow)

Fig. 4
figure 4

A T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced additional supine MRI with multi planar reconstruction (MRI-MPR) showed an irregular enhancing mass (arrow). B View from the RVS monitor. Sonography showed a heterogeneous mass with low echogenicity and irregular shape. A pre-contrast MRI-MPR image is shown in (b). An early phase MRI-MPR image is shown in c. A late-phase MRI-MPR image is shown in d. Images (b–d) correspond to sonographic cutaway images in a

We prefer chemotherapy as a primary therapy, because the cancer had spread systemically. Chemotherapy was started, along with red blood cell and platelet transfusions. The chemotherapeutic regimen consisted of intravenous paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks. After 8 months of aggressive chemotherapy, the hemoglobin level and platelet count returned to normal. Levels of the tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 15–3, decreased from 1105 to 780 U/mL (normal range, < 35 U/mL). Anastrozole was initiated as adjuvant hormonal treatment. Approximately a year has passed since the initial cancer diagnosis with no progression identified.


ILC is the most common of the special types of breast cancer. ILC accounts for up to 15% of all breast cancer. It has a unique metastatic presentation, with a predilection for common sites such as the liver, lung, and bone as well as the gastrointestinal tract and gynecologic organs. ILC is also characterized by the lack of E-cadherin, a tumor suppressor that plays an important role in epithelial cell–cell adhesion and tumor morphogenesis. Loss of E-cadherin expression leads to decreased cellular adhesion, resulting in cell migration and metastatic spread [2, 4, 5]. These distinctive features of ILC presumably led to the bone-marrow metastasis described in the current report. Borst et al. reported that the metastatic pattern of ILC differs from that of IDC. The rate of bone-marrow metastasis was 21.2% among 359 patients with ILC and 14.4% among 2,246 patients with IDC, a statistically significant difference [6]. The prognosis of bone-marrow metastasis is so poor that chemotherapy should be considered. We began treatment of our patient with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab. Her disease status improved sufficiently. Of note, initial therapy for metastatic breast cancer with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab was previously shown to prolong progression-free survival [7].

In the present case, the primary ILC lesion in the breast was only revealed with MRI based on characteristic NME. As ILC invades the adjacent breast tissue along mammary ducts and usually does not form a palpable lump, conventional mammographic and ultrasound challenges result in false-negative diagnoses [8]. Brem et al. reported that the sensitivity of mammography, US and MRI in the detection of ILC among 28 biopsy-proven cases were 79%, 68% and 83%, respectively, indicating that the MRI presented the highest sensitivity [9]. In the fifth edition of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon, NME is classified as homogeneous, heterogeneous, clumped, and in a clustered ring [10]. NME lesions are considered to indicate malignancy; however, the prevalence of NME is much lower than that of mass enhancement [11, 12]. The BI-RADS lexicon has been shown to be inadequate for distinguishing between benign and malignant NME lesions [13,14,15]. In an analysis of 99 benign and 30 malignant NME lesions, Aydin reported that 17 (13.2%) lesions had a segmental distribution, like our patient’s lesion, of which 5 were benign and 12 were malignant [11]. Segmentally distributed lesions are most likely to be malignant.

In our case, second-look US failed to visualize the primary lesion in the breast that was detected by MRI. RVS was adopted as the next modality, which successfully demonstrated the lesion as a heterogeneous mass with low echogenicity and an irregular edge. It was previously reported that second-look US of breast cancer lesions detected with MRI identified 49% of mass lesions, 42% of focal lesions, and 15% of NME lesions [16]. RVS can be effective for clear visualization of NME lesions. The RVS system employed in this case simultaneously displayed both sonographic and MRI cutaway images of the same site in real time, which has excellent accuracy for identifying breast lesions with enhancement on MRI [3]. Nakano et al. also reported that RVS was highly useful for demonstrating NME lesions detected with MRI in 12 patients with breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery [17].

For pathological confirmation of the lesions visualized only by MRI, MRI-guided biopsy has become increasingly available. However, these techniques are not commonly available and require the costly use of the device and the medical staffs. On the other hand, RVS does not require large equipment and can be carried out easily at any time, suggesting that RVS is a patient-friendly technique that can visualize a large proportion of MRI findings. Furthermore, it should be validated that RVS could select the patients that really undergo MRI-guided biopsy. Nakano et al. reported that the detection rates of MRI-detected lesions with second-look sonography using RVS or not were 90% and 30%, respectively (P < 0.001) [18]. There would be thoughts that the MRI-guided biopsy is applied for the lesions that RVS failed to visualize. Unfortunately, no direct comparison between MRI-guided and RVS-guided biopsy has been demonstrated. The comparison of vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) among MRI, stereotactically and ultrasound-guided was reported by Imschweiler et al. [19]. In that report, the technical success rates of MRI-guided, stereotactically guided and ultrasound-guided VAB were 98.4%, 99.1% and 99.6%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the technical success rates between the MRI and ultrasound-guided VAB (P < 0.001). The complications were hemorrhage, infection, lesion miss and so forth. The total complication rate of ultrasound-guided VAB was significantly lower than that of MRI-guided VAB (P < 0.001).

RVS technique have some limitations. First, the MRI data introduced into RVS system are constructed with supine-position MRI examination, which is not established method for diagnosing breast cancer. Second, the US examinations are considered to be poor at reproducibility, because the breast will change its shape easily and the quality of the examination depend on the examiner’s skill. The result of multi-institutional study which was conducted for further investigation of the role of RVS and the examination of the interinstitutional reproducibility is awaited.


We encountered a patient with ILC and bone-marrow metastasis in which the initial chemotherapeutic intervention was effective. The primary breast cancer, which was identified as an NME lesion with MRI, could be clearly visualized with RVS and those radiological findings were considered to be relevant to morphological feature of ILC. Biopsy of the primary lesion was successfully performed by RVS-guidance. For the treatment of breast cancer, detailed imaging techniques and precise pathologic diagnosis are both essential.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions.



Invasive lobular carcinoma


Invasive ductal carcinoma


Real-time virtual sonography




Magnetic resonance imaging






Positron emission tomography–computed tomography


Multi planar reconstruction


Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System


  1. Thomas M, Kelly ED, Abraham J, Kruse M. Invasive lobular breast cancer: a review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and future directions of early stage disease. Semin Oncol. 2019;46:121–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCart Reed AE, Kalinowski L, Simpson PT, Lakhani SR. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: the increasing importance of this special subtype. Breast Cancer Res. 2021;23:6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakano S, Yoshida M, Fujii K, Yorozuya K, Mouri Y, et al. Fusion of MRI and sonography image for breast cancer evaluation using real-time virtual sonography with magnetic navigation: first experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39:552–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gumbiner BM. Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:622–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berx G, van Roy F. Involvement of members of the cadherin superfamily in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1: a003129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Borst MJ, Ingold JA. Metastatic patterns of invasive lobular versus invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Surgery. 1993;114:637–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J, Dickler M, Cobleigh M, et al. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2666–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parvaiz MA, Yang P, Razia E, Mascarenhas M, Deacon C, et al. Breast MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma: a useful investigation in surgical planning? Breast J. 2016;22:143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brem RF, Loffe M, Rapelyea JA, Yost KG, Weigert JM, et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, MRI, and breast-specific gamma imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:379–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C, Ojeda-Fournier H. A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition. Radiographics. 2016;36:623–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aydin H. The MRI characteristics of non-mass enhancement lesions of the breast: associations with malignancy. Br J Radiol. 2019;92:20180464.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang QX, Ji X, Feng LL, Zheng L, Zhou XQ, et al. Significant MRI indicators of malignancy for breast non-mass enhancement. J Xray Sci Technol. 2017;25:1033–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, et al. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:994–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilhelm A, McDonough MD, DePeri ER. Malignancy rates of non-masslike enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging using American College of radiology breast imaging reporting and data system descriptors. Breast J. 2012;18:523–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, Setoguchi T, Okafuji T, et al. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75:e126-132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hollowell L, Prince E, Arasu V, Wisner D, Hylton N, et al. Lesion morphology on breast MRI affects targeted ultrasound correlation rate. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:1279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kousaka J, Nakano S, Ando T, Tetsuka R, Fujii K, et al. Targeted sonography using an image fusion technique for evaluation of incidentally detected breast lesions on chest CT: a pilot study. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:301–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakano S, Kousaka J, Fujii K, Yorozuya K, Yoshida M, et al. Impact of real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses an image fusion technique, on sonographic evaluation of MRI-detected lesions of the breast in second-look sonography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:1179–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Imschweiler T, Haueisen H, Kampmann G, Rageth L, Seifert B, et al. MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison with stereotactically guided and ultrasound-guided techniques. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:128–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank all the medical staffs who took care of this patients.


This report did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conception and design: YI, SN. Provision of study material or patients: all authors. Collection and/or assembly of data: YI, SN. Data analysis and interpretation: all authors. Manuscript writing: all authors. Final approval of manuscript: all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimihito Fujii.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received approval from the institutional review board of Aichi University Hospital. The approval number is 2022-H040.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ito, Y., Fujii, K., Saito, M. et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast detected with real-time virtual sonography: a case report. surg case rep 9, 85 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • MRI
  • Non-mass-enhancement lesion
  • RVS
  • Invasive lobular carcinoma