Skip to main content

Combined basilar subsegmentectomy for intralobar sequestration via uniportal VATS: a case report

Abstract

Background

Combined basilar subsegmentectomy via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is an extremely complex surgery. Moreover, no the existing reports describe the procedure and technique. Here, we present the technique of combined basilar subsegmentectomy that was successfully performed via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to treat intralobar pulmonary sequestration in an adult patient.

Case presentation

A 57-year-old man underwent surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma. Preoperative computed tomography showed several cystic lesions in the right lower lobe. Subsequent enhanced computed tomography revealed an anomalous artery branching from the abdominal aorta and a normal pulmonary vein. The patient with diagnosed with Pryce type III intralobar pulmonary sequestration and underwent right S7 posterior + 10bc combined basilar segmentectomy via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 4 days after surgery. At the 8-month follow-up, computed tomography showed no abnormalities.

Conclusions

We successfully performed combined basilar subsegmentectomy via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. This surgical approach is useful for the treatment of intralobar pulmonary sequestration occurring at the basal segment of the lung.

Background

Intralobar pulmonary sequestration (ILPS) is characterized by a nonfunctional lung segment within the normal pulmonary parenchyma, which is supplied by an anomalous systemic artery [1]. The definitive treatment for ILPS is surgical excision; however, for benign disease, anatomical segmentectomy using a minimally invasive approach may be sufficient if the entire sequestered tissue is included in the segment [2]. Combined basilar subsegmentectomy via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) is an extremely complex surgery; moreover, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports describing the procedure. Herein, we present the technique of combined basilar subsegmentectomy successfully performed via U-VATS to treat ILPS in an adult patient.

Case presentation

A 57-year-old man underwent surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) revealed several cystic lesions in the right lower lung lobe (Fig. 1A) with consolidation and without direct communication with the bronchus. Enhanced and three-dimensional reconstruction CT (3D-CT) revealed an anomalous artery branching from the abdominal aorta and a normal pulmonary vein (Fig. 1B, C); thus, our diagnosis was Pryce type III ILPS. Laboratory findings were normal without any evidence of inflammation. The B7 bronchus branched anteriorly and posteriorly above the common basilar vein. The lesion was limited within the S7 posterior and S10bc, with normal remnant parenchyma. We planned a right S7 posterior + 10bc combined basilar subsegmentectomy via U-VATS based on the CT and 3DCT findings (Fig. 2A–D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Preoperative image of enhanced computed tomography and three-dimensional computed tomography. A Enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan showing intralobar sequestration. B Enhanced CT scan reveals an abnormal artery branching from the abdominal aorta (arrow). C Three-dimensional CT scan reveals an abnormal artery branching from the abdominal aorta (arrow)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schema of the anatomy of the basilar segment and intraoperative image. A Schematic of conventional and surgeon’s views of the vein and bronchus. B B7 posterior (black arrowhead), B7 anterior (arrow), and B9 + 10 (white arrowhead) are shown. C The B7 posterior (black arrowhead), B10bc (arrow), and B9 (white arrowhead) are shown. For complete resection of the lesion, it was necessary to divide the B10bc from the B7 posterior. D The V9 + 10 (arrow) is shown. Intersegmental vein preservation between S9 and S10 (white arrowhead) and division of the intrasegmental vein (black arrowhead) were planned

We made 4-cm utility incision along the midaxillary line in the sixth intercostal space. After adhesiolysis, an anomalous artery from the abdominal aorta in the lung ligament was ligated and divided. We dissected the lung parenchyma to expose V7. Subsequently, the plane between S7 anterior and S7 posterior was opened using a stapler along the V7 (intersegmental vein between S7 anterior and S7 posterior). The B7 posterior was identified beside the inferior basal pulmonary vein and was clipped and divided. Subsequently, the A7 posterior was identified and divided using a vessel-sealing system without proximal ligation. We meticulously dissected the pulmonary parenchyma along the inferior basal pulmonary vein, with the B10bc identified distally and divided using a stapler. After dividing these hilum structures, the pulmonary parenchyma was divided using the stapler. Thereafter, S7 posterior + 10bc combined basilar subsegmentectomy was performed (Fig. 3; Additional file 1: Video S1). The operation time was 202 min, and the total blood loss was 180 mL. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 4 days after surgery. Histopathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of ILPS. At the 8-month postoperative follow-up, CT revealed no abnormalities (Fig. 4). The case report was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University (#2020-S-60, December 15, 2020). Informed consent to publish this report was obtained from the patient.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Thoracoscopic combined basilar subsegmentectomy (S7 posteror + 10bc) for intralobar sequestration

Fig. 4
figure 4

Postoperative image of computed tomography

Discussion

The primary treatment for ILPS is surgical resection. The feasibility of segmentectomy via VATS for ILPS has been demonstrated previously [2, 3]. We consider segmentectomy to be an adequate treatment for benign disease if the lesion is included in the segment and can be removed completely. A potential advantage of segmentectomy over lobectomy is its improved capacity to preserve pulmonary function. Here, we performed an anatomically combined subsegmentectomy via U-VATS; therefore, the preserved lung maintained considerable volume, likely facilitating the preservation of a substantial degree of pulmonary function.

In this case, combined basilar subsegmentectomy via U-VATS was successfully used to treat ILPS in an adult patient. Nevertheless, U-VATS is considered technically difficult due to interference among instruments and the limited insertion angles caused by inserting all instruments including the thoracoscope through a single small wound. However, a previous study has reported U-VATS for treating ILPS and that uniportal VATS is comparable to multiportal VATS in terms of blood loss, surgical time, and postoperative outcomes [2]. Interestingly, a recent report revealed that U-VATS segmentectomies are better than multiportal VATS segmentectomies in postoperative outcomes [4, 5]. Factors including postoperative symptom relief and recovery time for U-VATS are encouraging.

In this case, preoperative 3D-CT was performed to determine the precise anatomy of complex vessels and bronchi. The precise interpretation of the structure of the target lung segment and its review from various angles before the surgery using enhanced CT and 3D-CT are essential. In parenchyma-sparing resection for ILPS, where resection of complex segmental structures or peripheral dissection of the pulmonary vein is required, preoperative 3D-CT is helpful for strategic surgery planning [6]. Although it is difficult to move the lung with U-VATS basilar subsegmentectomy, the technique may be used to dissect deep segment structures such as those described in this case. In limited resection involving the S7 posterior and S10bc, hilar structures are very deep from the interlobar fissure and require disrupted dissection of the lung parenchyma. However, the S7 posterior and S10bc bronchi are shallow for the non-fissure approach, making them easily accessible via a vein-first surgical strategy [7]. Furthermore, careful peripheral dissection of the vascular sheath of the pulmonary vein facilitates easy identification of the bronchi. The segmental plane was divided after pulmonary hilar structures were processed. Previous studies [7,8,9,10,11,12] have indicated that this approach might be useful not only for patients with a benign disease but also for those with metastatic lung tumors or small-sized non-solid lung cancer and those who underwent only passive limited resection for lung cancer. However, when lymph node dissection is performed, using the vein-first strategy might make it difficult to adequately approach the pulmonary hilum. Therefore, this method might be carefully indicated when lymph node dissection is required.

Conclusions

Although the indications for combined subsegmentectomy via U-VATS might be limited, factors including postoperative symptom relief and recovery time for U-VATS are encouraging, and it is important for patients that large lungs remain. This method should be considered as an important surgical approach for treating ILPS.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

3D-CT:

Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography

ILPS:

Intralobar pulmonary sequestration

U-VATS:

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

References

  1. Pryce DM. Lower accessory pulmonary artery with intralobar sequestration of lung; a report of seven cases. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1946;58:457–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1700580316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin TH, Huang WL, Chang CC, Yen YT, Lai WW, Tseng YL, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy and segmentectomy for pulmonary sequestration. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:3722–8. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.05.151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kestenholz PB, Schneiter D, Hillinger S, Lardinois D, Weder W. Thoracoscopic treatment of pulmonary sequestration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:815–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.02.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Numajiri K, Matsuura N, Igai H, Ohsawa F, Kamiyoshihara M. Uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy provides good perioperative results and early postoperative recovery. J Thorac Dis. 2022;14:2908–16. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen YY, Huang WL, Chang CC, Yen YT, Tseng YL. Uniportal versus multiportal thoracoscopic complex segmentectomy: propensity matching analysis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;27:237–43. https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.20-00231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oizumi H, Kanauchi N, Kato H, Endoh M, Suzuki J, Fukaya K, et al. Anatomic thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy under 3-dimensional multidetector computed tomography simulation: a report of 52 consecutive cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:678–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Takamori S, Oizumi H, Suzuki J, Watanabe H, Sato K, Saito S, et al. Thoracoscopic anatomical individual basilar segmentectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62: eza509. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezab509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tane S, Kitamura Y, Kimura K, Shimizu N, Matsumoto G, Uchino K, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy for inner-located small-sized early non-small-cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35: ivac218. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Handa Y, Tsutani Y, Mimae T, Miyata Y, Okada M. Complex segmentectomy in the treatment of stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57:114–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, Nakajima R, Suzuki K, Aokage K, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;399:1607–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02333-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamada A, Oizumi H, Kato H, Suzuki J, Nakahashi K, Takamori S, et al. Outcome of thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection under 3-dimensional computed tomography simulation. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:2312–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08506-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Takamori S, Oizumi H, Suzuki J, Suzuki K, Kabasawa T. Video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy for deep and peripheral small lung cancer. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;70:233–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The research reported in this publication was not supported by any external funding or grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ST: conceptualization; data curation; writing—original draft. HO: conceptualization; project administration; supervision; writing—review and editing. JS, SS: supervision; writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Takamori.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The case report was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University (#2020-S-60, 15 December 2020). Informed consent to publish this case report was obtained from the patient.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained for the publication of this report and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Video S1. Combined basilar subsegmentectomy (S7 posterior + S10bc) for intralobar sequestration via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takamori, S., Oizumi, H., Suzuki, J. et al. Combined basilar subsegmentectomy for intralobar sequestration via uniportal VATS: a case report. surg case rep 9, 14 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-023-01600-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-023-01600-3

Keywords