Skip to main content

A case of long-term survival treated with three metastasectomies and two subsequent adjuvant nivolumab therapies for recurrent malignant melanoma of the esophagus

Abstract

Background

The treatment strategy for metastatic lesions of primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus (PMME) is currently determined on a case-by-case basis, based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for cutaneous melanoma. The NCCN guidelines state that resection should be considered in patients with resectable metastatic recurrence. Herein, we report a case of long-term survival treated with three metastasectomies and two subsequent adjuvant nivolumab therapies for the metastatic recurrence of PMME.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old female patient with PMME underwent thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy, gastric tube reconstruction via the posterior mediastinal route, and cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed that the tumor was PMME with tumor invasion into the muscularis propria and no lymph node metastasis. At the age of 68 years, she developed intestinal invagination due to jejunal metastasis of malignant melanoma and underwent resection of the jejunum. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed two metastases of malignant melanoma in the jejunum and one metastasis to the mesenteric lymph node. At the age of 75 years, a recurrence of malignant melanoma was found in the cervical esophagus. She underwent thoracoscopic mobilization of the gastric tube and esophagus followed by cervical esophagectomy and reconstruction with a free jejunum flap. She received 24 courses of nivolumab therapy for 1 year as a postoperative adjuvant therapy. Subsequently, at the age of 78 years, an enlarged left cervical lymph node and a mass in the right lower lobe of the lung were found. She underwent left cervical lymph node dissection and thoracoscopic wedge resection of the right lung. Histopathological examination of the resected specimens revealed that both tumors were metastases of malignant melanoma. At age 79 years, she received eight courses of nivolumab therapy as a second postoperative adjuvant therapy, with no sign of recurrence in a 9-month follow-up period after the third metastasectomy.

Conclusion

In cases of metastatic recurrence of PMME, aggressive resection of oligometastasis with postoperative adjuvant nivolumab therapy may result in long-term survival.

Background

Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus (PMME) is a rare disease with poor prognosis [1,2,3]. Recently, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (such as anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies) for cutaneous melanoma has been reported in clinical trials [4], and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for cutaneous melanoma recommend their use in metastatic and unresectable cases [5]. The use of anti-PD-1 antibodies for PMME has also been reported [1, 6,7,8]. The treatment strategy for PMME is currently determined on a case-by-case basis, based on the NCCN guidelines for cutaneous melanoma [5], the United Kingdom (UK) national guidelines for head and neck mucosal melanoma [9], and other relevant guidelines. Herein, we report a case of long-term survival treated with three metastasectomies and two subsequent adjuvant nivolumab therapies for the metastatic recurrence of PMME.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old female patient with PMME underwent thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy, gastric tube reconstruction via the posterior mediastinal route, and cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. The postoperative course was uneventful. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen (Fig. 1) revealed that the tumor was PMME with tumor invasion into the muscularis propria, and no lymph node metastasis was found in 57 harvested lymph nodes. At the age of 68 years, she developed an acute small obstruction due to invagination (Fig. 2a) and underwent laparotomy. An intestinal invagination was found in the jejunum 70 cm from the ligament of Treitz, which was repositioned using Hutchinson’s maneuver, and a black tumor (Fig. 2b) was found at the leading point. Another black tumor was found 20 cm proximal, and a black lymph node (Fig. 2c) was found along the second jejunal artery. The jejunum and mesentery were resected, and the black lymph nodes were dissected. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed two metastatic malignant melanomas in the jejunum and one metastatic node in the five dissected mesenteric nodes. Although there was no sign of recurrence on semiannual computed tomography (CT) follow-up for 7 years, at the age of 75 years, CT showed a mass in the cervical esophagus (Fig. 3a). Endoscopy revealed an elevated lesion in the cervical esophagus (Fig. 3b), and biopsy revealed a recurrent malignant melanoma. After obtaining informed consent, we scheduled the surgery. She underwent thoracoscopic mobilization of the gastric tube and esophagus followed by cervical esophagectomy (Fig. 3c). Reconstruction was performed by cervical esophageal jejunal anastomosis and jejunal gastric anastomosis using a free jejunum flap in the third jejunal arteriovenous region. The jejunal artery and jejunal vein were anastomosed to the transverse cervical artery and internal jugular vein, respectively. The postoperative course was uneventful. No BRAF mutations (V600E and V600K) were detected in the tumor. The programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in the tumor were < 1% and microsatellite stable, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Resected specimen after thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. b Magnified view of the same specimen described in a. An elevated black mass is found in the esophagus

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Computed tomography showing the presence of an intestinal invagination. b Intraoperative findings. After repositioning the invagination, a black tumor is found in the jejunum. c Intraoperative findings. A black lymph node is found in the region of the second jejunal artery

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Computed tomography showing a mass in the cervical esophagus. The yellow arrowhead indicates a mass found in the cervical esophagus. b Endoscopy showing the elevated lesion in the cervical esophagus. The yellow arrowhead indicates the site of esophagogastric anastomosis. c Resected specimen after cervical esophagectomy. A black mass is found in the cervical esophagus. The yellow arrowhead indicates the esophagogastric anastomosis

The patient received 24 courses of nivolumab therapy for one year as a postoperative adjuvant therapy. Subsequently, at the age of 78 years (18 months after the completion of adjuvant nivolumab therapy), CT showed an enlarged left cervical lymph node and a mass in the right lower lobe of the lung. She underwent left cervical lymph node dissection and thoracoscopic wedge resection of the right lower lobe of the lung. Histopathological examination revealed that both tumors were metastases from malignant melanoma. At the age of 79 years (14 years since the initial diagnosis), she received eight courses of nivolumab therapy as a second postoperative adjuvant therapy with no sign of recurrence in a 9-month follow-up period after the third metastasectomy.

Discussion

We report a case of PMME with metastatic recurrence treated with three metastasectomies and subsequent nivolumab therapy. Although there have been few reports on PMME owing to its rarity, summary reports of more than 50 cases have shown a poor prognosis with a median survival time of 13.5–16 months [2, 3]. Dai et al. reported a median disease-free survival of 5.9 months for 70 resected cases [3], and Wang et al. reported a median relapse-free survival (RFS) of 4.5 months for 58 resected cases [1], indicating that the prognosis for resected cases was also poor. Although many papers, including our previous report [10], have reported on resection as the initial treatment of PMME, there are few reports describing treatment after recurrence [6,7,8, 11,12,13,14]. According to previous reports, recurrence sites vary widely, and treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy are used. In recent reports, nivolumab and ipilimumab have been administered as immunotherapy [6,7,8]. Thus, the treatment for recurrence after primary resection of PMME has not yet been determined. The NCCN guidelines for cutaneous melanoma state that resection should be considered in cases of resectable metastatic recurrent disease [5]. In cases of unresectable metastatic recurrence, systemic therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF inhibitors in the presence of BRAF mutations is recommended [5]. In contrast, the UK national guidelines for head and neck mucosal melanoma recommend systemic therapy for locally recurrent lesions, and the decision to resect should be made on a case-by-case basis [9]. However, gastrointestinal (GI) melanoma has a poorer prognosis than cutaneous melanoma [15], and the prognosis of PMME is even poorer [16]. Zheng et al. analyzed the prognostic factors in 1080 cases of GI melanoma. In a multivariate analysis, they reported that resection of the primary site is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival and cancer-specific survival, and that decreased survival was associated with esophageal origin and no resection of the primary site [16]. Unfortunately, the efficacy of nivolumab in advanced mucosal melanoma is not comparable to that in cutaneous melanoma [17, 18]. Taken together, despite the advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors, surgical resection plays an essential role in the treatment of PMME. Therefore, aggressive surgery should be considered for single or oligometastasis of PMME where surgical expertise is available.

The postoperative follow-up of PMME patients has not been determined. Dai et al. reported that more than 90% of recurrences occur within 2 years after surgery for PMME. The recurrence sites were lymph nodes, liver, lung, bone, and anastomosis in order of frequency [3]. They followed up with CT every 3 months until the second postoperative year and every 6 months from the third to the fifth postoperative year. In this case, we followed up with CT every 3 months until the second postoperative year, and every 6 months after the third postoperative year. The endoscopy was performed once a year. After the fifth postoperative year, we have continued to follow-up with CT every 6 months.

The NCCN guidelines for cutaneous melanoma recommend resection combined with adjuvant therapy, including nivolumab, for both resectable primary and recurrent lesions. Wang et al. reported significantly prolonged RFS in PMME patients treated with surgery combined with adjuvant therapy, such as temozolomide/dacarbazine-based chemotherapy or high-dose interferon therapy, versus surgery alone [1]. They also reported the use of anti-PD-1 antibodies in 12 patients with PMME and a significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in the anti-PD-1 antibody group compared to the chemotherapy group using temozolomide/dacarbazine or paclitaxel together with carboplatin [1]. In addition to malignant melanoma, the efficacy of nivolumab has been reported in unresectable advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer [19, 20], head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [21], esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [22, 23], gastric cancer [24], microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer [25], malignant pleural mesothelioma [26], and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma [27]. Its efficacy has also been reported in postoperative adjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer [28] and urothelial carcinoma [29]. Even in cases of PMME, it is certainly better to use adjuvant nivolumab therapy after the resection of resectable primary lesions or metastases/recurrences regardless of the PD-L1 expression and the status of MSI [30, 31].

Nomura et al. reported that the efficacy of the second nivolumab therapy in patients with melanoma was associated with the duration of PFS after the first nivolumab therapy [32]. Our patient, who did not experience recurrence for 18 months after completion of the first adjuvant nivolumab therapy, is considered a good candidate for second adjuvant nivolumab therapy, although evidence for this is still lacking.

Conclusions

Although the prognosis of patients with metastatic recurrence of PMME is poor, aggressive surgical intervention followed by adjuvant therapy with nivolumab may lead to long-term survival in the case of single or resectable oligometastatic lesions.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

PMME:

Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus

PD-1:

Programmed death 1

NCCN:

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

UK:

United Kingdom

CT:

Computed tomography

GI:

Gastrointestinal

RFS:

Relapse-free survival

PFS:

Progression-free survival

MSI:

Microsatellite instability

PD-L1:

Programmed death-ligand 1

References

  1. Wang X, Kong Y, Chi Z, Sheng X, Cui C, Mao L, et al. Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus: a retrospective analysis of clinical features, management, and survival of 76 patients. Thorac Cancer. 2019;10:950–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Makuuchi H, Takubo K, Yanagisawa A, Yamamoto S. Esophageal malignant melanoma: analysis of 134 cases collected by the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus. 2015;12:158–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dai L, Wang ZM, Xue ZQ, He M, Yuan Y, Shang XQ, et al. Results of surgical treatment for primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus: a multicenter retrospective study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161:294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1345–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Coit DG, Thompson JA, Albertini MR, Barker C, Carson WE, Contreras C, et al. Cutaneous Melanoma, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17:367–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sasaki K, Uchikado Y, Omoto I, Amatatsu M, Megumi K, Okumura H, et al. Multidisciplinary therapy for metastatic primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus: a case report. Mol Clin Oncol. 2018;8:528–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Endo F, Akiyama Y, Onishi M, Fujisawa R, Sasaki N, Nikai H, et al. Primary esophageal malignant melanoma successfully treated with anti-PD-1 antibody for retroperitoneal recurrence after esophagectomy: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;75:152–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ito S, Tachimori Y, Terado Y, Sakon R, Narita K, Goto M. Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus successfully treated with nivolumab: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2021;15:237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nenclares P, Ap Dafydd D, Bagwan I, Begg D, Kerawala C, King E, Lingley K, Paleri V, Paterson G, Payne M, Silva P, Steven N, Turnbull N, Yip K, et al. Head and neck mucosal melanoma: the United Kingdom national guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2020;138:11–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Itami A, Makino T, Shimada Y, Imamura M. A case of primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus with long-term survival. Esophagus. 2004;1:135–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki Y, Aoyama N, Minamide J, Takata K, Ogata T. Amelanotic malignant melanoma of the esophagus: report of a patient with recurrence successfully treated with chemoendocrine therapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2005;10:204–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ueda Y, Shimizu K, Itoh T, Fuji N, Naito K, Shiozaki A, et al. Induction of peptide-specific immune response in patients with primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus after immunotherapy using dendritic cells pulsed with MAGE peptides. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007;37(2):140–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta V, Kochhar R, Sinha SK, Das A. Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus: long-term survival after radical resection. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:1180–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang L, Ma W, Li Y. Huge primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus: a case report and literature review. Thorac Cancer. 2013;4:479–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahl AR, Gao X, Chioreso C, Goffredo P, Hassan I, Charlton ME, et al. Presentation, management, and prognosis of primary gastrointestinal melanoma: a population-based study. J Surg Res. 2021;260:46–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng Y, Cong C, Su C, Sun Y, Xing L. Epidemiology and survival outcomes of primary gastrointestinal melanoma: a SEER-based population study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020;25:1951–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nomura M, Oze I, Masuishi T, Yokota T, Satake H, Iwasawa S, et al. Multicenter prospective phase II trial of nivolumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020;25:972–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Angelo SP, Larkin J, Sosman JA, Lebbé C, Brady B, Neyns B, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with mucosal melanoma: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:226–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crinò L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:123–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1627–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1856–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kato K, Cho BC, Takahashi M, Okada M, Lin CY, Chin K, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1506–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Doki Y, Ajani JA, Kato K, Xu J, Wyrwicz L, Motoyama S, CheckMate 648 Trial Investigators, et al. Nivolumab combination therapy in advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:449–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kang YK, Boku N, Satoh T, Ryu MH, Chao Y, Kato K, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2461–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Overman MJ, Lonardi S, Wong KYM, Lenz HJ, Gelsomino F, Aglietta M, et al. Durable clinical benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in DNA mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:773–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baas P, Scherpereel A, Nowak AK, Fujimoto N, Peters S, Tsao AS, et al. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (CheckMate 743): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397:375–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Younes A, Santoro A, Shipp M, Zinzani PL, Timmerman JM, Ansell S, et al. Nivolumab for classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma after failure of both autologous stem-cell transplantation and brentuximab vedotin: a multicentre, multicohort, single-arm phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1283–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, Zander T, Van Cutsem E, Piessen G, CheckMate 577 Investigators, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1191–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, Schenker M, Valderrama BP, Tomita Y, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2102–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, Gogas HJ, Arance AM, Cowey CL, CheckMate 238 Collaborators, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1824–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ascierto PA, Del Vecchio M, Mandalá M, Gogas H, Arance AM, Dalle S, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB-C and stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 238): 4-year results from a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1465–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nomura M, Otsuka A, Kondo T, Nagai H, Nonomura Y, Kaku Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of retreatment with nivolumab in metastatic melanoma patients previously treated with nivolumab. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;80:999–1004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the individuals who contributed to this work and for helpful discussions.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KH drafted the manuscript. ST, MN, SF, YY, TN, SH, HM, NH, AI, ET, and KO contributed to interpretation of the data and the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeru Tsunoda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanada, K., Tsunoda, S., Nomura, M. et al. A case of long-term survival treated with three metastasectomies and two subsequent adjuvant nivolumab therapies for recurrent malignant melanoma of the esophagus. surg case rep 8, 206 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01561-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01561-z

Keywords