Skip to main content

Primary spindle cell tumor originating from the liver that was difficult to diagnose

Abstract

Background

It has been reported that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with spindle cell tumor accounts for 1.8% of all HCCs, but spindle cell tumors that do not show an obvious conventional HCC are extremely rare. In this report, we describe a case of resection of a primary spindle cell tumor of the liver that was difficult to diagnose.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old man presented with fever and right chest pain. He was suspected of a giant primary diaphragmatic tumor of extrahepatic origin by imaging studies. The preoperative differential diagnosis included benign masses such as myxoid sarcoma and schwannoma, and we planned a diaphragmatic resection. Intraoperatively, however, dissection of the tumor from the liver was not possible, requiring an extended right posterior segmentectomy with combined resection of the diaphragm. The patient had a good postoperative course and 1 year has passed since the surgery with no recurrence. The pathology showed that the mass was located just below the hepatic capsule/parenchymal region and was adherent to the diaphragm, but there was no continuity. The morphology suggested a low-grade mesenchymal tumor such as a solitary fibrous tumor and perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, but immunostaining was negative, making the diagnosis difficult. Although some areas of high proliferative activity were observed, finally, the diagnosis of primary spindle cell tumor of the liver with smooth muscle differentiation was made based on the positive results of muscle markers such as αSMA, desmin, and h-caldesmon.

Conclusions

Spindle cell tumor arising from the liver is so rare that preoperative and pathological diagnosis is often difficult to reach. Although further studies are needed to elucidate and better understand this uncommon clinical entity, we consider that complete resection is necessary for the above case, which may contribute to long-term survival.

Background

Spindle cell carcinoma, a subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), usually consists of epithelial components of HCC intermingled with pseudosarcomatous areas [1], and this partial spindle cell transformation is also seen in many other epithelial tumors, such as those of the upper digestive tract [2], skin [3], breast [4], female genital tract [5], urinary tract [2], and lung [6, 7]. However, those consisting only of spindle cells are most likely not derived from hepatocytes, and cases without sarcomatous change are extremely rare [8]. We herein report a patient with a primary spindle cell tumor of the liver that was difficult to diagnose, who successfully underwent extended hepatectomy.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old man presented with fever and right chest pain. The blood biochemical tests showed the following: lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), 251 IU/L; alkaline phosphatase (ALP), 469 IU/L; gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GTP), 125 IU/L; creatinine (Cre) 1.43 mg/dL; C-reactive protein (CRP) 3.04 mg/dL; squamous cell carcinoma-related antigen (SCC), 1.8 ng/mL; nerve specific enolase (NSE), 21.6 ng/mL; soluble interleukin-2 receptor (SIL-2R), 614 U/mL. Computed tomography (CT) showed a huge 10-cm mass under the right diaphragm (Fig. 1a, b). This well-circumscribed and smooth-marginated tumor showed minor enhancement in the lower density areas close to the fat and showed a gradual, heterogeneous mild enhancement of tumor and liver margins. The main feeder for the tumor is the right inferior phrenic artery, and this tumor was supposed to be a sarcomatoid malignancy originating from the diaphragm rather than a benign disease such as schwannoma on CT. No findings were suggesting obvious pulmonary invasion. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated heterogeneous high signal intensity on T2-weighted images (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) (Fig. 1c). Contrast-enhanced MRI showed gradual heterogeneous enhancement similar to CT findings. Findings of extrahepatic development were also obtained, but the possibility of adhesion to the liver was suspected. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) revealed abnormal uptake in the tumor with a maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 4.6 (Fig. 1d). The uptake was not so high, and a myxoid type sarcoma, such as myxoid liposarcoma, or benign tumor was considered. Although a definitive diagnosis could not be achieved, we scheduled a diaphragmatic resection for suspicion of benign tumors of the diaphragm, such as mucous-type sarcoma or schwannoma. However, we performed extended right posterior segmentectomy with combined resection of the diaphragm, because separation of the tumor from the liver was not possible and the tumor was close to the posterior Glisson’s pedicles and segment 8 dorsal Glisson’s pedicles (Fig. 2a–e). The total operation time was 8 h 10 m, and the total blood loss was 1459 mL. Although the major diameter of the diaphragmatic defect was 12 cm, simple closure was possible (Fig. 2f). The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful, and he was discharged 14 days after surgery. Pathological findings showed that the mass was located just below the hepatic capsule/intraparenchymal space and was adherent to the diaphragm, but there was no continuity with the diaphragm (Fig. 3). Mitosis was unremarkable, about 0–1 cells/10 HPF. The morphology suggested low-grade mesenchymal tumors such as solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) and perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) (Fig. 4a–d), but immunostaining was negative for these tumors, making the diagnosis difficult (Fig. 5a–f). We diagnosed the tumor as a spindle cell tumor with smooth muscle differentiation because of the positive results of myosin markers such as αSMA, desmin, and h-caldesmon, although some areas with high proliferative activity were observed. 1 year has passed since the surgery with no recurrence.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). a, b CT shows a well-circumscribed and smooth-marginated, huge 10-cm mass under the right diaphragm. The main feeder for the tumor is the right inferior phrenic artery. c MRI demonstrates heterogeneous high signal intensity on T2WI. d PET revealed abnormal uptake in the tumor with a SUVmax of 4.6

Fig. 2
figure 2

Surgical procedure. a Separation of the tumor from the liver was not possible. b, c Combined resection of the diaphragm was performed. d By clamping A5, we found the boundary between S5 and S6. e We performed extended right posterior segmentectomy (S6, 7, 8dors resection). f simple closure of the diaphragm was possible

Fig.3
figure 3

Macroscopic of the resected specimen. A well-circumscribed nodular tumor of 11 × 10 × 8.5 cm in size was located just below the hepatic capsule/intraparenchymal space and was adherent to the diaphragm, but there was no continuity with the diaphragm

Fig. 4
figure 4

Microscopic findings of the tumor. Hematoxylin and eosin staining. a Section shows a proliferation of anaplastic cells with clear cytoplasm and round heteroplasm. Map-like necrotic foci are seen in some areas. b Some areas contain fat droplets and exhibit lipomatous features. Mitotic figures are rarely seen. c Bundled proliferation of spindle-shaped cells is seen in some tumors. d Myxoid or microcystic changes of the stroma and hemangiopericytomatous vessels are also seen

Fig. 5
figure 5

Immunohistochemistry. a, c, d The tumor cells are negative for CD34, HMB45, Melan A. b, e The tumor cells are positive for α-SMA, glypican-3. f Ki-67 index is 10% (hot spot)

Discussion

Spindle cell tumors, first described by Weiss and Enzinger in 1896, are a small subset of mesenchymal cell tumors that arise primarily from mesodermal tissue [9]. It includes both benign and malignant tumors, with the former subclass including schwannomas, neurofibromas, leiomyomas, and fibromas. However, most cases belong to the intermediate group and are difficult to classify, and malignant transformation of benign tumors is often encountered [10]. Spindle cell tumors are derived from various types of tumors such as fibrosarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and intra-abdominal desmoid tumors [11], and in malignant cases, carcinoma, an epithelial malignancy, and sarcoma, a stromal malignancy, are found within the same tumor [12, 13]. No common view of the histological features has been established in the stromal area, which is mainly composed of spindle-shaped cells that constitute the sarcoma-like component [14]. The WHO officially classified spindle cell tumors as soft tissue neoplasms in 1994, and neoplasms with spindle cells are rarely seen in malignant tumors of various organs, with reported frequencies of 2.2% [15], 3.1% [16], 0.3% [17], and 0.4% [18] in cancers of the esophagus, thyroid, lung, and mammary gland, respectively.

In the liver, the proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma with spindle cells is estimated to be 1.8% of all resected hepatocellular carcinomas [19] and is usually observed as partial spindle cellularity with the epithelial component of the hepatocellular carcinoma intermingled with pseudosarcomatous areas [1]. This is a so-called sarcomatoid carcinoma, which often shows a transition pattern between the carcinoma and sarcoma components, resulting in a sarcomatoid transformation of some of the carcinoma components [20], or a pattern in which stem cells can differentiate into both epithelial and non-epithelial cells become carcinoma [21]. On the other hand, reports of tumors with spindle cell tumor images that do not clearly show the usual type of hepatocellular carcinoma are extremely rare, and as far as we could find, only two cases [8] were reported, including our case. The giant liver tumor reported by Kato et al. was composed of spindle-shaped cells with no epithelial tumor appearance and showed sarcoma-like changes, but no obvious epithelial elements were detected except for the positive keratin, so the tumor was classified as a primary malignant spindle cell tumor of the liver considering its unknown origin.

Histologically, our case was suspected to have a low-grade mesenchymal tumor such as SFT, PEComa, or liposarcoma, but there was no noticeable change in the sarcomatoid component, and immunostaining was negative for melanocyte markers, CD34, STAT6, and CDK4, then there was little evidence to support these findings. It was difficult to diagnose the tumor, but we concluded that it was a primary spindle cell tumor of the liver showing smooth muscle differentiation because of the positivity of three muscle system markers (Table 1). Currently, there is no subclassification of spindle cell tumor in the WHO classification of liver tumors, but the number of tumor types is increasing with time, and the accumulation of such cases in the future may suggest the establishment of a subclassification similar to that of breast and lung tumors.

Table 1 Immunohistochemical findings

Although the imaging characteristics of spindle cell tumors have not been established [22] and differential diagnosis is generally difficult [23], a needle biopsy may be considered as an aid in improving preoperative diagnosis. However, it should be noted that the accuracy rate of the preoperative diagnosis is not high [24, 25] and may be a cause of dissemination [26], so it may not be recommended aggressively.

The feeding artery of the tumor, in our case, was the right inferior phrenic artery, and it was diagnosed preoperatively as a primary diaphragmatic tumor with a predominantly expansive growth. However, intraoperative findings could not determine whether the liver or the diaphragm was the primary tumor, so a hepatic resection with combined resection of the diaphragm was performed to remove the tumor, and an R0 resection was obtained. Finally, the pathological diagnosis was that of a tumor originating from the liver, and the difficulty of preoperative diagnosis was apparent. Therefore, although there was no continuity between the tumor and the diaphragm histologically, diaphragmatic invasion of the liver tumor was considered clinically. Extrahepatic development of liver tumors is rare, but has been reported mainly in Japan, and the mechanisms of HCC with such characteristics include (1) carcinomatosis of the accessory hepatic lobe; (2) carcinomatosis of ectopic liver tissue; (3) development from the Riedel lobe; (4) development from the cirrhotic protrusion, and (5) extrahepatic progress of marginal liver cancer [27,28,29]. Although this case was not HCC, it was considered to be consistent with (5) by process of elimination. Furthermore, Miyagawa et al. [30] noted that the presence of extrahepatic feeding vessels and large tumor diameter are significant factors contributing to multiorgan invasion in extrahepatic growth-type HCC, and concluded that the possibility of multiorgan invasion should be considered when extrahepatic feeding vessels are found in a large extrahepatic HCC. Among such tumors, two cases [31] have been reported in which it was difficult to distinguish them from diaphragmatic tumors, and only one case [32], in which the right inferior phrenic artery was the main feeder, as in the present case, was extremely rare. Although the histological findings in our case were not positively suggestive of malignancy, the ki-67 positivity rate was higher at the margins of the extrahepatic tumor than at other sites, indicating high proliferative activity. The tumor cells that originated in the hepatic capsule or its vicinity developed extrahepatic growth with somewhat higher proliferative activity, and the right inferior phrenic artery was predominantly observed as the main feeder, which histologically supported the above-mentioned characteristics of extrahepatic liver tumors with multiple organ involvement.

Maeda et al. [19] and Jernigan et al. [33] stated that HCC subtypes with spindle cell components have very aggressive biology and often cause portal vein invasion or extrahepatic metastasis, and therefore have a poor prognosis [34]. However, Kaibori et al. [35] reported that the prognosis of the resected group was significantly better than that of the unresected group in cases of primary sarcomatoid carcinoma of the liver (P = 0.001). In addition, there are some reports that long-term survival can be expected by complete resection even in cases of primary liver liposarcoma [36], which tends to show extracapsular invasion [37]. In the current situation where no other treatment methods have been established, tumor resection should be performed aggressively for the primary spindle cell tumor of the liver. Since this case is not as malignant as sarcoma or liposarcoma and is considered to be different from them, there is not sufficient evidence at this time to conclude that partial resection rather than anatomical resection is acceptable even for peripheral lesions. As to which of the two techniques is more appropriate, it may be controversial, as in HCC, but in accordance with the extrahepatic development of HCC discussed above, anatomical resection may be the choice to be made whenever possible in the past literature [38, 39]. Although the patient has been recurrence-free for one year after complete resection, strict follow-up is necessary for the future, and it is important to continue accumulating and examining this kind of case to establish other treatments such as adjuvant therapy.

Conclusions

We reported a case of a spindle cell tumor originating from the liver. Spindle cell tumor arising from the liver is so rare that preoperative and pathological diagnosis is often difficult to reach. Complete resection should be considered in cases where the above disease is the differential diagnosis and may contribute to long-term survival.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

CT:

Computed tomography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

T2WI:

T2-weighted images

DWI:

Diffusion-weighted images

FDG-PET:

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography

SFT:

Solitary fibrous tumor

PEComa:

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor

References

  1. The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer, The 6th Edition, Revised Version, Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.

  2. Balercia G, Bhan AK, Dickersin GR. Sarcomatoid carcinoma: an ultrastructural study with light microscopic and immunohistochemical correlation of ten cases from various anatomic sites. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1995;19:249–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans HL, Smith JL. Spindle cell squamous carcinomas and sarcoma-like tumors of the skin: a comparative study of 38 cases. Cancer. 1980;45:2687–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gersell DJ, Katzenstein AL. Spindle cell carcinoma of the breast. A clinicopathologic and ultrastructural study. Hum Pathol. 1981;12:550–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Steeper TA, Piscioli F, Rosai J. Squamous cell carcinoma with sarcoma-like stroma of the female genital tract. Clinicopathologic study of four cases. Cancer. 1983;52:890–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Humphrey PA, Scroggs MW, Roggli VL, Shelburne JD. Pulmonary carcinomas with a sarcomatoid element: an immunocytochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Hum Pathol. 1988;19:155–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ro JY, Chen JL, Lee JS, Sahin AA, Ordonez NG, Ayala AG. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies of 14 cases. Cancer. 1992;69:376–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kato Y, Yoshimi F, Marumori T, Onaya H, Takasaki I, Shinoyama Y, et al. Malignant spindle cell tumor which was supposed to be originated from the liver, a case report. Liver Cancer. 2003;9(1):30–3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis GL, Langloss JM, Heffner DK, Hyams VJ. Spindle-cell carcinoma of the aerodigestive tract. An immunohistochemical analysis of 21 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;11:335–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Palazzo WL, Schulz MD. Spindle-cell tumors of the gastro-intestinal tract. Radiology. 1948;51(6):779–89.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hua H, He Z, Lei L, Xie H, Deng Z, Cheng Z, et al. Retroperitoneal spindle cell tumor: a case report. Front Surg. 2021;8: 764901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshida T, Osafune H, Yamamoto M, Tanino T, Oda M, Hiruta N. A case of carcinosarcoma in the Larynx. J Jpn Bronchoesophagol Soc. 1990;41(6):443–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaneko H. So-called carcinosarcoma of the larynx. Case report. J Otolaryngol Japan. 1963;66:1410–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Okado Y, Sueta T, Sugiyama Y, Miyagi M, Nakagawa T, Takeshita M. A case report of spindle cell carcinoma with rapid progress. J Jpn Soc Head Neck Surg. 2014;24(1):63–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gal AA, Martin SE, Kernen JA, et al. Esophageal carcinoma with prominent spindle cells. Cancer. 1987;60:2244–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carcangiu ML, Steeper T, Zampi G, et al. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a study of 70 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;83:135–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Travis WD, Travis LB, Devesa SS. Lung cancer. Cancer. 1995;75:191–202.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kohashi T, Kuroda Y, Amano H, Masaoka T, Urushihara T, Kuranishi F. A case of bilateral synchronous breast cancer involving spindle cell carcinoma unilaterally. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1998;59(7):1784–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maeda T, Adachi E, Kajiyama K, et al. Spindle cell hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 15 cases. Cancer. 1996;77:51–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugihara S, Kakizoe S, Ito Y, Nakashima O, Maruiwa M, Kojiro M. Clinicopathologic study of hepatocellular carcinoma with sarcomatous appearance. Liver. 1988;29:71–6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson L, Chang B, Barsky S. Monoclonal origins of malignant mixed tumor (carcinosarcoma). Evidence for a divergent histogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20:277–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ishijima M, Tanaka M, Lee K, Kokubun Y, Asaoka A, Ito K, et al. A case of hepatocellular carcinoma presumably transforming to malignant spindle cell tumor. J Jpn Soc Gastroenteroloy. 1995;92(11):1886–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsui T, Tsuji K, Ichiya T, Komaba F, Kang JH, Kodama Y, et al. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the liver: a case report and review of the literature. J Jpn Soc Gastroenterology. 2010;107:1175–83.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Takao S, Takada N, Watanabe J, Kuniyoshi M, Satoh T, Kuwano H, et al. A case of sarcomatoid carcinoma of the liver. Kanzo. 2008;49:376–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hua H, He Z, Lei L, Xie H, Deng Z, Cheng Z, et al. Retroperitoneal spindle cell tumor: a case report. Front Surg. 2021;8:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tomomatsu M, Ikuta S, Iida H, Aihara T, Yanagi H, Kakuno A, et al. A case of rapidly progressed sarcomatoid carcinoma of the liver. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2014;75(3):775–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Miyoshi M, Iwasa N, Fujii H, Katake K. A case of pedunculated hepatoma with spontaneous rupture. Kanzo. 1977;18:765–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldberg SJ, Wallerstein H. Primary massive liver cell carcinoma. Rec Gastroenterol. 1934;1:305–13.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Arakawa M, Kage M, Isomura T, Motoyama F, Nakashima T, Kubo Y, et al. Pathomorphological studies on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-Seven cases of HCC with extrahepatic tumor growth, so-called “Pedunculated hepatoma.” Kanzo. 1982;23:942–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miyagawa M, Miyanaga Y, Yasuda Y, Atsuji K, Tanaka H, Amaike H, et al. The significance of extrahepatic feeding arteries in patients with extrahepatically growing hepatocellular carcinoma infiltrating into other organs. Kanzo. 2013;54:257–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hirai I, Kimura W, Oizumi H, Fujimoto H, Watanabe T, Tezuka K, et al. A case of spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma mimicking a diaphragm tumor: reconstruction of the diaphragm using a latissimus dorsi muscle flap. Yamagata Med J. 2014;32(1):29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hayashi H, Nakazaki T, Hukuda D, Jibiki M, Taniguchi H, Nakao S, et al. A case of the cholangiocellular carcinoma that was difficult to distinguish from tumor of diaphragm. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2005;38:1744–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jernigan PL, Wima K, Hanseman DJ, Hoehn RS, Ahmad SA, Shah SA, et al. Natural history and treatment trends in hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes: insights from a national cancer registry. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:872–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kubota K, Kakuta Y, Kawamura S, Abe Y, Inamori M, Kawamura H, et al. Undifferentiated spindle-cell carcinoma of the gallbladder: an immunohistochemical study. J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:468–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaibori M, Kawaguchi Y, Yokoigawa N, et al. Intrahepatic sarcomatoid cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:1097–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kontani T, Shimada K, Iwakura S, Donishi H, Tamura K, Aoki Y. A case of primary liposarcoma of the liver. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2007;68(7):1765–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Inada S, Nunobe S, Tanioka Y, Hamagashira K, Kobayashi M, Nomi S. A case of liposarcoma of the greater omentum. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2000;61:1914–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Ohtsubo T, et al. Effectiveness of systematized hepatectomy with Glisson’s pedicle transection at the hepatic hilus for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma. Retrospective analysis. Surgery. 2001;130:443–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Miyagawa Y, et al. Prognostic significance of anatomical resection and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1999;86:1032–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors conceived the study concept and participated in the interpretation of the results and writing of the report. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohiko Ikehara.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from this patient and his family for the publication of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ikehara, T., Shimizu, T., Hirano, S. et al. Primary spindle cell tumor originating from the liver that was difficult to diagnose. surg case rep 8, 171 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01530-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01530-6

Keywords

  • Spindle cell tumor
  • Liver
  • Hepatectomy
  • Pathology
  • Immunostaining