Skip to main content
Surgical Case Reports
Download PDF

A case of strongly suspected Lynch syndrome with colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma

Surgical Case Reports volume 8, Article number: 114 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Neuroendocrine cell carcinomas (NEC) of the colon and rectum are uncommon, representing ~ 0.1% of all colorectal carcinomas. They are associated with a much worse prognosis compared to adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum, as death occurs in approximately half of all patients within 1 year. Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common cause of inherited colorectal cancer, accounting for 2–4% of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer cases. This case is extremely rare which was strongly suspected LS as the background, and NEC as the histological type of colorectal cancer.

Case presentation

The patient was a 44-year-old man presenting with vomiting as the main complaint. He had undergone ileocecal resection for cecal cancer at age 29. The diagnosis was obstructive descending colorectal cancer, and colonoscopy revealed tumors in the rectum and sigmoid colon in addition. Due to multiple occurrences of colorectal cancer and its prevalence in the patient’s family, LS was suspected. The operation which was a subtotal proctocolectomy was performed. Pathological analysis revealed complete curative resection and the descending colon cancer of the obstructed portion was at the most advanced pathological Stage IIIC in UICC TNM classification, and the tissue type was a NEC. The Ki-67 index was 70%. The results of the microsatellite instability (MSI) test showed high-frequency MSI. The BRAF V600E variant was negative. The immunoexpression of MLH1 was positive, MSH2 was negative, PMS2 was positive, and MSH6 was negative.

Conclusions

Extended surgery is recommended for incipient colorectal cancer in LS cases in order to reliably reduce the risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer. The survival outcome of surgery alone on digestive tract NECs, even locoregional lesions that are completely resection, is extremely poor. It is currently unclear if digestive tract NECs develop more readily in patients with LS. The accumulation of additional cases is necessary.

Background

Neuroendocrine cell carcinomas (NEC) of the colon and rectum are uncommon, representing ~ 0.1% of all colorectal carcinomas [1, 2]. They are associated with a much worse prognosis compared to adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum, as death occurs in approximately half of all patients within 1 year [3,4,5,6]. In the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, neuroendocrine tumors are staged on the basis of differentiation, grade, mitotic rate, and Ki-67 index [7].

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common cause of inherited colorectal cancer, accounting for 2–4% of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer cases [8]. This syndrome is characterized not only by colorectal cancer, but also by common development of extracolonic malignancies, including cancers in the endometrium, ovaries, gastrointestinal tract, and urinary tract [9,10,11,12]. This hereditary cancer syndrome is transmitted through an autosomal dominant pattern caused by germline mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, or in the epithelial-cell adhesion molecule gene [13, 14].

We report our experience with a patient who was strongly suspected to have LS with NEC.

Case presentation

The patient was a 44-year-old man presenting with vomiting as the main complaint. He had undergone ileocecal resection for cecal cancer at age 29. Abdominal CT showed thickening of the wall of the descending colon and dilation of the digestive tract. The diagnosis was obstructive descending colon cancer, and a colonic stent was inserted (Fig. 1). A colonoscopy revealed tumors in the rectum and sigmoid colon in addition (Fig. 2). Due to multiple occurrences of colorectal cancer and its prevalence in the patient’s family (his grandfather on his father’s side and mother died due to colon cancer, and his father underwent colon cancer at 49 years of age, and died due to duodenal cancer), LS was suspected. The operation which was a subtotal proctocolectomy with ileo-anal canal anastomosis and a temporary loop ileostomy were performed. Ascending colon cancer was also observed during surgery. Pathological analysis was complete curative resection and the descending colon cancer of the obstructed portion was at the most advanced pathological Stage IIIC in UICC TNM classification, and the tissue type was NEC. The tissue type of other lesions of rectal, sigmoid and ascending colon was adenocarcinoma, either. Anisonucleosis and mitosis of the NEC were observed by H&E staining. The Ki-67 index of the NEC was 70%, which suggests proliferative activity. By immunostaining, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56, which are all characteristic markers of NEC or neuroendocrine tumor (NET), were positive. CK7 was negative and CK20 was positive, indicating the NEC originating from colon (Fig. 3). SSTR2 expression was negative. The results of the microsatellite instability (MSI) test showed high-frequency MSI. The BRAF V600E variant was negative. The immunoexpression of MLH1 was positive, MSH2 was negative, PMS2 was positive, and MSH6 was negative. And LS was strongly suspected as was expected. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered by cisplatin and etoposide combination. The patient developed hypomagnesemia, and chemotherapy was halted after three courses. At 6 months postoperatively, there was no relapse and made for surgical closure of the ileostomy.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Abdominal CT and a colon stent. a-1 Contrast-enhanced peripheral wall enhancement (white arrow) was observed in the descending colon and splenic flexure. Dilation of the gastrointestinal tract was also observed. a-2 A colon stent was placed at the same site

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Colonoscopy findings. b-1 A circumferential type 2 tumor was observed in the descending colon. Categorized into Group 5 after biopsy. b-2 A colon stent was placed at the same site. b-3 A polyp was observed in the sigmoid colon. b-4 A type II tumor with a 75% circumference was observed in the rectum. Categorized into Group 5 after biopsy

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Pathological analysis. c-1-2 Greatly increased anisonucleosis and a high mitotic index were observed by H&E staining. A partial cord-like sequence was observed. c-3 Ki-67 was more than 70% positive. c-4 Synaptophysin was positive by immunostaining. c-5 Chromogranin A was positive by immunostaining. c-6 CD 56 was positive by immunostaining

Full size image

Discussion

There are options in the extent of colon resection when colorectal cancer caused due to LS. The extent of resection could be the same as would be chosen for sporadic colorectal cancer, or extended surgery (total colectomy, subtotal colectomy) could be performed [15]. Extended surgery is recommended for incipient colorectal cancer in LS cases in order to reliably reduce the risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer [15]. In this case, the operation was performed by a subtotal proctocolectomy. In the meta-analysis, metachronous colorectal cancer developed in 22.4–22.8% of cases with partial resection of the colon and in 4.7–6.8% of cases with extended surgery, which shows that partial resection of the colon significantly increases the risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer in LS [16].

This case fulfills the Amsterdam criteria II, as described below. At least three relatives (the patient’s father, mother, and grandfather) had with a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-associated cancer (colorectal cancer, cancer of endometrium, small bowel, ureter, or pelvis). The patient is a first-degree relative of the two, and two successive generations are affected. The patient diagnosed before age 50 years. Familial adenomatous polyposis was excluded in the colorectal cancer case. Tumor was verified by pathological examination [17]. And, by the revised Bethesda guidelines, this case should be tested for MSI, because the patient was in the following situation, as described below. In this case, colorectal cancer diagnosed in the patient who was less than 50 years of age. It is presence of synchronous, metachronous colorectal tumors. Colorectal cancer was diagnosed in one or more first-degree relatives (his father and mother) with an HNPCC-related tumor, and the patient and his father were diagnosed under age 50 years. Colorectal cancer was diagnosed in two or more first- or second-degree relatives (his father, mother, and grandfather) with HNPCC-related tumors, regardless of age [18].

It is important to rule out the possibility that the tumor of this patient might be MSI-high sporadic colorectal cancer for the diagnosis of LS. BRAF V600E variant gene rarely found in the case of LS even if MSI-high, and the testing of BRAF V600E variant gene has possibility to help the diagnosis of LS [19]. In this case, the BRAF V600E variant of the patient was negative, and it is not contradiction as LS. In this case, the pattern of immunohistochemical staining for MMR protein of MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6 suggested that predictive responsible gene was MSH2 (Fig. 4) [20]. Regarding the diagnosis of LS, it is essential to identify pathological germline MMR genes, and to prove that this patient has the germline MMR genes mutation [13, 14]. In this case, we recommended the patient to receive genetic counseling and the testing of the germline MMR genes at the specialized organization, and the patient went to consult genetic professional doctor and got genetic counseling. The patient was recommended the testing of the germline MMR genes. However, the testing is out of the insurance coverage, then, the patient refused to take the testing.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The pattern of immunohistochemical staining for MMR protein. The red line was the pattern of this case. And the pattern suggested that predictive responsible gene of this case was MSH2

Full size image

The tissue type of the descending colon cancer was NEC in this case, and the Ki-67 index was > 70%. Mitosis was observed in both the NET and NEC, but it was seen to a much greater extent in NEC. The Ki-67 index exceeded 20% in NET and NEC, but NEC tended to show abnormally high values in excess of 50%. With regard to SSTR2 expression, clear positive staining was observed in a non-localized manner in NET; however, in NEC, the findings were either weakly positive or negative [21]. The overall outcome of surgery alone on digestive tract NECs, even locoregional lesions that are completely excised, is extremely poor; the reported median overall survival is 14.7 months [22]. The median overall survival of the group under which the operation with multidisciplinary treatment such as perioperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy was slightly better than that of the operation alone group (20.4 months vs. 15.4 months, P = 0.08) [22]. With regard to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of digestive tract NECs, that evidence still have been not strong today. However, according to the guideline of NCCN (National comprehensive cancer network), ENETS (European neuroendocrine tumor society) and NANETS (North American neuroendocrine tumor society), cisplatin + etoposide, or cisplatin + irinotecan which are typical therapeutic regimens of small cell lung cancer are recommended for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of the digestive tract NECs with four to six courses [23,24,25].

Conclusions

This case is extremely rare which was strongly suspected LS as the background, and NEC as the histological type of colorectal cancer. It is currently unclear if digestive tract NECs develop more readily in patients with colorectal cancer with LS. The accumulation of additional cases is necessary.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

NEC:

Neuroendocrine cell carcinomas

NET:

Neuroendocrine tumor

LS:

Lynch syndrome

MMR:

Mismatch repair

MSI:

Microsatellite instability

HNPCC:

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

References

  1. Stelow EB, Moskaluk CA, Mills SE. The mismatch repair protein status of colorectal small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(11):1401–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Komatsubara K, Koinuma K, Miyakura Y, Horie H, Morimoto M, Ito H, et al. Endocrine cell carcinomas of the colon and rectum: a clinicopathological evaluation. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2016;9(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-015-0623-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernick PE, Klimstra DS, Shia J, Minsky B, Saltz L, Shi W, et al. Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:163–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Graffey MJ, Mills SE, Lack EE. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the colon and rectum. A clinicopathologic, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical study of 24 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1990;14(11):1010–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saclarides TJ, Szeluga D, Staren ED. Neuroendocrine cancers of the colon and rectum. Results of a ten-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(7):635–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burke AB, Shekitka KM, Sobin LH. Small cell carcinomas of the large intestine. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991;95:315–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Klimstra DS, Kloppel G, La Rosa S, et al. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasm of the digestive system. WHO Classification of Tumors Editorial Board, ed. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th edn, Vol.1, Digestive System Tumors. Lyon: WHO, 2019:16–21.

  8. Kim JY, Byeon J-S. Genetic counseling and surveillance focused on lynch syndrome. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2019;3(2):60–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lynch HT, de la Chapelle A. Hereditary colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(10):919–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sinicrope FA. Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(8):764–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burt RW, Disario JA, Cannon-Albright L. Genetics of colon cancer: impact of inheritance on colon cancer risk. Annu Rev Med. 1995;46:371–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lynch HT, Lynch PM, Lanspa SJ, Snyder CL, Lynch JF, Boland CR. Review of the lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications. Clin Genet. 2009;76(1):1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aaltonen LA, Salovaara R, Kristo P, Canzian F, Hemminki A, Peltomäki P, et al. Incidence of hereditary non polyposis colorectal cancer and feasibility of molecular screening for the disease. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(21):1481–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lynch HT, Snyder CL, Shaw TG, Heinen CD, Hitchins MP. Milestones of lynch syndrome: 1895–2015. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(3):181–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Anele CC, Adegbola SO, Askari A, Rajendran A, Clark SK, Latchford A, et al. Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer following colectomy in Lynch syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:528–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Malik SS, Lythgoe MP, McPhail M, Monahan KJ. Metachronous colorectal cancer following segmental or extended colectomy in Lynch syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam Cancer. 2018;17:557–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Park JG, Vasen HF, Park YJ, et al. Suspected HNPCC and Amsterdam criteria II: evaluation of mutation detection rate, an international collaborative study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002;17(2):109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Umar A, Boland CR, Terdiman JP, et al. Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:261–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McGivern A, Wynter CV, Whitehall VL, et al. Promoter hypermethylation frequency and BRAF mutations distinguish hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer from sporadic MSI-H colon cancer. Fam Cancer. 2004;3:101–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shia J, Tang LH, Vakiani E, et al. Immunohistochemistry as first-line screening for detecting colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: a 2-antibody panel may be as predictive as a 4-antibody panel. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:1639–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Konukiewitz B, Schlitter AM, Jesinghaus M, Pfister D, Steiger K, Segler A, et al. Somatostatin receptor expression related to TP53 and RB1 alterations in pancreatic and extrapancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm with Ki67-index above 20. Mod Pathol. 2017;30(4):587–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Conte B, George B, Overman M, Estrella J, Jiang Z-Q, Sarshekeh AM, et al. High-grade neuroendocrine colorectal carcinomas: a retrospective study of 100 patients. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15(2):e1-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. NCCN guidelines, version 2. 2018. Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma/large or small cell (other than lung) (PDNEC-1).

  24. Garcia-Carbonero R, Sorbye H, Baudin E, et al. Vienna consensus conference participants. ENETS consensus guidelines for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103(2):186–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Strosberg JR, Coppola D, Klimstra DS, Phan AT, Kulke MH, Wiseman GA, et al. The NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of poorly differentiated (high-grade) extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Pancreas. 2010;39(6):799–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants for their involvement in this report.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Iwaki City Medical Center, 16 Kusehara, Uchigomimayamachi, Iwaki-shi, Fukushima, 973-8555, Japan

    Naoya Kobayashi, Hiroshi Yoshida, Shinya Kawaguchi, Satoru Shiraso, Noriko Nemoto, Nanako Fujikawa, Yoichi Haji, Emiko Kono, Shoji Kokubo, Kazuhiko Tsukuda & Fumiaki Shinya

  2. Department of Pathology, Iwaki City Medical Center, Iwaki-shi, Japan

    Shigeyuki Asano

Authors
  1. Naoya Kobayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroshi Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shinya Kawaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Satoru Shiraso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Noriko Nemoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nanako Fujikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yoichi Haji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Emiko Kono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shoji Kokubo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kazuhiko Tsukuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Shigeyuki Asano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Fumiaki Shinya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Manuscript drafted by NK. NK and HY performed treatment and management of the patient. SK, SS, NN, NF, YH, EK, SK, KT and FS carried out medical patient care and revised the manuscript. SA was in charge of pathological diagnosis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoya Kobayashi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This case report was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of our institution and our national standards.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobayashi, N., Yoshida, H., Kawaguchi, S. et al. A case of strongly suspected Lynch syndrome with colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma. surg case rep 8, 114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01471-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01471-0

Keywords