- Case Report
- Open Access
Successful separation of male pygopagus with anal canal and urethral reconstruction: a case report
Surgical Case Reports volume 8, Article number: 43 (2022)
Pygopagus is a type of conjoined twin binding at the buttocks. Some cases of pygopagus involve the fusion of the gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, and spinal cord. Few cases of male pygopagus have been reported; however, the prognosis after separation is unclear. Herein, we report a case of male pygopagus in which successful separation was performed with the reconstruction of the anal canal.
Twins with male pygopagus were born at 35 weeks by cesarean section. They shared a common anus, penis, and scrotum with four testes. The infants had normal defecation and urination after birth. The separation surgery was scheduled when they were 5 months. Two distinct anesthesia teams and four surgical teams (neurosurgery, pediatric urology, plastic surgery, and pediatric surgery) were involved in the multidisciplinary approach. After separating the spinal cord, we found that the anal canal and sphincter muscle complex were fused near the anal aperture, and we separated them. The fused penis and testis were separated and reconstructed using the same incisional line as the other separation, and the reconstructions of the anal canals with the sphincter muscle complex were completed. Both patients had an uneventful postoperative course. At 2 years of age, they could walk and defecate independently. In addition, they voided spontaneously without urinary incontinence at the time of 3 years and 11 months.
Separation of the spinal cord with anal canal and urethral reconstruction is important for male pygopagus patients as it allows them to preserve their independent function.
Conjoined twins occur at a rate of approximately 1 in 50,000–200,000 deliveries, with a female-to-male ratio of approximately 1:3. Pygopagus is a twin type of binding at the buttocks and accounts for approximately 20% of all conjoined twins [1,2,3]. In pygopagus patients, 6–19% of all cases have connected gastrointestinal tract, pelvis, urinary tract, and nerves [3,4,5]. Patients with male pygopagus have rarely been reported . The survival rate of all pygopagus is good; however, poor prognosis in terms of motor functions of the lower limbs, defecation, and urination disorders has been reported [3, 6]. The functional prognosis for male pygopagus patients is unknown.
There are various types of bowel fusion in pygopagus, including fusion from the small intestine to the anus or only anal fusion . Almost all of these cases have a fused anal canal; however, there are few detailed reports on the sphincter muscle complex and puborectalis. Separation and reconstruction of the fused organs, including the anal canal, spinal cord, and urogenital organs, must be performed while preserving their postoperative functions . Therefore, surgery should be precise and be conducted with a multidisciplinary approach by surgeons and anesthesiologists with abundant experience in their fields.
Herein, we report a case of successful separation surgery in male pygopagus with multimodality surgical teams.
A 34-year-old woman, who conceived via in vitro fertilization, received the diagnosis following fetal ultrasound screening at 11 weeks and confirmed by magnetic resornance image (MRI) at 16 weeks of pregnancy. The images revealed the connection between the sacrum and a continuous spinal canal; however, they had separate intra-abdominal organs.
Twins with male pygopagus were born at 35 weeks by cesarean section, with a combined birth weight of 4690 g. At birth, the infants had no signs of distress. They shared one anus, one penis, and one scrotum with four testes (Fig. 1a–d, respectively). Defecation and urination after birth were normal. MRI showed that the twins had a fused sacrum, and their spinal cords shared one continuous tube (Fig. 2a). They had a short common anus and rectum (Fig. 2b). Computed tomography (CT) revealed two bladders, rectums, livers, and spleens (Fig. 2c). Additional evaluation of urinary tract showed that twin A had horseshoe kidney and twin B had unilateral vesicoureteral reflux (grade 3). Separation was scheduled when the infants were 5 months. The surgery aimed to separate the sacrum, spinal canal, fused rectum, fused penis, and scrotum while preserving their functions.
Two different anesthesia teams and four surgical teams (neurosurgery, pediatric urology, plastic surgery, and pediatric surgery) were involved. Detailed surgical procedures were discussed twice using a preoperative 3D model (Fig. 2d).
In the operating room, the twins were first intubated, and central venous catheters were inserted by the respective anesthesiologists. The placement of the anesthetic instruments was designed to enable preparation for intraoperative repositioning and post-separation position, as reported in detail by Sato et al. . Urinary catheters were placed into each twin’s bladder using cystourethrography under general anesthesia. Each bladder was not trabeculated, and bladder neck was closed. Common urethra was not wide and extended to the external urethral meatus. We planned the separation beginning from the superior organ toward the inferior organ to avoid contamination due to rectal and penis separation.
The patients were placed in the prone position. After the sacrum was separated, a fused nerve root was confirmed within the spinal canal (Fig. 3a). Neurosurgeons separated the fused spinal cord and nerve roots using microscopy and neuro-physical intraoperative monitoring and repaired the dura mater. Details of the surgical separation of conjoined spinal cords of this case have been reported by Yokota et al. . After spinal cord separation, we detected the fusion of the two rectums near the anal aperture (Fig. 3b). Their sphincters and puborectalis were partially shared; therefore, they were separated using an anal stimulator with keen attention to their morphology. Similarly, the fused penises and urethra were separated (Fig. 3c). Four cavernous bodies were detected in the fused penis, which were divided into two pairs of bodies. The pendulous urethrae were separated equally between both infants and peeled off to the bifurcation of the bulbar urethrae. After confirming that the spermatic cords of both infants were not crossed, the scrotums were separated at the same incision line as the skin. Each perineal urethrostomy was created, because each separated urethra was not wide enough to perform single stage urethroplasty. The urethral plate and penile skin were sutured with Byar’s flap to wrap the penises. The scrotums were reconstructed with the Dartos fascia, and the skin was closed (Fig. 3d). The dissected rectum and anal canal were reconstructed to pass through the sphincter and puborectalis (Fig. 3e). The position of the neo-anus was detected and placed on the separation line using a muscle stimulator. Finally, a transverse colostomy was performed to cover the anus.
Both patients had an uneventful postoperative course. They had no motor dysfunction of the lower limb and no obvious urinary incontinence, and they underwent a stoma closure surgery 4 months later. Nine months later, they underwent tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for hypospadias. Eighteen months after separation, both children could walk alone (Fig. 4a). The scars were clear, without complications (Fig. 4b), and external urethral orifices and anal apertures were confirmed (Fig. 4c). They had bowel movements once daily by enema without soiling. They voided spontaneously without urinary incontinence at the time of 3 years and 11 months.
We reported a rare case of male pygopagus who underwent successful separation surgery with anal canal and urethral reconstruction following a multidisciplinary approach. The infants had preserved defecation, urination, and lower limb function.
Male pygopagus is very rare, and well-documented cases are shown in Table 1 [1, 7, 11,12,13]. In almost all cases, the intestines and urinary tracts were connected, and two of five cases had neural connections. Although most cases did not describe the postoperative function in detail, two cases, including our case, had no functional impairment or lower limb paralysis.
Reconstruction of the anal canal and urethra in a pygopagus patient was only reported by Liu et al.  in a case, wherein the sphincter muscle in a female pygopagus patient could contract normally and could be considered the normal sphincter muscle. The surgeon incised the common anal canal longitudinally through the middle to give each baby half of the sphincter muscles. Both patients were continent and had no constipation or soiling problems. In our cases, a similar reconstruction of the sphincter muscle was performed with a male pygopagus condition, and good prognoses were achieved. Although there are few previous reports on urinary tract reconstruction, we performed a reconstruction using Byar’s flap method, and our patients had no obvious dysuria. We conclude that long-term follow-up of our patients is necessary.
Can et al. reported the usefulness of a multidisciplinary approach for treating female pygopagus in Vietnam . Our treatment approach was also similar as several meetings were conducted preoperatively regarding the operation with experienced surgeons and anesthesiologists. Detailed surgical procedures were simulated by multidisciplinary teams using a 3D model. Therefore, we successfully separated the conjoined twins without any serious complications. Postoperative functions of the lower extremities, including urination and defecation, were preserved.
Precise evaluation and surgical technique for fused organs in male pygopagus patients are important for successful morphological and functional separation.
Surgery involving anal canal and urethral reconstruction using a multidisciplinary approach is important for male pygopagus patients as it enables preservation of postoperative functions.
Availability of data and materials
Magnetic resonance imaging
El Gohary MA, Khoury I, Shrama S, Zaki A. Surgical separation of a rare case of male pygopagus. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009;19:402–4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1202855.
Chou YC, Peng HC, Chu CH, Tsai ST, Ling JCM, Hsu YH, et al. Successful separation of the conjoined thecal sac with an epidermal cyst in pygopagus twins. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:e25–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.05.023.
Fieggen AG, Dunn RN, Pitcher RD, Millar AJW, Rode H, Peter JC. Ischiopagus and pygopagus conjoined twins: neurosurgical considerations. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20:640–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-004-0987-2.
Hirokazu T, Takayuki I, Yoshinori H, Kazunari K, Akio A, Keiji K. Separation surgery of pygopagus asymmetrical conjoined twins sharing U-shaped spinal cord: case report and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29:699–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-2007-2.
Janik JS, Hendrickson RJ, Janik JP, Bensard DD, Partrick DA, Karrer FM. Spectrum of anorectal anomalies in pygopagus twins. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:608–12. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2003.50132.
Awasthi R, Iyengar R, Rege S, Jain N. Surgical management of pygopagus conjoined twins with spinal bifida. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(Suppl 4):S560–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3707-y.
Saguil E, Almonte J, Baltazar W, Acosta A, Caballes A, Catangui A, et al. Conjoined twins in the Philippines: experience of a single institution. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25:775–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2426-7.
Liu X, Dong K, Zheng S, Xiao X, Shen C, Dong C, et al. Separation of pygopagus, omphalopagus, and ischiopagus with the aid of three-dimensional models. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53:682–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.06.016.
Sato Y, Iura A, Kawamoto Y, Yamamoto S, Iritakenishi T, Fujino Y. Successful anesthetic management of separation surgery for pygopagus conjoined twins: a case report. JA Clin Rep. 2021;7:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-020-00406-8.
Yokota C, Kagawa N, Bamba Y, Tazuke Y, Kitabatake Y, Nakagawa T, et al. Successful neurosurgical separation of conjoined spinal cords in pygopagus twins: illustrative cases. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3171/CASE218.
Leelanukrom R, Somboonviboon W, Bunburaphong P, Kiatkungwanklai P. Anaesthetic experiences in three sets of conjoined twins in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14:176–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01131.x.
Ventura N, Huguet R, Ey A, Montaner A, Lizarraga I, Vives E. Infantile idiopathic scoliosis in the newborn. Int Orthop. 1998;22:82–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640050214.
Hr L. Spinal Joint Time Mag. 1956;30:35.
Can DDT, Lepard JR, Tri TT, Van Duong T, Thuy NT, Thach PN, et al. The growth of pediatric neurosurgery in southern Vietnam and the first separation of pygopagus twins: case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020;25:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.11.PEDS19291.
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
The authors declare that they have not received any funding for this report.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the appropriate version of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
Informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patients for the publication of this report.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Toyama, C., Nomura, M., Tazuke, Y. et al. Successful separation of male pygopagus with anal canal and urethral reconstruction: a case report. surg case rep 8, 43 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01398-6
- Conjoined twin
- Anal canal