- Case Report
- Open access
- Published:
Bowel obstruction and perforation secondary to barbed suture after minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: report of two cases and literature review
Surgical Case Reports volume 7, Article number: 161 (2021)
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch (TAPP) is now commonly used in the repair of inguinal hernia. Barbed suture can be a fast and effective method of peritoneal closure. We report two rare cases of small bowel obstruction and perforation caused by barbed suture after TAPP.
Cases
Patient 1 is a 45-year-old man who underwent laparoscopic repair of a right inguinal hernia. Barbed suture was used to close the peritoneal defect. At 47 days after the operation, he was diagnosed with a small bowel obstruction caused by an elongated tail of the barbed suture. Emergency laparoscopic exploration was performed for removal of the embedded suture and detorsion of the volvulus. The second patient is a 50-year-old man who was admitted with a small bowel perforation one week after TAPP herniorrhaphy. Emergency exploration revealed that the tail of the barbed suture had pierced the small intestine, causing a tiny perforation. After cutting and releasing the redundant tail of the barbed suture, the serosal and muscular defect was closed with 2 absorbable single-knot sutures. Both patients have recovered well. Finally, we searched the PubMed database and reviewed the literature on the effectiveness and safety of barbed suture for TAPP.
Conclusions
Surgeons should understand the characteristics of barbed suture and master the technique of peritoneum closure during TAPP in order to reduce the risk of bowel obstruction and perforation.
Background
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch (TAPP) is now commonly used in the repair of inguinal hernias [1, 2]. In order to avoid adhesions between the bowel and the patch and to prevent bowel obstruction due to herniation into the preperitoneal space [3, 4], the peritoneum must be closed continuously and completely after the patch is placed.
Barbed suture is a unidirectionally barbed, self-anchored, non-slip suture that is now widely used in skin repair [5, 6], digestive tract reconstruction, and obstetrics and gynecology [7,8,9]. Barbed suture is also favored for laparoscopic hernia repair because there is no need to tie knots at the end of the suture. These barbs can also be fixed in the peritoneum to firmly repair the peritoneal defect [10].
With the introduction of new technologies, complications will eventually arise. Here, we present two cases of bowel obstruction and perforation after TAPP repair, which were both related to the barbed suture. We also review the recent literature to provide some objective suggestions for the future.
Case presentation
Case 1: bowel strangulation caused by barbed suture
A 45-year-old man with swelling in the right groin due to indirect hernia (Fig. 1a). TAPP repair was performed by an experienced surgeon and the peritoneal defect was closed with a 4-0 absorbable monofilament barbed suture (V-loc™, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) from right to left, leaving a residual tail of about 5 mm (Fig. 1b).
The patient was discharged on the first day after surgery but was readmitted on the following day because of abdominal pain and vomiting. The CT scan at readmission showed a small bowel obstruction with possible ileal volvulus (Fig. 1c). Although the symptoms resolved spontaneously after 2 days of fasting and rehydration, the patient continued to have intermittent abdominal pain and he was readmitted again on postoperative day 47 with worsening abdominal pain. The CT showed dilated small bowel with the mesentery rotating around the mesenteric vessels, which prompted suspicion of small bowel obstruction with strangulation (Fig. 1d). Emergency laparoscopic exploration revealed that the tail of the barbed suture was much longer and was embedded in the small bowel mesentery, causing volvulus obstruction (Fig. 1e, f). We cut the residual end of the barbed suture and removed the embedded tail of the barbed suture from the mesentery. The patient was discharged on the fourth postoperative day.
Case 2: perforation of the small intestine due to the barbed suture
A 50-year-old man presented with a preoperative CT diagnosis of a right direct inguinal hernia (Fig. 2a). TAPP repair was performed by a trainee surgeon, and the peritoneal defect was closed from left to right with V-loc™ (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA). The residual tail was < 1 cm (Fig. 2b). At 1 week after surgery, the patient developed unremitting abdominal pain, and the symptoms continued to worsen. On the 10th day, the CT scan showed obvious edema of the small intestine, which was possible ileal volvulus (Fig. 2c). There was free air as well as ascites in the abdominal cavity, indicating bowel perforation (Fig. 2d). At emergency laparoscopic exploration, we found that the elongated tail of the barbed suture had pierced into the small intestine (Fig. 2e). After cutting and releasing the redundant barbed suture and removing the tail of the barbed suture, the serosal and muscular defect was closed with 2 absorbable single-knot sutures. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the 7th postoperative day. Both patients have recovered well.
Discussion
TAPP is generally very safe and minimally invasive [11]. However, postoperative intestinal obstruction occurs occasionally, usually because of adhesions between the bowel and the mesh or due to an internal hernia through the peritoneal defects [3, 10]. Therefore, the exact closure of peritoneal defects is an indispensable procedure of TAPP surgery. Traditional peritoneal closure methods include tacks, clips, staples, strap devices, etc. [4], but these may damage the nerves of the abdominal wall and increase the risk of postoperative chronic pain. The placement of running sutures for closing the peritoneal defect is one of the surgical techniques that must be mastered in TAPP [12]. However, intra-abdominal suturing is time-consuming and technically demanding.
The barbed suture is self-anchored and there is no need for knots. It promises an innovative technology for closing an incision faster without compromising strength and safety. This revolutionary product is now widely used in minimally invasive surgery [13, 14]. But new products cannot always be perfect. Recently, reports of related complications have been published [4, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
We searched on PubMed with keywords including barbed suture, complication, and TAPP, and found a total of eight case reports from 2012 to 2021. The onset time varies from 1 day to 3 months after surgery [18, 21, 22]. The main manifestations are abdominal pain and vomiting, and the later onset cases mainly manifest as uninterrupted abdominal pain or abdominal distension with worsening symptoms [17]. In the first case we experienced, the patient presented with unexplained vomiting and abdominal pain on the second day after surgery. However, due to lack of experience, we did not expect intestinal obstruction caused by the barbed suture. In a total of 9 cases in the literature, a tail of barbed suture has been seen penetrating into the mesentery, causing intestinal torsion, and ultimately leading to bowel obstruction. At press, none of the patients had lasting damage to the intestine (Table 1).
Reports of intestinal perforation following hernia repair are rare. Necrotic perforation has been reported in tack fixation [23]. In our second patient, the suture tail had penetrated directly into the bowel wall, resulting in a tiny perforation, which was closed with a simple suture of 2 stitches, and the mesh patch was not infected.
To investigate further, we reviewed the operation videos and discovered that the tail stump was actually < 1 cm during the first operation, but at the second operation the tail stump was 4–5 cm long. Similar findings have been reported in other cases [15, 18], and even if the tail was in accordance with the instructions, the barbed suture would still extend automatically. This result has also been well documented during in vitro animal experiments [16]. It is possible that as the peritoneum contracts during healing the barbed suture tail is squeezed out unidirectionally [16]. Once the tail of the barbed suture penetrates the mesentery or the bowel wall, the unidirectional anchoring characteristic would further increase the length of the involved suture as intestinal peristalsis increases.
Avoiding this complication is something that surgeons need to take seriously. Some experts suggest that the barbed suture tail needs to be sutured back with two stitches, so that the barbed suture is completely self-anchored [24]. However, animal in vitro experiments have shown that in addition to the free tail of the barbed suture, the barb itself could also hook the bowel [24]. Therefore, some surgeons routinely place anti-adhesion agents at the barbed suture site in the Japanese literature.
Even when the barbed suture is cut short enough as recommended [16], bowel obstruction or perforation can still occur in TAPP. Eliminating this risk completely remains a challenge for surgeons. We have summarized some precautions that should be considered when using barbed sutures: (1) the surgeon can appropriately reduce the pneumoperitoneum pressure when closing the peritoneal defect, thereby reducing the risk of peritoneal tears; (2) the surgeon can tighten the tail as much as possible so that the peritoneal folds can cover the barbs that are exposed to the abdominal cavity; (3) placing two back stitches at the end of the barbed suture to make sure they anchor accurately; (4) shortening the free barbed tails and not exposing the stump of the tail to the abdominal cavity. Random trials are needed to verify the effectiveness of routine use of anti-adhesion agents.
Conclusion
Surgeons should understand the characteristics of barbed suture and master the technique of peritoneum closure during TAPP in order to reduce the risk of bowel obstruction and perforation.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.
Abbreviations
- TAPP:
-
Transabdominal preperitoneal patch
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- US:
-
Ultrasonography
References
HerniaSurge G. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018;22(1):1–165.
Kapiris SA, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017patients. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(9):972–5.
Patri P, et al. V-Loc, a new wound closure device for peritoneal closure—is it safe? A comparative study of different peritoneal closure systems. Surg Innov. 2011;18(2):145–9.
Kohler G, et al. Small bowel obstruction after TAPP repair caused by a self-anchoring barbed suture device for peritoneal closure: case report and review of the literature. Hernia. 2015;19(3):389–94.
Abboud NM, et al. A new suturing method for optimal wound healing: technique and experience. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2020;2(1):ojaa008.
Murtha AP, et al. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1769–80.
Hara K, et al. An easy and reliable method to close Petersen’s defect using barbed suture to prevent internal hernia from developing after gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020;13(2):238–41.
Ota Y, et al. A suturing method without exposure of barbs on the wound surface using a unidirectional barbed monofilament absorbable suture (STRATAFIX) in laparoscopic myomectomy: a feasibility study. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021;10(2):104–8.
Hamamoto H, et al. Closure of enterotomy after side-to-side ileocolic anastomosis with two barbed sutures in totally laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided colon cancer. Surg Today. 2021;51(3):457–61.
Chihara N, et al. Absorbable barbed suture device for laparoscopic peritoneal closure after hernia repair via the transabdominal preperitoneal approach: a single-center experience with 257 cases. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019;12(2):162–6.
Bittner R, et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc. 2015;29(2):289–321.
Takayama S, et al. Use of barbed suture for peritoneal closure in transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;4(7):177–9.
Albert TT, Vaillant JC, Genser L. Early small bowel volvulus after gastric bypass: think about barbed sutures! J Visc Surg. 2021;158(2):187–8.
Chen H, Hong MK, Ding DC. Acute small bowel obstruction caused by barbed suture on the second day after laparoscopic hysterosacropexy: a case report and literature review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(2):247–9.
Filser J, et al. Small bowel volvulus after transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair due to improper use of V-Loc barbed absorbable wire—do we always “read the instructions first”? Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;8C:193–5.
Sakata S, et al. Are we burying our heads in the sand? Preventing small bowel obstruction from the V-loc(R) suture in laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17(9):O180–3.
Man Y, et al. Recurrent abdominal pain due to small bowel volvulus after transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(15):3696–703.
Buchs NC, et al. Intestinal obstruction following use of laparoscopic barbed suture: a new complication with new material? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21(5):369–71.
Tagliaferri EM, et al. Small bowel obstruction SBO after TAPP repair caused by a self-anchoring barbed suture device for peritoneal closure: case report. J Surg Case Rep. 2018;2018(7):rjy165.
Sartori A, et al. Small bowel occlusion after trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia approach caused by barbed suture: case report and review of literature. G Chir. 2019;40(4):322–4.
Zipple MK, et al. Small bowel obstruction secondary to barbed suture after minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg. 2020;86(1):e14–6.
Zheng L, et al. Case report: small bowel obstruction owing to self-anchoring barbed suture device after TAPP repair. Front Surg. 2021;8:646091.
Peach G, Tan LC. Small bowel obstruction and perforation due to a displaced spiral tacker: a rare complication of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2008;12(3):303–5.
Stabile G, et al. Case report: bowel occlusion following the use of barbed sutures in abdominal surgery. A single-center experience and literature review. Front Surg. 2021;8:626505.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the experts of BioMed Proofreading LLC for English copyediting.
Funding
This study was not supported by any outside research funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LMW drafted the manuscript and provided the original pictures. TM, SF, SN, DY, and TK reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L., Maejima, T., Fukahori, S. et al. Bowel obstruction and perforation secondary to barbed suture after minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: report of two cases and literature review. surg case rep 7, 161 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-021-01249-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-021-01249-w