In cadaveric pancreas transplantations, the pancreas graft is ectopically transplanted into the retroperitoneal space or at the iliac fossa, and the duodenum of the pancreas graft is anastomosed to the small bowel (enteric drainage; ED) or the bladder (bladder drainage; BD) to provide pancreatic exocrine drainage. The ED of pancreatic exogenous fluid is the more physiologic technique and has a lower risk of urinary tract infections (UTI) [1, 2]. However, ED may lead to an intraabdominal abscess or peritonitis if anastomotic leaks occur. In contrast, the BD anastomosis can be performed in the retroperitoneal space. In addition, the function of the pancreatic graft can be monitored by measuring urinary amylase levels. However, BD may lead to metabolic acidosis, volume depletion secondary to sodium bicarbonate wasting, reflux pancreatitis, UTI, and hematuria [1]. Severe UTIs caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria can occur after BD-SPK [3], and the rate of urinary retention after renal transplantation has been reported to be 5.8% [4]. Therefore, the ED method is currently selected during pancreas transplantations in 90% of the transplant centers in Japan as recent developments in immunosuppressive therapies have decreased the risk of acute rejection, and ED has been reported to result in more favorable outcomes than BD [5,6,7,8]. Furthermore, a high rate of conversion surgery from BD to ED (20–25%) due to complications of UTI or hematuria has been reported [9].
This patient had a concomitant spindle-shaped abdominal aortic aneurysm with a diameter of 3.3 cm at the time of the SPK, and an annual growth of 0.5 cm indicated the requirement of treatment. We performed an artificial vascular graft replacement to the aneurysm prior to the pancreas and kidney implantations in order to avoid low blood flow to the grafts when the aneurysm replacement was performed after the SPK. The BD method was selected on the pancreas engrafting as it has a lower risk of intraperitoneal infection compared to ED. The vascular graft infection is one of the serious complications with high mortality and morbidity rate. Once infected, early mortality rate has been reported 24 to 45% [10,11,12,13], and infected artificial vascular graft needs to be completely removed with extra-anatomic bypass grafting.
Following the SPK with BD, our patient was followed up with monthly blood tests and urine amylase checks. One and a half years after the transplantation, the patient presented with lower abdominal pain, which we diagnosed as pancreatitis and leakage from the duodenal stump of the pancreas graft into the peritoneal cavity caused by urinary retention related to a neurogenic bladder. While a urodynamic study can be used to evaluate bladder function, we do not regularly perform this study in the posttransplant period [14]. There are currently no guidelines regarding the frequency of urodynamic studies. However, the evaluation of the bladder function in this patient may have prevented the pancreatitis or the duodenal stump leak.
Urinary drainage with an indwelling catheter is the standard first-line treatment for leaks from the duodenal stump after SPK with BD. Surgical repair is not always necessary to treat late-onset leakage or fistulas after SPK [2]. However, the indwelling catheter did not lead to a resolution of the fistula in this patient. As reported [15], we endoscopically inserted a pancreatic tube, which allowed for the drainage of the graft pancreatic juice, but did not resolve the leak in the duodenal stump of the pancreas graft. Given the fact that patient had not been suffering from the leakage during 18 months after the operation, the onset of the leakage from the duodenum stump might be mainly due to neurogenic bladder. Prolonged high pressure in the bladder may prevent blood supply to the stump of the duodenum. Poor blood supply and/or high level of amylase concentration generally impedes healing fistula [16]. Finally, we percutaneously and directly injected 50% NBCA at the site of the leak, which resulted in the complete closure of the fistula without any adverse effects. NBCA is a tissue adhesive and is usually mixed with iodized oil. It is a tissue monomer that instantly polymerizes upon contact with body fluids. NBCA is used to stop bleeding and close postoperative fistulas [17]. In addition, embolization using NBCA has been reported for the treatment of esophageal gastric varices, suture failures, pancreatic fluid leaks, and bile leaks [17,18,19,20,21]. NBCA has been approved to be used as an endoscopic hemostatic agent for gastric varices and as a tissue adhesive for the skin. The injections of NBCA may induce local pain, infection, and even embolism when injected incorrectly into blood vessels. All procedures used in the NBCA injection were approved by the Ethical Committee of Hokkaido University Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from the patient before the treatment with NBCA. This case demonstrates that NBCA can be used to treat refractory duodenal stump leakages. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of successful percutaneous direct injection of NBCA to treat refractory fistulas.
In conclusion, leaks from the duodenal stump of a pancreas graft can occur after an SPK. The percutaneous direct injection of NBCA to the site of the leak can be used to treat this complication.