Skip to main content

A case of vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome with a ruptured hepatic artery after surgical treatment of peritonitis caused by the perforation of the colon



Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) is an inherited disorder that causes connective tissue fragility. The vascular type of EDS (vEDS) caused by defective collagen type III production accounts for 5%–10% of all EDS cases. Patients can develop gastrointestinal or arterial ruptures, which cause poor prognosis. We report a case of a patient who experienced colonic rupture, which was immediately followed by arterial rupture.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old man who had been genetically diagnosed with vEDS 6 years previously was admitted to our hospital with ischemic colitis. After 3 days of conservative treatment, his abdominal pain worsened, and computed tomography (CT) revealed free air in the abdominal cavity. Pan-peritonitis due to perforation of the sigmoid colon was diagnosed. Intraperitoneal lavage and drainage and Hartmann’s operation were urgently performed. Because the patient had confirmed vEDS, we performed the surgery in a protective manner. The postoperative course was initially good, and he was transferred to the general ward 3 days after surgery. However, 5 days after surgery, massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage suddenly occurred, and contrast-enhanced CT showed an aneurysm in the common hepatic artery that had ruptured; this aneurysm was not present before surgery and was far from the surgical field. Although we considered an emergency operation, the patient suddenly experienced cardiac arrest and was unresponsive to resuscitation.


In cases of vEDS, vascular rupture can occur immediately after surgery for intestinal rupture. We recommend paying special attention to vascular complications in patients in their forties, as such complications are the most common causes of death.


Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease in which abnormal collagen metabolism causes systemic connective tissue fragility in the skin, joints, blood vessels, and other structures. There are six distinct types of EDS: classical, hypermobile, vascular, kyphoscoliosis, arthrochalasia, and dermatosparaxis [1]. These differ in severity, are associated with different organs, and affect patient well-being by inducing various clinical symptoms. Among them, the vascular type of EDS (vEDS), which accounts for 5%–10% of all EDS cases [2], has the worst prognosis owing to its high potential for arterial rupture and gastrointestinal perforation; its estimated prevalence is 1:50,000 [3]. It is caused by a mutation in COL3A1, which affects type III procollagen synthesis [4,5,6].

COL3A1 is the only gene implicated in vEDS to date. In a typical vEDS case, its mutation results in abnormal production of type III procollagen and consequent tissue fragility, as well as arterial rupture and dissection, gastrointestinal perforation, uterine rupture in women, and other characteristic features. We report a case of a man with confirmed vEDS who died from a hepatic artery rupture triggered by a 2-cm perforation of the sigmoid colon.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with a chief complaint of lower abdominal pain and melena. His medical history included surgery for acute brachiocephalic dissection at the age of 17 years. He was diagnosed with vEDS by genetic testing, which found missense variants in COL3A1, while hospitalized for symptoms associated with hemothorax at the age of 34. He had no family history of vEDS; however, his mother had died suddenly due to acute aortic dissection.

At our hospital, he was diagnosed with ischemic colitis and conservatively treated by fasting and with antibiotics. Three days after hospital admission, his symptoms exacerbated, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed intraperitoneal free air and thickening and thinning of the sigmoid colon wall (Fig. 1). Pan-peritonitis caused by the ischemic colitis and consequent perforation of the sigmoid colon was diagnosed. An emergency operation was performed, and contamination of the abdominal cavity with feces was intraoperatively revealed. Moreover, the colonic wall was thinned and edematous, the tissue color was poor from the descending colon to the sigmoid colon, and a 2-cm perforation was observed in the sigmoid colon (Fig. 2). As we expected, the tissue was very fragile and bled easily; hence, we performed the surgery more protectively than usual. We resected the descending colon and sigmoid colon, washed the abdominal cavity with 10 L of saline, and constructed a colostomy in the transverse colon. We confirmed the upper abdominal cavity during intraperitoneal lavage, but no obvious organ damage including common hepatic artery was observed. We confirmed sufficient hemostasis and placed two prophylactic drain tubes at the rectovesical pouch and left subdiaphragm. Macroscopically, a perforation was found in the sigmoid colon (Fig. 3a). Microscopically, infiltration of inflammatory cells and rupture of the muscular layer were observed, and collagen fibers in the submucosal layer tended to be slightly thin (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 1

Abdominal computed tomography findings on the third day after patient admission to the hospital for abdominal pain. Wall thickening and thinning of the sigmoid colon (white arrows) and free gas in the abdominal cavity (white triangles) are observed

Fig. 2

Intraoperative findings. A 2-cm perforation is found in the sigmoid colon

Fig. 3

a Perforated sigmoid colon. b Infiltration of inflammatory cells and rupture of the muscular layer (white triangles) are observed, and collagen fibers in the submucosal layer tend to be slightly thin

After the operation, the patient entered the intensive care unit and was managed systemically. Because there were no initial drain-related problems, he was moved to the general ward 3 days after surgery. Five days after surgery, bleeding from the abdominal drainage tube suddenly occurred, and the patient had low blood pressure and was unconscious. Enhanced CT revealed a common hepatic aneurysm rupture that was not present before the surgery (Fig. 4). We considered emergency surgery or intravascular treatment, but the patient went into cardiopulmonary arrest, did not respond to resuscitation, and died.

Fig. 4

Abdominal computed tomography findings on the fifth day after surgical sigmoid colon resection and colostomy construction. An aneurysm in the common hepatic artery (white arrow) and extravasation (white triangles) are observed


The most significant point in this case is that the vascular ruptured occurred immediately after surgery for intestinal rupture. Intestinal and vascular ruptures are common complications in patients with vEDS. In fact, Pepin et al. reported that 15% of patients with vEDS with intestinal complications had vascular complications during follow-up [3], and Watanabe et al. also reported that 66% of Japanese patients with vEDS have intestinal and vascular complications [7]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of vEDS in a patient who experienced intestinal complications, which was immediately followed by vascular complications. In this case, no aneurysm was found on preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominal CT, indicating that gastrointestinal surgery for pan-peritonitis triggered the vascular complication. It is well known that vascular complications can develop after endovascular treatment [8,9,10]. Horowitz et al. observed splenic artery and cardiac ruptures with unknown causes 3 and 21 days after endovascular treatment, respectively, and referred these events as “remote vascular catastrophes” [11]. The exact cause of the catastrophes is unknown, but elevated collagenase activity after invasive treatment may be a potential culprit [12]. In this case, two major invasions, surgical colon resection and pan-peritonitis, were added to the patient; thus, it is possible that there was a potential increase in collagenase activity. In addition, it cannot be denied that light traction or exclusion was applied to the upper abdominal cavity around common hepatic artery, but finally, we confirmed that there was no obvious organ damage. Thus, the vascular complication in our patient may be a remote vascular catastrophe caused by surgery for pan-peritonitis. He had no aneurysm before surgery, so performing contrast-enhanced CT after surgery might help detect such remote vascular catastrophes.

We should pay special attention to vascular complications in patients in their forties. The average age of death from vEDS is 48 years [3]. Intestinal rupture is a serious complication in patients with vEDS, but is rarely fatal with proper treatment [3]. In fact, most causes of death in patients with vEDS are related to vascular rupture, and bowel rupture accounts for 8% of all vEDS patient deaths [3]. Surgical mortality is reported to be 7% [13]. Vascular complication is often fatal. Thus, given the average life expectancy of patients with vEDS, we should pay attention to vascular complications in patients. Our patient had taken celiprolol (400 mg/day) before the surgery, because celiprolol reduces vascular complications in patients with vEDS [14]. However, he was not administered celiprolol after the surgery. Immediately after surgery, systolic blood pressure was as low as 80–90 mmHg due to sepsis. However, the general condition improved; he started to get out of bed, and the systolic blood pressure often increased to 130 mmHg due to wound pain. Blood pressure monitoring was already discontinued in the general ward, and blood pressure may have risen further. Although there were no reports showing perioperative blood pressure control goals, rapid changes in blood pressure under general anesthesia have been reported to promote bleeding [15]. In addition, cases of arterial rupture due to a temporary increase in blood pressure during labor have also been reported [3]. Since intestinal perforation is an emergency operation, epidural anesthesia is often not indwelled. Good pain control and continued blood pressure monitoring will be important when starting to get out of bed. Furthermore, it is unclear whether 6-day cessation of the drug can trigger vascular complications, so immediate resurgence after surgery may be ideal.

Constipation treatment is important for patients with vEDS. Although the direct cause of intestinal perforation in this case is ischemic colitis, chronic constipation can increase intestinal pressure and induce the ischemic colitis. In fact, the patient had been complaining of constipation for some time, but had not been given regular laxatives to relieve the intestinal pressure. Approximately half of patients with vEDS have chronic constipation, which causes intestinal rupture [16, 17]. However, it is unclear whether constipation is the main trigger of colonic perforation, because the majority of first perforations occur before genetic diagnosis [13].

We should never rule out vEDS when there is no family history of vEDS or the characteristic physical (thin, transparent skin that bleeds easily and acrogeria) and facial (thin lips, small jaw, sharp nose, and bulging eyes) features. Although our patient had no family history and no characteristic features, he was diagnosed with vEDS, because he experienced serious vascular complications at a young age. We previously reported 28-year-old [18] and 52-year-old [19] patients with vEDS who had no family history. Only 38% of patients with vEDS have a family history [3]. Skin hyperextension and joint hypermobility are milder in vEDS than in the other EDS types, and many cases of vEDS are not diagnosed until serious symptoms appear [2, 3, 20]. The patient in our case underwent surgery for acute brachiocephalic dissection and hemothorax at a young age, and his mother had died suddenly due to acute aortic dissection. Hence, we strongly suspected him to have vEDS.

At the time of surgery, close attention to the patient is needed as patients with vEDS tend to bleed during surgery [16, 21, 22]. Anastomosis at emergency surgery is a great risk for patients with vEDS [18, 19, 23, 24]. It is also controversial whether colostomy closure should be performed. Many young patients with vEDS want closure of colostomy [18]; however, stoma closures have a great risk of anastomotic leakage. Approximately half of patients who experienced colonic perforation develop re-perforation [13]. However, patients with stoma often experienced re-perforation too. Thus, elective subtotal colectomy after a Hartmann procedure has been advocated by several authors [13].


In conclusion, vascular rupture, one of the remote vascular catastrophe, can occur immediately after surgery for intestinal rupture. We should pay special attention to patients in their forties as vascular complication is the most common cause of death. We should pay more attention to chronic constipation, which is reported in approximately half of the patients with vEDS, because it may be a cause of intestinal rupture.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Computed tomography


Ehlers–Danlos syndrome


Vascular type of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome


  1. 1.

    Japan Intractable Diseases Information Center Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Accessed 30 Dec 2020.

  2. 2.

    Germain DP. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pepin M, Schwarze U, Superti-Furga A, Byers PH. Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:673–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Eagleton MJ. Arterial complications of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J VascSurg. 2016;64:1869–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Abayazeed A, Hayman E, Moghadamfalahi M, Cain D. Vascular type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome with fatal spontaneous rupture of a right common iliac artery dissection: case report and review of literature. J Radiol Case Rep. 2014;8:63–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Malfait F, Francomano C, Byers P, Belmont J, Berglund B, Black J, et al. The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017;175:8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Watanabe A, Kosho T, Wada T, Sakai N, Fujimoto M, Fukushima Y, et al. Genetic aspects of the vascular type of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (vEDS, EDSIV) in Japan. Circ J. 2007;71:261–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Desal HA, Toulgoat F, Raoul S, Guillon B, Bommard S, Naudou-Giron E, et al. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV and recurrent carotid-cavernous fistula: review of the literature, endovascular approach, technique and difficulties. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:300–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Usinskiene J, Mazighi M, Bisdorff A, Houdart E. Fatal peritoneal bleeding following embolization of a carotid-cavernous fistula in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV. CardiovascInterventRadiol. 2006;29:1104–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Van Overmeire O, De Keukeleire K, Van Langenhove P, Defreyne L. Carotid-cavernous fistula in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome by pure transvenous approach. IntervNeuroradiol. 2006;12:45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Horowitz MB, Purdy PD, Valentine RJ, Morrill K. Remote vascular catastrophes after neurovascular interventional therapy for type 4 Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:974–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Barabas AP. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:366–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Adham S, Zinzindohoue F, Jeunemaitre X, Frank M. Natural history and surgical management of colonic perforations in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a retrospective review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62:859–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Frank M, Adham S, Seigle S, Legrand A, Mirault T, Henneton P, et al. Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: long-term observational study. J Am CollCardiol. 2019;73:1948–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dolan P, Sisko F, Riley E. Anesthetic considerations for Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Anesthesiology. 1980;52:266–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sentongo TA, Lichtenstein G, Nathanson K, Kaplan P, Maller E. Intestinal perforation in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome after enema treatment for constipation. J PediatrGastroenterolNutr. 1998;27:599–602.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Demirogullari B, Karabulut R, Demirtola A, Karabulut B, Gol H, Aybay C, et al. A novel mutation in the vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a case presenting with colonic perforations. J PediatrSurg. 2006;41:e27-30.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kanaka S, Yamada T, Matsuda A, Takahashi G, Hara K, Yoshida H. Surgical management of colonic perforation in a patient with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome with no family history: a case report. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2020;4:201–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sakai K, Toda M, Kyoyama H, Nishimura H, Kojima A, Kuwabara Y, et al. Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome with a novel missense mutation in COL3A1: a man in his 50s with aortic dissection after interventional treatment for hemothorax as the first manifestation. Intern Med. 2019;23:3441–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Beighton P, De Paepe A, Steinmann B, Tsipouras P, Wenstrup RJ. Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: revised nosology, Villefranche, 1997. Ehlers-Danlos National Foundation (USA) and Ehlers-Danlos Support Group (UK). Am J Med Genet. 1997;1998(77):31–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Soucy P, Eidus L, Keeley F. Perforation of the colon in a 15-year-old girl with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV. J PediatrSurg. 1990;25:1180–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sceats LA, Sukerkar PA, Raghaven SS, Shandiz AE, Shelton A, Kin C. Fragility of life: recurrent intestinal perforation due to vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64:2120–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Goto T, Onishi K, Sato T, Nihei Y, Igarashi Y, Katagiri S. Two episodes of colon perforation within a short period in a patient with vascular type of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. J JpnSurg Assoc. 2012;73:1987–92 (Japanese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Burcharth J, Rosenberg J. Gastrointestinal surgery and related complications in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a systematic review. Dig Surg. 2012;29:349–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Editage ( for English language editing.



Author information




DK and TY wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and YK, KM, TS, and HY reviewed and edited the manuscript. TY and DK jointly performed the surgical procedure. KM managed the patient’s perioperative course. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Kakinuma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kakinuma, D., Yamada, T., Kanazawa, Y. et al. A case of vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome with a ruptured hepatic artery after surgical treatment of peritonitis caused by the perforation of the colon. surg case rep 7, 74 (2021).

Download citation


  • Vascular type of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome
  • Sigmoid colon perforation
  • Hepatic artery rupture
  • Pan-peritonitis
  • Remote vascular catastrophe