Skip to main content

Long-term survival of two patients with pancreatic cancer after resection of liver and lung oligometastases: a case report

Abstract

Background

The efficacy of resection of pancreatic cancer metastases has not been established. We here report two patients with long-term survival after resection of lung and liver metastases.

Case presentation

The first patient underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. One year later, she underwent partial hepatectomy for a single liver metastasis. She subsequently underwent pulmonary resections 7, 7.5, 9, and 10 years later for pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer. Thus, this patient underwent five surgeries for metastases, one for a liver metastasis and four for lung metastases. All of the tumors were pathologically diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer. She is currently alive without new recurrence 10 years after the initial diagnosis. The second patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Four years later, she underwent a thoracoscopic partial resection for lung metastasis. The tumor was similar to the pancreatic cancer on pathological examination. She is currently alive without new recurrences 6 years after the initial diagnosis.

Conclusion

Long-term survival can be achieved in some patients with pancreatic cancer by resection of metachronous liver or lung metastases.

Background

The term oligometastasis was introduced in 1995 and refers to a state of limited systemic metastases [1]. There is no precise definition of this term; however, most studies define oligometastases as the presence of up to three, or up to five, metastases [2]. Theoretically, local ablative therapy may be curative in some patients with oligometastasis [3].

Long-term survival after excision of metastases has been reported for some types of cancer. Resection of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer can improve prognosis [4]. Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer has reportedly achieved good long-term cancer-specific survival benefit [5], repeat hepatic resection for colorectal cancer being as effective as primary surgical treatment [6].

However, pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers, being characterized by rapid progression, high metastatic potential, and limited response to conventional therapies [7]. Despite progress in the development of multidisciplinary treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with pancreatic cancer is less than 10% [8]. The efficacy of resection of metastatic pancreatic cancer has not been established; however, there is increasing interest in the possibility that metastasectomy in well-selected patients can prolong survival [9].

We here report two patients with pancreatic cancer with long-term survival after resection of liver and lung metastases.

Case presentation

Case 1: A 57-year-old woman was admitted with cancer of the pancreatic body. Computed tomography (CT) showed a 3.0 cm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic body and no evidence of intrahepatic, distant, or lymph node metastasis (Fig. 1a). This clinical course is summarized in Fig. 2a.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a CT image showing a 3.0 cm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic body. b Photomicrograph showing cancer cells with abundant fibrosis are arranged as tubular structures (hematoxylin and eosin [HE] staining). Original magnification: ×200. c CT image showing a mass suggestive of metastasis in the liver (S5). d Photomicrograph showing cancer cells with abundant fibrosis that are similar to those of the original pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. e CT image showing a nodule in the right lung (S2). F. Photomicrograph showing the tumor is similar to the original pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. g CT image showing a nodule in the left lung (S9). h Photomicrograph showing the tumor is similar to the original pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. i. CT image showing a nodule in the right lung (S6). j Photomicrograph showing a tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. k CT image showing a nodule in the left lung (S6). l Photomicrograph showing a tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Summary of the course of the case 1. b Summary of the course of the case 2

She underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, and lymph node dissection. On microscopic examination of the operative specimen, cancer cells with abundant fibrosis were arranged in tubular structures (Fig. 1b). There was microscopic evidence of invasion of the nerve plexus; however, no vascular invasion was identified and the resection margin was negative. The histopathological diagnosis was moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma (pT3N0M0 Stage IIA: UICC).

One year after resection of the primary tumor, a mass suggestive of liver metastasis was identified (S5) (Fig. 1c). No distant metastases were detected. She underwent a partial hepatectomy for liver metastasis. On microscopic examination, the cancer had abundant fibrosis and was similar to the original pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1d). The tumor was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer.

She was followed up with no recurrence for the next 5 years. However, 7 years after the primary resection, CT showed a 1-cm nodule in the right lung (S2) (Fig. 1e) that was diagnosed as a lung metastasis from pancreatic cancer. The single tumor appeared to be resectable so thoracoscopic resection of the right upper lobe was performed. The tumor was similar to the original pancreatic cancer on microscopic examination and was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1f).

Seven years and 6 months after the primary resection, she underwent thoracoscopic partial resection of a nodule in the left lung (S9) (Fig. 1g). This tumor was also diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1g). Nine years after the primary resection, she underwent partial resection of the right lobe (Fig. 1i) for another tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1j). Ten years after the primary resection, she underwent thoracoscopic resection of the left lower lobe (Fig. 1k) for another tumor that was also diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1l). She has since been followed up with no evidence of recurrence and remains alive without new recurrence 10 years after the initial diagnosis. Thus, she underwent five surgeries, one for liver metastasis and four for lung metastases after the primary resection.

Changes in the tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) before and after surgical resections are summarized in Table 1. The concentrations of CA19-9 had increased slightly before hepatectomy for metastatic liver cancer; however, the concentrations of these tumor markers were within their normal ranges at the times of the remaining measurements.

Table 1 Summary of changes in tumor markers concentrations

Gemcitabine (GEM) had been administered intravenously for 6 months after the primary resection as adjuvant chemotherapy, this having been the standard regimen at that time. However, she had experienced severe adverse effects, namely nausea and general malaise. Although adjuvant chemotherapy using GEM for 6 months after resection of the liver metastasis had been planned, she only received this chemotherapy for 2 months because of its severe adverse effects. After every pulmonary resection, adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) for 6 months was proposed, but she consistently refused it.

Case 2: A 73-year-old woman was admitted with cancer of the pancreatic head. CT showed a 2.0 cm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic head and no evidence of intrahepatic, distant, or lymph node metastasis (Fig. 3a). This clinical course is summarized in Fig. 2a.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a CT image showing a 2.0 cm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic head. b Photomicrograph showing cancer cells with abundant fibrosis arranged in tubular structures (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. c CT image showing a nodule in the right lung (S6). d Photomicrograph showing a tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200

She underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and lymph node dissection. Microscopic examination of the operative specimen showed cancer cells with abundant fibrosis arranged in tubular structures (Fig. 3b). Cancer cells were invading the nerve plexus and lymph vessels; however, no vascular invasion was identified and the resection margin was negative. One lymph node metastasis was detected. The histopathological diagnosis was moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma (pT3N1M0 Stage IIB: UICC).

Four years after the primary resection, CT showed a nodule in the right lung (S6) (Fig. 3c). We performed a thoracoscopic partial resection of the right lobe. The tumor was found to be similar to the pancreatic cancer on microscopic examination and was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (Fig. 3d). She has been followed up with no recurrence and remains alive without new recurrence 6 years after the initial diagnosis.

Changes in the tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 before and after surgical resections are summarized in Table 1. The concentrations of CA19-9 had increased slightly before primary resection of the pancreas, and had fallen to within the normal range after resection. CA19-9 concentrations were slightly increased both before and after pulmonary resection.

She underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year after the primary resection. Chemotherapy with S-1 for a further 6 months was proposed after resection of her lung metastasis; however, she refused this.

Discussion

Pancreatic cancer, one of the most lethal cancers, is characterized by rapid progression and limited response to conventional therapies [7]. Despite progress in the development of multidisciplinary treatments, the 5-year OS rate of patients with pancreatic cancer is less than 10% [8]. Metastatic or recurrent cancer is difficult to manage; in particular, surgery alone appears to be non-curative in patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer [9]. The most effective treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgical resection; however, in patients with simultaneous metastases at the time of diagnosis, the disease is unresectable according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [10]. In addition, resection is rarely indicated for metastases from pancreatic cancer. Isabella et al. reported administering systemic chemotherapy to 535 patients with oligometastasis from pancreatic cancer, only 24 (4.5%) of whom underwent successful resection [11]. However, resection of metachronous oligometastasis in well-selected patients with pancreatic cancer is reportedly effective [12]. The prognosis of pancreatic cancer reportedly improves when metachronous liver and lung metastases are resected, median overall survival after the first treatment varying from 51 to 121 months for lung metastases and from 24 to 40 months for liver metastases [13]. Isabella et al. reported a median OS of patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing resection of oligometastases of 56 months (range 36–75) [14], whereas Wright et al. reported a median OS for such patients of 18.2 months (95% CI 11.8–35.5) [15]. Still, our patients who underwent surgical resection for metastases, who survived more than 120 months and 72 months after the initial diagnosis, are extremely rare.

The characteristics of patients with long-term survival after resection of oligometastasis have not been fully clarified. In a study in which patients underwent pulmonary resection for suspected metastasis after resection of a primary pancreatic cancer, those with late recurrence (later than 17 months after primary surgery) had better OS than those with earlier development of pulmonary nodules (32.2 vs. 14.75 months, p = 0.025). High serum concentrations of tumor markers (CA 19-9 and CEA) and number of pulmonary metastases reportedly have no significant impact on outcome [16]. Lu et al. reported that resection of solitary hepatic or pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer should be considered only when: (I) complete surgical resection (R0) can be achieved by pancreatectomy; (II) the pancreatic cancer has responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy; (III) the oligometastases are resectable; and (IV) the patient is in overall good general health with few comorbidities [17]. Both of our patients met conditions (I), (III) and (IV); however, neither of them received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The reasons for our failure to prescribe this treatment were as follows: (1) the concept of neoadjuvant chemotherapy had not been clarified at the time in question; (2) there were few recommended chemotherapeutic regimens at that time; and (3) both patients refused chemotherapy because they had experienced severe adverse effects while receiving previous adjuvant chemotherapy.

Nowadays, the prognosis of unresectable pancreatic cancer has greatly improved with the advent of effective chemotherapeutic regimens such as FOLFIRINOX and GEM/nab-paclitaxel [18]. These treatments have been reported to have tumor-reducing effects [19, 20]. A recent study suggested that neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be important in determining surgical indications for oligometastasis, especially when it has occurred soon after resection of the primary lesion [11, 16, 17]. Thus, if a single liver metastasis occurs within 1 year of primary resection, neoadjuvant chemotherapy using effective chemotherapeutic regimens is currently considered for that metastasis. Additionally, more oligometastases may become resectable as a result of administering these treatments. Nevertheless, some patients who undergo surgical resection of oligometastasis experience long subsequent survivals without chemotherapy. Further investigation is necessary to determine the utility of neo and/or adjuvant chemotherapy for oligometastasis.

Systematic follow-up of patients who undergo surgical resection of oligometastasis is very important. Although one study has reported that up to 80% of patients who have undergone resection of oligometastases of pancreatic cancer develop recurrence within 2 years [12], there is no standard recommendation as to when follow-up can be stopped. The present cases indicate that late recurrence can occur and life-long follow-up may be necessary.

When treating metastases from pancreatic cancer, it is necessary to consider the site, number of metastases, general condition of the patient and the necessity of chemotherapy to determine whether resection is indicated.

Conclusions

We here present two patients with pancreatic cancer who achieved long-term survival by repeated resection of metastatic lesions. Resection of metachronous liver or lung metastases can result in long-term survival of some patients with pancreatic cancer.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Abbreviations

CA19-9:

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

CT:

Computed tomography

GEM:

Gemcitabine

HE:

Hematoxylin and eosin

OS:

Overall survival

UICC:

S-1: tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil; Union for International Cancer Control

References

  1. Hellman S, Weichselbaum R. Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:8–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Palma DA, Salama JK, Lo SS, Senan S, Treasure T, Govindan R, et al. The oligometastatic state - separating truth from wishful thinking. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:549–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Palma DA, Louie AV, Rodrigues GB. New strategies in stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(23):5198–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashworth AB, Senan S, Palma DA, Riquet M, Ahn YC, Ricardi U, et al. An individual patient data metaanalysis of outcomes and prognostic factors after treatment of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2014;15(5):346–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rees M, Tekkis PP, Welsh FK, O'Rourke T, John TG. Evaluation of long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multifactorial model of 929 patients. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):125–35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heise D, Bayings W, Tuinhorf A. Long-term outcome and quality of life after initial and repeat resection of colorectal liver metastasis: A retrospective analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;48:281–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1605–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ilic M, Ilic I. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:9694–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Piccoli A, Pedrazzoli S. Recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. World J Surg. 1997;21(2):195–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Asbun H, Bain A, Behrman SW, Benson AB, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(8):1028–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Isabella F, Paolo R, Alessandro G, Filippo S, Roberto G, Claudio B, et al. Downstaging in Stage IV pancreatic cancer: A new population eligible for surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(8):2397–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saedon M, Maroulis I, Brooks A, Alexiou E, Bouliaris K, Amanatidis T, et al. Metastasectomy of pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma to solid organ: the current evidence. J BUON. 2018;23(6):1648–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakaguchi T, Valente R, Tanaka K, Satoi S, Del Chiaro M. Surgical treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of current literature. Pancreatology. 2019;19(5):672–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Decoster C, Gilabert M, Autret A, Turrini O, Oziel-Taieb S, Poizat F, et al. Heterogeneity of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Lung metastasis show better prognosis than liver metastasis—a case control study. Oncotarget. 2016;7(29):45649–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wright GP, Poruk KE, Zenati MS, Steve J, Bahary N, Hogg ME, et al. Primary tumor resection following favorable response to systemic chemotherapy in Stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma with synchronous metastases: a bi-institutional analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(11):1830–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ilmer M, Schiergens TS, Renz BW, Schneider C, Sargut M, Waligora R, et al. Oligometastatic pulmonary metastasis in pancreatic cancer patients: Safety and outcome of resection. Surg Oncol. 2019;31:16–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu F, Poruk KE, Weiss MJ. Surgery for oligometastasis of pancreatic cancer. Chin J Cancer Res. 2015;27(4):358–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Tetsuhito M, Masaki K, Yoshito K, Kentaro S, Hiroshi N, Yasuyuki K, et al. Comparison of efficacy and eoxicity of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine with NAB-paclitaxel in unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017;8(3):566–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cristina RF, Giovanni M, Theodore SH, David PR, Vikram D, Erin IM, et al. Radiological and surgical smplications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. J Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer With NAB-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1691–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. Trish Reynolds, MBBS, FRACP, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanzgroup.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This case report did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KH is the first author of this manuscript and NH is the corresponding author. All the authors contributed to performing the surgeries, data collection, and data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norifumi Harimoto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The patients have provided permission to publish these features of his case, and their identities have been protected.

Consent for publication

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hagiwara, K., Harimoto, N., Araki, K. et al. Long-term survival of two patients with pancreatic cancer after resection of liver and lung oligometastases: a case report. surg case rep 6, 309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-01029-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-01029-y

Keywords