Skip to main content

Stent graft treatment for ruptured pseudoaneurysms of the splanchnic arteries after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case report

Abstract

Background

Hemorrhage due to a ruptured splanchnic pseudoaneurysm followed by the formation of a postoperative pancreatic fistula is the most severe complication of a pancreatectomy, sometimes leading to a fatal outcome. Stent graft placement to control the hemorrhage due to the pseudoaneurysm is a validated treatment option, but once the stent graft is infected, infection control is complicated. We report a case of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm of the splanchnic artery after pancreaticoduodenectomy to evaluate the stent graft treatment.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old man underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for suspected distal bile duct cancer. Hemorrhage from a pseudoaneurysm of the common hepatic artery due to the formation of the pancreatic fistula was detected on postoperative day 9, and a stent graft was successfully placed with the preservation of hepatic arterial blood flow. On postoperative day 12, new-onset hemorrhage from a pseudoaneurysm of the right hepatic artery developed, and a stent graft was similarly placed, but immediately occluded. Refractory pancreatic and biliary fistulas developed and required continuous drainage. On postoperative day 85, computed tomography revealed the presence of air within the latter stent graft, which indicated infection of the stent graft. The patient died due to sepsis caused by the graft infection.

Conclusion

Stent graft placement for the treatment of hemorrhage of a pseudoaneurysm secondary to a postoperative pancreatic fistula, following pancreaticoduodenectomy, is an effective treatment option as it achieves immediate hemostasis and maintains end-organ perfusion. However, stent graft infection is the most detrimental complication.

Background

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a standard surgical procedure for the treatment of pancreatic head and distal bile duct disease. The mortality rate due to a PD has decreased to less than 5%, but the morbidity rate remains high, ranging between 30 and 50% [1]. Hemorrhage and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) formation are the most severe complications following PD, sometimes leading to a fatal outcome. Delayed hemorrhage of ruptured splanchnic pseudoaneurysms caused by a POPF, which mainly occurs in the common hepatic artery (CHA) and the stump of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA), is a life-threatening condition with a high mortality rate and requires immediate intervention [2]. Surgical hemostasis and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) are the treatment options for the hemorrhage of pseudoaneurysms. Alternatively, treatment using stent graft placement has been sporadically reported and results in excellent clinical outcomes with the preservation of end-organ arterial blood flow [3]. Herein we report a case of ruptured splanchnic pseudoaneurysms secondary to a POPF following PD, which was treated with the placement of a stent graft to obtain primary hemostasis, but the stent graft was infected and lead to a fatal outcome.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old man, with a background of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, underwent pylorus-preserving PD for suspected distal bile duct cancer. He developed a pancreatic anastomotic leakage on postoperative day (POD) 6, which was draining from a drain placed at the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis during surgery. Sentinel bleeding from the drain was noted on POD 8, and an immediate contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan revealed no obvious bleeding points. However, a massive hemorrhage from the drain suddenly developed on POD 9, and emergency angiography detected a pseudoaneurysm at the CHA, which had caused the bleeding (Fig. 1a). The right hepatic artery (RHA) independently branched from the origin of the CHA. Based on the general condition of the patient and the likelihood of postoperative adhesions, the placement of a stent graft was the treatment of choice. A 6-F sheath was passed through the celiac trunk via the femoral artery. A 6 mm × 5 cm Viabahn stent (W.L. Gore, Flagstaff, Ariz) was placed from the CHA and the distal part of the replaced RHA to the left hepatic artery (LHA) with heparinization (Fig. 1b). Angiography following stent graft placement revealed the absence of a pseudoaneurysm and preserved hepatic arterial blood flow. His vital signs were stable after the intervention, and antiplatelet therapy was initiated using aspirin 100 mg/day. However, re-bleeding from the drain appeared on POD 12. Angiography was immediately performed, and contrast extravasation from an aneurysm at the RHA was detected (Fig. 1c). A 5 mm × 5 cm Viabahn stent was placed into the RHA with heparinization. Subsequent angiography showed the occlusion of the latter Viabahn stent, while the patency of the former Viabahn stent was maintained (Fig. 1d). Due to sufficient hepatic arterial blood flow through the RHA, by retrograde flow via the LHA, no additional intervention for the stent graft occlusion was performed, and the patient was carefully observed. A biliary fistula appeared on POD 15, which might be caused by the occlusion of RHA and compression of massive hematoma around the biliary anastomosis. An abdominal abscess around the biliary anastomosis was detected, and percutaneous CT-guided drainage was performed on POD 28, and antibiotic therapy based on a bacterial culture was initiated. These pancreatic and biliary fistulas were considered to be a refractory complication. On POD 85, the patient’s general condition worsened, and the CT scan revealed the presence of air within the latter occluded stent graft, which indicated that the stent graft had become infected (Fig. 2). Escherichia coli was confirmed by blood culture, and the patient died on POD 91 due to sepsis caused by the graft infection. This study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution, and informed consent was obtained from the patient’s next-of-kin.

Fig. 1
figure1

Pre- and postoperative angiogram. a Angiogram reveals contrast extravasation from the pseudoaneurysm at the CHA (arrow). The RHA is branched independently from the CHA (arrowhead). b A stent graft, 6 mm in diameter and 5 cm in length, is placed from the CHA and distal part of the replaced RHA to the LHA (arrows). c Angiogram shows contrast extravasation from the RHA (arrow). d A stent graft, 5 mm in diameter and 5 cm in length, was placed in the RHA, but occluded soon after (arrows)

Fig. 2
figure2

Enhanced CT on POD 85. CT reveals the presence of air within the occluded stent graft, which indicates stent graft infection (arrow)

Discussion

Pseudoaneurysms are believed to be caused by anatomical leakages, mainly due to pancreatic fistulas or injury of the arterial wall during operative dissection and lymphadenectomy [4]. It is crucial to detect and initiate interventions in cases of hemorrhaging due to pseudoaneurysms in order to improve outcomes. In this case, we presumed that the local infection secondary to the POPF had caused the pseudoaneurysms in the CHA and RHA to develop.

Despite the identification of the sentinel bleeding and having performed the CT scan in our case, the pseudoaneurysms were not clearly detected, and angiography was canceled. Sentinel bleeding is considered a sign of pseudoaneurysm bleeding prior to massive hemorrhage and is often observed in 45–78% of patients who have undergone PD [5]. Angiography has been recommended if this critical sign is identified [6].

Surgical re-exploration is the conventional management of hemorrhage due to a pseudoaneurysm. However, the surgery is difficult to perform due to tissue fragility and postoperative adhesions, which results in a significant risk of mortality and morbidity. The operative mortality rate has been reported as 43–50%. Therefore, surgical re-exploration is recommended when an endovascular approach is difficult [7]. Endovascular treatments, including TAE and stent graft placement, have been accepted as alternative treatment options for post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage. The advantages of endovascular treatments are the ability to perform these treatments percutaneously and immediately without the need for general anesthesia. TAE has been performed with high success and a lower mortality and morbidity rate when compared to open surgery [8]. However, liver abscess formation and liver dysfunction due to end-organ ischemia and re-bleeding may occur, resulting in an increasing rate of mortality [8].

To avoid these complications, stent graft placement is preferred over TAE. Stent graft placement provides excellent flexibility, enables precise deployment of the stent, and maintains end-organ arterial blood flow. Several reports on stent graft placement for the treatment of pseudoaneurysms after PD have recently been published [9, 10]. Asai et al. reviewed 34 cases of stent graft placement for visceral delayed arterial hemorrhage after pancreatic-head resection, and the hemorrhage site was found to be the hepatic artery in 27 patients, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in 5 patients, and the splenic artery (SA) in 2 patients [11]. The technical success rate was 100%. The complications following stent graft placement included the development of a liver abscess (2.9%), re-bleeding (11.8%), and stent occlusion (5.9%). It has been recommended that double antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) be administered after stent graft placement in the visceral artery, for the prevention of stent graft occlusion. However, when hemorrhaging occurs, it is difficult to initiate the DAPT, and single antiplatelet treatment might be preferred. The morbidity associated with stent graft placement has been considered the lowest when compared to that in TAE and re-laparotomy. However, stent graft infection is the most detrimental complication [8]. Four cases with the development of sepsis following stent graft placement for visceral hemorrhage after PD have been reported. Only 1 case of stent graft infection following placement for a pseudoaneurysm of the SMA has been reported [3]. In this case, air was present in the occluded stent graft due to abscess formation around the SMA with an unhealed POPF 4 months after stent graft placement. The patient died due to sepsis 5 months after that. Three cases have been reported in which 2 patients have died due to intra-abdominal sepsis, and 1 patient had died due to an unknown cause (Table 1) [12,13,14]. It is presumed that the occlusion of the stent graft might be a risk factor for the development of an infection as the thrombus within the stent graft might act as a medium for bacterial growth. Uncontrolled local infection with a POPF or a biliary fistula is another risk factor for stent graft infection. The risk of infection is considered similar in TAEs and stent grafts [12]. In our case, the placement of the stent graft was selected based on the general condition of the patient and the anatomical location of the pseudoaneurysm. Although percutaneous drainage of the POPF and the biliary fistula was performed in order to control local infection, the contact of abscess formed by the refractory fistula development to the occluded stent graft could have caused stent graft infection. Limitations of this study include the retrospective study design and small sample size.

Table 1 Cases of stent graft infection or sepsis following stent graft placement for visceral hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Conclusions

Stent graft placement for the treatment of hemorrhage of a pseudoaneurysm secondary to a POPF after PD is an effective treatment option. It immediately achieves hemostasis and maintains end-organ perfusion better than that in TAE and surgical re-exploration. If local infection around the pseudoaneurysm is uncontrolled, and the stent graft is occluded, a lack of immediate infection control may lead to a fatal outcome.

Availability of data and materials

All datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

PD:

Pancreaticoduodenectomy

POPF:

Postoperative pancreatic fistula

TAE:

Transcatheter arterial embolization

CHA:

Common hepatic artery

GDA:

Gastroduodenal artery

RHA:

Right hepatic artery

LHA:

Left hepatic artery

POD:

Postoperative day

SMA:

Superior mesenteric artery

DAPT:

Double antiplatelet treatment

SA:

Splenic artery

CT:

Computed tomography

References

  1. 1.

    De Oliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:931–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    van Berge Henegouwen MI, Allema JH, van Gulik TM, van Gulik TM, Verbeek PC, Obertop H, et al. Delayed massive haemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery. Br J Surg. 1995;82:1527–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Suzuki K, Mori Y, Komada T, Matsushima M, Ota T, Naganawa S. Stent-graft treatment for bleeding superior mesenteric artery pseudoaneurysm after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:762–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rumstadt B, Schwab M, Korth P, Samman M, Trede M. Hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1998;227:236–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lee HG, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW. Management of bleeding from pseudoaneurysms following pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:1239–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tien YW, Wu YM, Liu KL, Ho CM, Lee PH. Angiography is indicated for every sentinel bleed after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1855–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Limongelli P, Khorsandi SE, Pai M, Jackson JE, Tait P, Tierris J, et al. Management of delayed postoperative hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1001–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ding X, Zhu J, Zhu M, Li C, Jian W, Jiang J, et al. Therapeutic management of hemorrhage from visceral artery pseudoaneurysms after pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:1417–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fujioka S, Suzuki F, Funamizu N, Okamoto T, Munakata K, Ashida H, et al. Stent graft placement and balloon dilation for pseudoaneurysm complicated by distal arterial stenosis of the hepatic artery after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Case Rep. 2015;1:60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    You Y, Choi SH, Choi DW, Heo JS, Han IW, Han S, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after endovascular management of ruptured pseudoaneurysm in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019;96:237–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Asai K, Watanabe M, Kusachi S, Matsukiyo H, Saito T, Kodama H, et al. Successful treatment of a common hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm using a coronary covered stent following pancreatoduodenectomy: report of a case. Surg Today. 2014;44:160–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Stoupis C, Ludwig K, Inderbitzin D, Do DD, Triller J. Stent grafting of acute hepatic artery bleeding following pancreatic head resection. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:401–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Heiss P, Bachthaler M, Hamer OW, Piso P, Herold T, Schlitt HJ, et al. Delayed visceral arterial hemorrhage following Whipple’s procedure: minimally invasive treatment with covered stents. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:824–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang MQ, Liu FY, Duan F, Wang ZJ, Song P, Fan QS. Stent-grafts placement for treatment of massive hemorrhage from ruptured hepatic artery after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3716–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for providing the English language editing.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MN drafted the manuscript. KK, ME, SK, and FY participated in the design of this case presentation. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaru Nemoto.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

None

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This case report was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of their data.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nemoto, M., Koyama, K., Enokido, M. et al. Stent graft treatment for ruptured pseudoaneurysms of the splanchnic arteries after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case report. surg case rep 6, 122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00887-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Stent graft
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Pseudoaneurysm