- Case Report
- Open Access
Main right hepatic duct entering the cystic duct: a case report
Surgical Case Reportsvolume 5, Article number: 46 (2019)
Risk factors for bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy include severe inflammation at Calot’s triangle and aberrant bile duct variations. Knowledge of the various biliary anomalies and early identification may therefore assist in decreasing the rate of bile duct injury.
A 65-year-old woman was admitted with right hypochondrial pain and high fever. A diagnosis of acute calculous cholecystitis was made by radiological imaging. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed that the confluence of the right and left hepatic duct was unclear. Intraoperatively, the procedure was converted from a laparoscopic cholecystectomy to laparotomy because of unclear anatomy of the cystic duct with severe inflammation at Calot’s triangle. Furthermore, intraoperative cholangiography from Hartmann’s pouch showed the main right hepatic duct entering the cystic duct. Subtotal cholecystectomy was performed to avoid injuring the right hepatic duct.
Although an aberrant hepatic duct entering the cystic duct is not uncommon, the main right hepatic duct infiltrating the cystic duct is extremely rare. Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of the biliary duct and awareness of aberrant biliary duct variations is important in preventing bile duct injury.
Bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can cause bile leakage and stenosis. Risk factors for bile duct injury in LC include severe inflammation at Calot’s triangle and aberrant bile duct variations . Knowledge of the various biliary anomalies and early identification may therefore assist in decreasing the rate of bile duct injury. We report an extremely rare case of the main right hepatic duct entering the cystic duct and discuss the importance of the preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of the biliary duct.
A 65-year-old woman was admitted with right hypochondrial pain and high fever. On physical examination, her vital signs were as follows: temperature, 38.0 °C; blood pressure, 140/82 mmHg; heart rate, 80 beats per minute and regular; respiratory rate, 14/min; and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, 98% at room air, respectively. Her consciousness was lucid and Murphy’s sign was positive. Laboratory evaluation showed an increase in inflammatory response with a white blood cell count of 23,200/mm and C-reactive protein level of 30.5 mg/dL without liver, renal, and hematological dysfunction. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed acute calculous cholecystitis with thickened wall and gallbladder stone. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) showed that the confluence of the right and left hepatic duct was unclear (Fig. 1). Under preoperative diagnosis of acute calculous cholecystitis (grade II) , an emergency LC was planned. However, the procedure was converted to open cholecystectomy (OC) because of unclear anatomy of the cystic duct with severe inflammation at Calot’s triangle. Because identification of the cystic duct was difficult, the gallbladder was incised at the level of Hartmann’s pouch, and intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) from Hartmann’s pouch showed the main right hepatic duct entering the cystic duct (Fig. 2). After identifying the aberrant bile duct, subtotal cholecystectomy was performed to avoid injuring the aberrant hepatic duct. The gallbladder neck was closed by suture and ligation without approaching the cystic duct. A postoperative complication of bile leakage from the resection stump of the gallbladder was treated by endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (Fig. 3). The patient was discharged on postoperative day 25.
The incidence of bile duct injury, one of the most severe complications of LC, has been reported to be about 0.5% . Risk factors for bile duct injury in LC include severe inflammation at Calot’s triangle and aberrant bile duct variations . Previous reports revealed that the frequency of bile duct injury in cases with aberrant bile duct was higher than in cases without it . Although the occurrence of an aberrant hepatic duct entering the cystic duct is not uncommon [5, 6], the main hepatic duct infiltrating the cystic duct is extremely rare. In the past literature, we found only ten reports of the main hepatic duct entering the cystic duct, including the present case [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] (Table 1). In this type of the aberrant bile duct, the ligation of the cystic duct in proximity to the junction of the right hepatic duct may cause severe complications. A previous report showed that ligation of the main hepatic duct may lead to functional loss of a large segment of liver, jaundice, and cholangitis . Therefore, if this anomaly has been identified, we must attempt to prevent injury to the main hepatic duct by resecting the distal cystic duct of the junction at the hepatic duct.
Previously, MRCP in this anomaly showed the absence of union of the right and left hepatic duct [10, 11]. Similar to previous reports, MRCP in our case also showed that the confluence of the right and left hepatic duct was unclear. However, it is difficult to precisely diagnose this aberrant bile duct solely by the lack of clarity at this junction. Therefore, keeping this rare anomaly in mind, we might consider utilizing another imaging modality, such as drip infusion cholecystocholangiography–computed tomography (DIC-CT) and IOC. Kurata et al.  reported that it was possible to identify an aberrant right posterior sectoral hepatic duct (PHD) by using DIC-CT when the presence of aberrant PHD was suspected but could not be confirmed by MRCP or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Furthermore, Hirao et al.  reported that DIC-CT clearly identified both aberrant bile ducts and cystic ducts in comparison with MRCP. Therefore, it may be useful to perform DIC-CT when the presence of an aberrant bile duct is suspected by MRCP.
Tokyo Guidelines 2018 [2, 16] recommends early LC performed by experienced surgeons for grade II acute cholecystitis if patients meet the criteria of Charlson comorbidity index ≤ 5  and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≤ 2 . Although the present case met these criteria of early LC, the procedure was converted from LC to OC because of the unclear anatomy of the cystic duct with severe inflammation at Calot’s triangle. Furthermore, because IOC from Hartmann’s pouch revealed this aberrant right hepatic duct, subtotal cholecystectomy was performed to avoid injuring it. Similar to our case, most previous cases have involved adequate diagnosis of the aberrant right hepatic duct by IOC. Although it remains controversial whether IOC can prevent iatrogenic bile duct injury during LC [3, 19], Törnqvist et al.  reported that IOC was associated with a reduced risk of bile duct injury especially in patients with concurrent, or a history of, acute cholecystitis. Therefore, IOC might be useful for the avoidance of bile duct injury when this type of anomaly is suspected by preoperative imaging in addition to the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.
We report an extremely rare case of the main right hepatic duct entering the cystic duct. Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of the biliary duct and awareness of the variations of aberrant biliary duct are important in preventing bile duct injury in LC.
Drip infusion cholecystocholangiography–computed tomography
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
Posterior sectoral hepatic duct
Martin RF, Rossi RL. Bile duct injuries. Spectrum, mechanisms of injury, and their prevention. Surg Clin North Am. 1994;74:781–803.
Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Wakabayashi G, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):41–54.
Sheffield KM, Riall TS, Han Y, Kuo YF, Townsend CM Jr, Goodwin JS. Association between cholecystectomy with vs without intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common duct injury. JAMA. 2013;28:812–20.
Suhocki PV, Meyers WC. Injury to aberrant bile ducts during cholecystectomy: a common cause of diagnostic error and treatment delay. AJR. 1999;172:955–9.
Puente SG, Bannura GC. Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg. 1983;7:271–6.
Champetier J, Létoublon C, Alnaasan I, Charvin B. The cystohepatic ducts: surgical implications. Surg Radiol Anat. 1991;13:203–11.
Prinz RA, Howell HS, Pickleman JR. Surgical significance of extrahepatic biliary tree anomalies. Am J Surg. 1976;131:755–7.
Nomura T, Shirai Y, Sasagawa M, Wakai T, Hatakeyama K. Anomalous insertion of the right hepatic duct into the cystic duct: report of a case diagnosed before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 1999;9:211–2.
Hashimoto M, Hashimoto M, Ishikawa T, Iizuka T, Matsuda M, Watanabe G. Right hepatic duct emptying into the cystic duct: report of a case. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:359.
Yamamoto S, Sakuma A, Rokkaku K, Nemoto T, Kubota K. Anomalous connection of the right hepatic duct into the cystic duct: utility of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:643–4.
Kayahara M, Oyama K, Kitagawa H, Ohta T, Miwa K. Right hepatic duct opening into the cystic duct: the role of pre- and intraoperative cholangiography. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:719–21.
Matsumoto N, Hasegawa H, Shiroko T, Sakamoto E, Komatsu S, Kurumiya Y. A case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis associated with the left-sided gallbladder and an aberrant hepatic duct. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2008;41:1704–9.
Nishio H, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Uesaka K, Kanai M, Sano T, et al. Right hepatic lobectomy for bile duct injury associated with major vascular occlusion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 1999;6(4):427–30.
Kurata M, Honda G, Okuda Y, Kobayashi S, Sakamoto K, et al. Preoperative detection and handling of aberrant right posterior sectoral hepatic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:558–62.
Hirao K, Miyazaki A, Fujimoto T, Isomoto I, Hayashi K. Evaluation of aberrant bile ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: helical CT cholangiography versus MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:713–20.
Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):55–72.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.
ASA Physical Status Classification System. Last approved by the ASA House of Delegates on October 15, 2014. https://www.asahq.org/resources/clinical-information/asa-physical-status-classification-system
Törnqvist B, Strömberg C, Persson G, Nilsson M. Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e6457.
Törnqvist B, Strömberg C, Akre O, Enochsson L, Nilsson M. Selective intraoperative cholangiography and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102:952–8.
We thank Hugh McGonigle, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac), for editing a draft of the manuscript.
The authors declare no financial or any other type of support.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This retrospective study did not involve human participants, and therefore, ethical approval and consent for participation were not needed.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.