Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case Report
  • Open Access

Stool filling of an intestinal duplication cyst at the ileocecal valve triggers colonic intussusception: a case report

Surgical Case Reports20184:116

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-018-0527-z

  • Received: 12 July 2018
  • Accepted: 10 September 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Intestinal duplication, a congenital malformation, is considered a rare condition, particularly in adults. Although it affects young children, a minority of patients remains asymptomatic until adulthood. Here, we describe a case of an intestinal duplication cyst that caused intussusception by a unique mechanism.

Case presentation

A 19-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for intermittent abdominal pain. Computed tomography revealed colonic intussusception induced by a nodular mass in the ileocecal region. Urgent ileocecal resection was performed because of the risk of colonic ischemia. The resected material comprised a stool-filled noncommunicating cyst that protruded into the enteric lumen at the ileocecal valve. Histological analyses revealed that the inner wall of the cyst was lined with colonic mucosa and that the muscle layer of the cyst was shared with that of the original enteric wall; furthermore, the cyst had a vestige of an opening site in the wall. We concluded that the cyst was an intestinal duplication that poured stool into its lumen through the tiny orifice, thereby triggering intussusception.

Conclusions

The present case suggests that stool-pouring can cause intussusception into the space of an intestinal duplication lesion.

Keywords

  • Intestinal duplication
  • Duplication cyst
  • Ileocecal valve
  • Intussusception

Background

Alimentary tract duplication, a congenital malformation, occurs in approximately 1 out of 10,000 births. Ileac or ileocecal duplication is rather common in this condition. More than 80% of these cases are detectable as an acute abdomen or bowel obstruction before 2 years of age; however, a minority of patients remains asymptomatic until adulthood [13]. Intestinal duplication has recently attracted attention as a cause of intussusception in young adults [4, 5]. Our present case further elucidates this condition.

Case presentation

A 19-year-old male was referred to our hospital by a primary care physician for a history of intermittent cramping pain in the right flank persisting for several days. His abdomen was flat and soft; however, he complained of abdominal pain upon pressure in the right lower quadrant. Most laboratory test results revealed normal limits except for elevated white blood count (11,170/μL) and serum C-reactive protein level (1.6 mg/dL). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (Fig. 1) revealed intussusception at the ileocecal region, which appeared as a “target” sign with a tumorous oval mass of 56 × 41 mm as a leading point of intussusception. An urgent operation was performed because of the risk of colonic ischemia due to intussusception. At laparotomy, the bowels had already spontaneously reduced, and a mass was palpable in the ileocecal region. We performed an ileocecal resection, aiming to avoid the potential of relapse of intussusception due to the residual mass. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on day 16 postoperatively. The resected specimen (Fig. 2) comprised an oval cystic lesion of 45 × 35 × 22 mm that protruded into the enteric lumen at the ileocecal valve. The cyst was filled with brown-colored stiff material and did not communicate with the original enteric lumen upon macroscopy. Histological analysis (Fig. 3) revealed that the inner surface of the cyst was completely lined with colonic mucosa and was situated within the intestinal wall of the ileocecal valve. The original muscle layer of the intestine was separated into two layers at the cyst portion and was shared with the muscle layer of the cyst. Thus, we concluded that the cyst was a type of intestinal duplication. Although histological analysis could not identify any opening in the cyst wall, a discontinuity of the muscle layer was observed at the top of the cyst near the transitional point of ileocecal mucosa and the mucosa lined through the hole formed by the lack of muscle layer (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Abdominal computed tomography. a A characteristic “target” sign (white arrow) seen in the right abdomen. b Tumorous mass (white arrow) acting as a leading point for intussusception

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Resected material. a An oval duplication cyst of 45 × 35 × 22 mm protruding into the enteric lumen just at the ileocecal valve. b The cut surface of the cystic lesion. c The cyst was filled with brown-colored stiff stool

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Histopathological findings. a The inner wall of the cyst was lined with colonic mucosa, and it shared a muscle layer (arrows) with the original enteric wall. b The muscular layer (arrows) was separated into two layers at the edges of the cyst. c A vestige of the opening site in the cyst wall: a discontinuity (white arrows) of the cyst’s muscle layer (black arrows) was observed at the top of the cyst near the transitional point (arrowhead) between the ileum and colonic mucosa

Discussion

Intestinal duplication was first described by Fitz in 1884 [6]; in 1937, Ladd provided a detailed description of the clinical and pathological aspects of duplication of the alimentary tract as a congenital malformation [7]. He defined the three characteristic features of duplication: (1) well-formed smooth muscle layers, (2) an epithelial lining comprising some portion of the alimentary tract, and (3) contiguity with a portion of the alimentary tract. Furthermore, the duplication lesion shares a portion of its wall with that of the adjacent alimentary tract, usually sharing a common blood supply [8]. Duplication of the alimentary tract has been divided into the tubular (14%) and cystic (86%) types. The tubular type often has one or more direct communications with the adjacent bowel, whereas the cystic type usually does not communicate with the lumen of the adjacent bowel and contains a sticky mucoid fluid that is either chocolate or cafe au lait colored or almost colorless [7, 9, 10]. Lately, some communicating duplication cysts have been reported in adults [4, 8, 11, 12].

In 2016, Kyo et al. reported a similar cystic lesion filled with stool in an adult colon; however, that cyst was clearly communicating with the original bowel through a tubular twig [4]. They suggested that the cystic feature of duplication was a result of the accumulation of stool in the tubular duplication over the years. In the present case, the duplication cyst was not communicating with the enteric lumen. The cyst content was oval, with a consistency similar to that of stool, and was brown, suggesting that the presence of the stercobilin, which is a metabolic byproduct of bile produced via reduction of bilirubin by bacterial flora in the intestine, is responsible for the brown color of human fecal matter [13]. These findings indicate that the cyst communicated with the alimentary tract before being closed via an unknown mechanism. Our histological study revealed a focal discontinuity of the muscle layer in the cystic wall and a lining of mucosa through a defect in the muscle. Because these features of mucosa, also known as mucosal bridges, were sometimes seen after healing of an ulcer [14, 15] and because there was evidence of previous communication with the original bowel, our histological findings indicated a vestige of the opening site of cystic duplication. Similar to the case reported by Tamvakopoulos et al. [16], it is likely that our case had a directly communicated hole between the cyst and bowel lumen. The hole closed during the healing process, resulting in a discontinuity in the muscular layer and the formation of a mucosal bridge after the stool poured into the cyst through an orifice and subsequently triggered intussusception in adulthood. In adults, intussusception is considered a rare condition and is observed in less than 5% of all cases [17]. More than 80% of these cases are caused by organic lesions, such as inflammatory bowel disease, postoperative adhesions, and benign and malignant tumors. Additionally, malignancy accounts for a maximum of 30% and 66% of intussusception cases occurring in the small and large bowel, respectively [18]. The combination of both intussusception and duplication is rare, especially in adults [4, 5, 11, 12, 19]. These cases have mostly non-specific clinical profile and are difficult to diagnose preoperatively. Because of the large proportion of organic lesions and the significant risk of malignancy, surgical intervention is often required in adult intussusceptions [20]. Regarding the surgical procedure, the possibility of concomitant malignancy should be considered carefully in any case, although prompt intervention is frequently required depending on the clinical symptoms. We decided to perform an emergency surgery considering the possibility of the relapse of intussusception due to mass and the bowel ischemia, which may have led to bowel perforation and peritonitis. Only a few cases have reported on malignant tumors derived from bowel duplication cysts [2124]; moreover, cases in young adults are extremely rare [25]. The patient’s age and radiological examination findings were not indicative of coexisting malignancy. On conducting laparotomy, regional lymphadenopathy in the mesenterium, adhesion to the peritoneum, or peritoneal seeding was not observed, and ileocecal resection was performed. The patient’s clinical course was uneventful; therefore, the patient was discharged and has been free from abdominal symptoms for more than 5 years since surgery.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this case of an intestinal duplication cyst in an adult suggests that intussusception could be caused by stool pouring into the space of an intestinal duplication lesion that was not an obstacle in childhood. Although such conditions are extremely rare in adults, they have to be considered for a differential diagnosis of acute abdomen.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SK and HI performed the operation. SK, HI, NG, and TG participated in the treatment. TO performed pathological analysis. The manuscript was prepared by SK under the supervision of HI, TG, and TO. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Consent has been obtained from the patient and the family to publish clinical data in this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Tsukuba Gakuen Hospital, 2573-1 Kamiyokoba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0854, Japan
(2)
Department of Pathology, Tsukuba Gakuen Hospital, 2573-1 Kamiyokoba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0854, Japan

References

  1. Holcomb GW 3rd, Gheissari A, O’Neill JA Jr, Shorter NA, Bishop HC. Surgical management of alimentary tract duplications. Ann Surg. 1989;209:167–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Iyer CP, Mahour GH. Duplications of the alimentary tract in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30:1267–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hackam DJ, Zalev A, Burnstein M, Rotstein OD, Koo J. Enteric duplication in the adult, derived from the foregut, midgut and hindgut: presentation, patterns and literature review. Can J Surg. 1997;40:129–33.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Kyo K, Azuma M, Okamoto K, Nishiyama M, Shimamura T, Maema A, et al. Laparoscopic resection of adult colon duplication causing intussusception. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:2398–402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim HS, Sung JY, Park WS, Kim YW. An ileal duplication cyst manifested as an ileocolic intussusception in an adult. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014;25(Suppl 1):196–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fitz RH. Persistent omphalo-mesenteric remains; their importance in the causation of intestinal duplication, cyst-formation, and obstruction. Am J Med Sci. 1884;88:30–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ladd WE. Duplications of the alimentary tract. South Med J. 1937;30:363–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fiorani C, Scaramuzzo R, Lazzaro A, Biancone L, Palmieri G, Gaspari AL, et al. Intestinal duplication in adulthood: a rare entity, difficult to diagnose. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;3:128–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Puligandla PS, Nguyen LT, St-Vil D, Flageole H, Bensoussan AL, Nguyen VH, et al. Gastrointestinal duplications. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:740–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Gross RE, Holcomb GW Jr, Farber S. Duplications of the alimentary tract. Pediatrics. 1952;9:448–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Li BL, Huang X, Zheng CJ, Zhou JL, Zhao YP. Ileal duplication mimicking intestinal intussusception: a congenital condition rarely reported in adult. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6500–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ho YC. Total colorectal and terminal ileal duplication presenting as intussusception and intestinal obstruction. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:6338–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Boron W, Boulpaep E. Medical physiology: a cellular and molecular approach. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 984–6.Google Scholar
  14. Waye JD. Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol. 1980;9:279–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kitagawa T, Masaoka R, Katayama Y, Tamano M. A case of gastric ulcer with mucosal bridge. Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179552217749206.Google Scholar
  16. Tamvakopoulos GS, Sams V, Preston P, Stebbings WS. Iron-deficiency anaemia caused by an enterolith-filled jejunal duplication cyst. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004;86:W49–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Azar T, Berger DL. Adult intussusception. Ann Surg. 1997;226:134–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu T, Chng YM. Adult intussusception. Perm J. 2015;19:79–81.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Reiser-Erkan C, Erkan M, Ulbrich E, Nahrig J, Kleeff J. Cystic colon duplication causing intussusception in a 25-year-old man: report of a case and review of the literature. BMC Surg. 2010;10:19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Marinis A, Yiallourou A, Samanides L, Dafnios N, Anastasopoulos G, Vassiliou I, et al. Intussusception of the bowel in adults: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:407–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Blank G, Konigsrainer A, Sipos B, Ladurner R. Adenocarcinoma arising in a cystic duplication of the small bowel: case report and review of literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee J, Jeon YH, Lee S. Papillary adenocarcinoma arising in a duplication of the cecum. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:601–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Tew K, Soans BK, Millar EA. Adenocarcinoma in an ileal duplication cyst: ultrasound and computed tomography findings. Australas Radiol. 2000;44:228–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Jung KH, Jang SM, Joo YW, Oh YH, Park YW, Paik HG, et al. Adenocarcinoma arising in a duplication of the cecum. Korean J Intern Med. 2012;27:103–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fletcher DJ, Goodfellow PB, Bardsley D. Metastatic adenocarcinoma arising from a small bowel duplication cyst. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002;28:93–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement