Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case Report
  • Open Access

Anal gland adenocarcinoma in situ with pagetoid spread: a case report

  • 1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 4 and
  • 1
Surgical Case Reports20184:63

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-018-0469-5

  • Received: 6 February 2018
  • Accepted: 12 June 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Anal gland carcinoma with perianal Paget’s disease is rare, and anal gland carcinoma in situ is extremely rare. No cases of anal gland carcinoma in situ with pagetoid spread have been previously reported.

Case presentation

Physical examination in a 75-year-old woman revealed an erythematous, inflamed, perianal skin lesion. Neither colposcopy, cystoscopy, colonoscopy, computed tomography, nor magnetic resonance imaging showed evidence of malignant genitourinary or gastrointestinal lesions. Histopathological examination of a biopsy specimen showed many Paget’s cells in the perianal skin lesion and no malignant cells in the rectal or vaginal mucosa. Therefore, primary extramammary Paget’s disease of the anogenital region was suspected, and we performed anus-preserving wide local excision. However, immunohistochemistry revealed a diagnosis of secondary extramammary Paget’s disease due to adenocarcinoma arising from the anal gland. We therefore proceeded with a radical operation. Histopathological examination showed no residual cancer cells. The final diagnosis was anal gland adenocarcinoma in situ with pagetoid spread in the perianal skin.

Conclusions

This is the first case report of anal gland adenocarcinoma in situ with pagetoid spread. We recommend immunohistochemical analysis of biopsy and locally resected specimens to obtain an accurate diagnosis and determine the appropriate treatment when there is no visible tumor.

Keywords

  • Anal gland adenocarcinoma
  • Adenocarcinoma in situ
  • Perianal Paget’s disease

Background

Perianal Paget’s disease (PPD) is rare. There are two types of PPD: primary and secondary. When an underlying adenocarcinoma is present, PPD usually represents intraepidermal extension of an invasive carcinoma from an adjacent internal organ and is generally regarded as secondary [1].

There are some reports of pagetoid spread of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix [2] and pagetoid changes in urothelial carcinoma in situ [3, 4]. However, there are no reports of anal gland adenocarcinoma in situ with pagetoid spread.

Herein, we report the first documented case of anal gland carcinoma in situ with pagetoid spread.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital complaining of itching around her anus. She had a history of sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis 6 years prior and a past history of Sjögren’s syndrome. She had noted a reddish skin lesion around her anus over the past several years. She reported no change in bowel habits, no gastrointestinal symptoms, no weight loss, and no family history of malignancy.

Physical examination revealed an erythematous, inflamed skin lesion in the perianal region (Fig. 1), but a normal vagina and rectum. Neither colposcopy, cystoscopy, nor colonoscopy showed evidence of a visible lesion or any abnormality of the cervix, bladder, or rectum (Fig. 2a, b). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed no evidence of malignancy in the genitourinary or gastrointestinal tracts. Histopathological examination of biopsy specimens showed many Paget’s cells within intraepithelial lesions of the perianal skin but no malignant cells in the rectal or vaginal mucosa. Therefore, primary extramammary Paget’s disease (EMPD) of the anogenital region was suspected. We performed anal-preserving wide local excision deep to the subcutaneous fat with 1-cm negative margin from the positive sites confirmed by frozen section examination and mucosal resection of the anal canal that was extended 1 cm proximal to the dentate line of the anal canal. Reconstruction was performed using a bilobed gluteal fold flap (Fig. 3a, b).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Macroscopic view of the perianal skin. A 60 × 75-mm pagetoid spreading lesion is visible around the anus

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Colonoscopy. There is no visible lesion in the rectum or anal canal. a Ordinary observation. b Reversal observation

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Surgical findings. a Anal-preserving wide local excision deep to the subcutaneous fat. b Reconstruction using a bilobed gluteal fold flap

Histopathological examination of the resected specimen showed Paget’s cells, characterized by clear cytoplasm and large pleomorphic nuclei, within the epidermis. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the Paget’s cells were positive for cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20, and caudal-related homeobox gene nuclear transcription factor (CDX) 2 and negative for gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP) 15 (Fig. 4a–e). These data suggested that her perianal skin lesion was secondary EMPD arising from the rectum, although there was no lesion found in the rectum. Additional histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed well-differentiated adenocarcinoma in an anal gland, continuous with the Paget’s cells in the anoderm, but limited in the basement membrane without a desmoplastic change (Figs. 5a, b and 6a–e). Immunohistochemical staining of the resected specimen revealed secondary EMPD due to adenocarcinoma arising from the anal gland.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Histological findings of perianal Paget’s disease. a Paget’s cells with clear cytoplasm and large pleomorphic nuclei (hematoxylin-eosin; magnification × 20). bd Positive immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin (CK) 7 (b), CK20 (c), and caudal-related homeobox gene nuclear transcription factor (CDX) 2 (d), and negative for gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP) 15 (e) (magnification × 20)

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Macroscopic images of locally resected specimen. Blue lines indicated pagetoid spread, and red lines indicated anal gland adenocarcinoma in situ. a Skin side. b Back side

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Histological findings of anal gland carcinoma. a In situ adenocarcinoma of the anal glands (arrow) (hematoxylin-eosin; magnification × 10). be Positive immunohistochemical staining for CK7 (b), CK20 (c), CDX2 (d), and p53 (e) (magnification × 20)

Because of the possibility of residual adenocarcinoma in the anal gland, possibly extending to the sphincter, we performed a radical laparoscopy-assisted abdominoperineal resection. Any reconstructive plastic surgery was not needed. Histopathological examination revealed no residual cancer cells in the resected specimen and no lymph node metastasis. The final diagnosis was anal gland adenocarcinoma in situ with pagetoid spread in the perianal skin.

Discussion

PPD was defined as intraepithelial adenocarcinoma of the perianal skin and is classified into two subgroups: primary and secondary [5]. Primary PPD originates from the epidermis or skin appendages, including the eccrine glands, apocrine glands, ectopic mammary-like glands, and epidermal pluripotent stem cells. Secondary PPD, also known as pagetoid phenomenon, is a metastatic tumor derived from underlying carcinoma cells [1]. Immunohistochemical staining for GCDFP15, CDX2, CK7, and CK20 are especially useful in differentiating the type and the origins of EMPD. GCDFP15 is considered as apocrine epithelium-specific tissue marker [1], and negative in secondary EMPD [6]. The expression of CDX2 is a sensitive and specific marker for the secondary type, arising from anorectal or colonic adenocarcinoma [7], but CDX2 fails to distinguish primary disease from EMPD secondary to urothelial or prostatic malignancy [8]. Many anal gland adenocarcinomas stained for CK7 but did not stain for CK20, similar to the normal anal gland [911]. However, several cases of secondary type arising from anal gland carcinoma showed CK7 positive and CK20 positive [1214].

Approximately 50% of patients with anal-margin Paget’s disease harbor a colorectal neoplasm mandating full colonoscopy for complete evaluation [15]. In our patient, there was no visible gastrointestinal, genital, or urinary tumor, and we initially suspected primary PPD. However, immunohistochemical analysis (CK7 +, CK20 +, GCDFP15 −, CDX2 +) suggested secondary EMPD. This discrepancy led us to perform additional histopathological studies on the resected specimen, which revealed the original site of the Paget’s disease as an in situ, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma in an anal gland.

Anal crypt glands, which lie at the level of the dentate line, can extend into the longitudinal layer after penetrating the internal sphincter [16, 17]. Thus, combined resection of the anal sphincter at the site of the malignancy is necessary for curative resection of secondary EMPD arising from an anal gland, even if the lesion is carcinoma in situ.

Conclusions

This case report indicates that the symptomatic pagetoid changes in the perianal skin without a visible tumor in the rectum should raise the suspicion of pagetoid spread from anal gland adenocarcinoma in situ. We recommend immunohistochemical analysis of biopsy specimen to elucidate the differential diagnosis of primary vs secondary Paget’s disease, and locally resected specimen to identify the origin of secondary EMPD and determine the appropriate treatment.

Abbreviations

CDX: 

Caudal-related homeobox gene nuclear transcription factor

CK: 

Cytokeratin

EMPD: 

Extramammary Paget’s disease

GCDFP: 

Gross cystic disease fluid protein

PPD: 

Perianal Paget’s disease

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

KI drafted this manuscript, and MS supervised the writing of the manuscript. MT and CO performed the immunohistochemical analysis. KI, TU, SO, MK, and FK performed the operation. KI, HK, TU, TI, SO, TN, YS, YN, MN, KN, and FK performed the perioperative management of the patient. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara Nara, 634-8522, Japan
(2)
Department of Endoscopy, Nara Medical University Hospital, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara Nara, 634-8522, Japan
(3)
Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara Nara, 634-8522, Japan
(4)
Department of Plastic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara Nara, 634-8522, Japan

References

  1. Liao X, Mao W, Lin A. Perianal Paget’s disease co-associated with anorectal adenocarcinoma: primary or secondary disease. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2014;8:186–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Mahdi H, Thrall M, Agoff N, et al. Pagetoid adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix with pagetoid spread into the vagina. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:461–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lopez-Beltran A, Luque RJ, Moreno A, et al. The pagetoid variant of bladder urothelial carcinoma in situ: a clinicopathological study of 11 cases. Virchows Arch. 2002;441:148–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnould L, Chalabreysse L, Belichard C, et al. Genital carcinoma secondary to pagetoid spread from a pagetoid urothelial carcinoma in-situ. Histopathology. 1998;32:575–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Isik O, et al. Perianal Paget’s disease: three decades experience of a single institution. Int J Color Dis. 2016;31:29–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Minicozzi A, Borzellino G, Momo R, et al. Perianal Paget’s disease: presentation of six cases and literature review. Int J Color Dis. 2010;25:1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. De Nisi MC, D’Amri A, Toscano M, et al. Usefulness of CDX2 in the diagnosis of extramammary Paget disease associated with malignancies of intestinal type. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153:677–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Perrotto J, Abbott JJ, Ceilley RI, et al. The role of immunohistochemistry in discriminating primary from secondary extramammary Paget disease. Am J Dermatopathol. 2010;32:137–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ramalingam P, Hart WR, Goldblum JR. Cytokeratin subset immunostaining in rectal adenocarcinoma and normal anal glands. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125:1074–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lisovsky M, Patel K, Cymes K, et al. Immunophenotypic characterization of anal gland carcinoma: loss of p63 and cytokeratin 5/6. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:1304–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zeiton MA, Knight BC, Khaled YN, et al. Carcinoma arising within an anal gland. BMJ Case Rep. 2011;2011.Google Scholar
  12. Ohnishi T, Watanabe S. The use of cytokeratins 7 and 20 in the diagnosis of primary and secondary extramammary Paget’s disease. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:243–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Meriden Z, Montgomery EA. Anal duct carcinoma: a report of 5 cases. Hum Pathol. 2012;43:216–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuroda N, Tanida N, Ohara M, et al. Anal canal adenocarcinoma with MUC5AC expression suggestive of anal gland origin. Med Mol Morphol. 2007;40:50–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Leonald D, Beddy D, Dozois EJ. Neoplasms of anal canal and perianal skin. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011;24:54–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. PARKS AG. Pathogenesis and treatment of fistula-in-ano. Br Med J. 1961;18:463–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chauhan NS, Sood D, Shukla A. Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) characterization of perianal fistulous disease in a rural based tertiary hospital of North India. Pol J Radiol. 2016;81:611–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement