Open Access

Integrally calcified solitary fibrous tumor in the retroperitoneum: a case report and review of the literature

  • Takehiro Maki1Email author,
  • Syotaro Fujino1,
  • Kenjiro Misu1,
  • Hiroyuki Kaneko1,
  • Hitoshi Inomata1,
  • Makoto Omi1,
  • Masatoshi Tateno2 and
  • Kazuyoshi Nihei1
Surgical Case Reports20162:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-016-0143-8

Received: 9 November 2015

Accepted: 11 February 2016

Published: 13 February 2016

Abstract

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare stromal neoplasm and usually occurs in the thoracic cavity. We here report a case of retroperitoneal SFT with prominent calcification. A 64-year-old man presented with an incidentally detected retroperitoneal mass in the right upper abdomen. Imaging tests indicated an integrally calcified mass. The lesion was observed for 2 years and laparoscopically resected according to the patient’s wish. Microscopically, the mass was mostly occupied by calcification and proliferous spindle cells were scattered with positive CD34 expression. We diagnosed morphologically benign SFT and the patient remained disease-free 1 year after the excision. There has been no report of such integrally calcified SFT. Retroperitoneal SFT is difficult to make a preoperative diagnosis, and careful follow-up after the excision is recommended because morphological malignancy does not always correspond to clinical malignancy.

Keywords

Solitary fibrous tumor Retroperitoneum Calcification

Background

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is known as an uncommon mesenchymal neoplasm. It mainly develops in thoracic cavity but extrathoracic SFTs have been also reported. We here present a rare case of retroperitoneal SFT with marked calcification, followed by a review of the literature.

Case presentation

A 64-year-old Japanese man without any symptoms had a medical checkup, and abdominal ultrasonography revealed a mass of the right upper abdomen with acoustic shadow. He had hypertension and underwent appendectomy for appendicitis by McBurney’s incision at 13 years old. He was 162 cm tall and weighted 70 kg (body mass index, 26.8). His blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation, and body temperature were 146/76 mmHg, 66 beats/min, 97 %, and 36.2 °C, respectively. His abdomen was flat and soft without any palpable masses. Laboratory examinations revealed no remarkable abnormalities of complete blood count, inflammation, liver function, renal function, electrolytes, or coagulation system. Plain computed tomography showed a mass with extremely high densities; it was 6.5 cm in the longest diameter and located next to the undersurface of the right hepatic lobe and the right kidney (Fig. 1a, b). Contrast enhanced computed tomography did not reveal any other lesions in the chest and abdomen. Magnetic resonance imaging showed low signal intensities on both T1- and T2-weighted images (Fig. 1d, e). We considered that the lesion mainly consisted of calcification and diagnosed large peritoneal pearl body or sponge-induced granuloma due to the past appendectomy. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, or extraskeletal osteosarcoma were considered as differential diagnoses although they were atypical or rare according to the imaging findings. We informed the patient about a low possibility of malignancy of the lesion and he wished observation. Two years after, the patient hoped surgical excision although the lesion showed a stable imaging in computed tomography (Fig. 1c).
Fig. 1

Preoperative images. a, b Images of plain computed tomography on the patient’s first visit. A mass with extremely high densities was located next to the undersurface of the right hepatic lobe and the right kidney (yellow arrows). It was 6.5 cm in the longest diameter. c An image of plain computed tomography 2 years after the patient’s first visit (yellow arrow). There were no remarkable changes of the mass in its appearance or size. d, e Magnetic resonance imaging on the patient’s first visit. The mass showed low signal intensities on both d T1- and e T2-weighted images (red arrows)

We performed laparoscopic resection of the mass. We broke up adhesions between the omentum and the right upper abdominal wall and found a white and hard mass in the retroperitoneum over the adhesions (Fig. 2a). It was excised from the retroperitoneum using ultrasonically activated scalpel. Operative duration was 115 min and intraoperative hemorrhage was little. On gross examination, the excised specimen entirely looked like calcification (Fig. 2b). Division surface of the specimen mainly presented calcification and partially red soft tissues (Fig. 2c). Microscopically, small quantities of densely proliferated spindle cells were scattered in major quantities of hyalinizing collagen fiber (Fig. 3a). The spindle cells showed low cytological atypia and no mitosis. Immunohistochemistry showed positive staining of CD34 and vimentin and negative staining of Bcl-2, SMA, A-100, or p53 (Fig. 3bg). Immunoreaction for Ki-67 was detected in fewer than 1 % of the neoplastic cells (Fig. 3h). The surgical margin was free from the tumor cells. We diagnosed morphologically and immunologically benign SFT in the retroperitoneum. The patient recovered without any postoperative complications, discharged 9 days after the surgery, and had no recurrence 1 year after the surgery.
Fig. 2

A laparoscopic image of the right upper abdomen and photographs of the excised specimen. a In the right upper retroperitoneum, a white and hard mass was observed next to the right hepatic lobe and the right kidney. b The excised specimen presented calcified mass. c Division surface of the specimen presented mainly calcification and partially red soft tissues

Fig. 3

Microscopic findings of the specimen. a An image of hematoxylin-eosin staining. Spindle cells with low cytological atypia densely proliferated in much hyalinizing collagen fiber. bh Images of immunoreactivity for CD34, Bcl-2, vimentin, SMA, S-100, p53, and Ki-67 are shown, respectively

SFT which is currently known as an uncommon soft tissue neoplasm was first reported as a kind of pleural neoplasms in 1931 [1] and was originally an exclusive diagnosis of pleural neoplasms [2]. Recent electron microscopic and immunohistochemical studies revealed that SFT derives from fibroblastic or myofibroblastic cells under the mesothelium [3, 4]. Thoracic SFT has an age-standardized incidence rate of 1.4 per million, typically occurs in the sixth and seventh decade, and affects both genders equally [5, 6]. Eighty percent of SFT occurs in the thoracic cavity while 20 % of that is found in extrathoracic regions including the retroperitoneum [7, 8]. Retroperitoneal SFT as in the present case is considered to be comparatively rare.

SFT can cause local pressure syndrome [9] and some reports described that SFT presented hypoglycemia due to the insulin-like growth factor II secretion from the tumor [10, 11]. In imaging studies, SFT typically presents well-defined and lobulated mass with well-enhancement [9]. Wignall et al. investigated characteristics of radiologic findings in 34 SFTs and revealed that 62 % of them had the lobulated contours, 9 % had the local invasions, 79 % had heterogenous enhancement patterns, and 65 % had strong contrast enhancement [12]. On magnetic resonance imaging, SFT typically exhibits hypo- or isointensity in T1-weighted image and heterogeneous hyperintensity in T2-weighted image [13], the differential diagnoses of SFT in the retroperitoneum include liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, lymphoma, schwannoma, neurofibroma, leiomyoma, myolipoma, angiomyolipoma, sympathetic paraganglioma, desmoid tumor, and epithelioid sarcoma [14]. In the present case, SFT was incidentally detected without any symptoms, imaging inspection provided extremely atypical findings as any retroperitoneal neoplasms including SFT, and thus a precise preoperative diagnosis was difficult. Non-neoplastic lesions such as peritoneal pearl body or foreign body granuloma due to retained surgical sponge in the past appendectomy were exclusively considered, but the imaging findings were not typical of them as well as of neoplastic disease [15]. Fine needle aspiration or biopsy might be difficult due to its marked calcification.

Microscopically, SFT shows multiplying spindle cells in the patternless appearance and the hemangiopericytoma-like appearance with prominent vascularity [16]. England et al. described high cellularity, high mitotic activity (more than 4 mitoses per 10 high-power field), pleomorphism, necrosis, and hemorrhagic changes as the criteria for morphological malignancy of SFT [17]. Those malignant features are observed in about 10 % of SFTs [18]. In immunohistochemistry, CD34 and Bcl-2 are especially useful for differentiating SFT from the other spindle cell neoplasia [9, 19]. Immunoreactivity for CD34 was observed in 98 % and that for Bcl-2 was confirmed in 90 % of SFTs [20]. Other immunological targets such as CD99, desmin, SMA, c-kit, S-100, EMA, CK, CD31, and inhibin are also used for specific diagnosis of SFT [21]. In the present case, the marked calcification was extremely unusual but the scattered tumor cells provided typical structures of SFT with positive immunostaining of CD34 and were considered to be morphologically benign.

The problem regarding malignancy of SFT is discrepancies of morphological malignancy and clinical malignancy [8, 22, 23]. The discrepancy may be partially due to malignant transformation with dedifferentiation of the tumor cells [24, 25]. Therefore, we should not trust morphological findings but immunohistochemistry for some relevant proteins may provide indications of SFT’s clinical malignancy. Takizawa et al. reported that patients with positive immunostaining of both CD34 and Bcl-2 had no recurrence [23]. Loss of immunoreactivity for CD34 and Bcl-2 was observed in the component with malignant transformation [24, 25]. Immunoreaction for p53 was not observed in benign SFT but much confirmed in morphologically and clinically malignant SFT [25]. The present case morphologically yielded typical benign features without immunoreactivity for p53 but can potentially cause a recurrence and should be carefully followed up.

Almost all patients with SFT underwent surgical excision. Many surgical doctors recommend complete surgical excision to obtain clear margins with careful long-term follow-up [8, 9, 16, 26]. There have been few reports concerning chemotherapy for SFT and thus its efficacy is not evident. Baldi et al. used anthracycline and ifosfamide for a patient with recurrent SFT and got partial response; cisplatin and gemcitabine, progressive disease [22]. We performed microscopically complete resection of the tumor and consider follow-up without adjuvant chemotherapy as reasonable.

SFT in the retroperitoneum is rare, and 31 cases have been reported including this case for the last 15 years [9, 14, 16, 18, 2024, 2642] (Table 1). The English language literature was extracted from PubMed from 2000 to 2015 using the following Medical Subject Heading terms: “solitary fibrous tumor” and “retroperitoneum”. Age of onset ranged from 17 to 83 and its median was 56. Male to female ratio of the patients was 16:15. Ten patients (38 %) complained of local pressure symptoms in 26 patients with description of any symptoms; 9 patients (35 %), palpable mass; 7 patients (27 %), asymptomatic. Location of the tumor varied all over the retroperitoneal cavity. Size of the tumor ranged from 3.1 to 36 cm and its median was 11.5 cm. No cases were preoperatively diagnosed as SFT. Surgical excision was performed in all cases. Morphologically, 16 cases (62 %) presented benign features while 10 cases (38 %) exhibited malignant findings. Positive immunostaining for CD34, Bcl-2, and p53 was observed at 28 (97 %), 14 (74 %), and 2 (22 %) in described 29, 19, and 9 cases, respectively. Clinical outcomes varied; 21 (78 %) patients remained disease-free after the surgery, 4 patients (15 %) had local recurrence or distant metastasis after the operation, and 3 patients of them died of the disease. One case was diagnosed morphologically benign but suffered distant metastasis 13 years after the surgery and died. The only case of negative immunostaining for CD34 died of the disease. One of the 2 cases in which p53 was immunohistologically positive was dead of the disease. These results indicate that retroperitoneal SFT is quite difficult to diagnose and can be clinically malignant although morphological examinations yield benign findings and negative immunostaining of CD34 or positive immunostaining of p53 can be signs of clinical malignancy.
Table 1

Reported 31 cases of solitary fibrous tumor in the retroperitoneum

Reference

Age

Sex

Major complaint

Adjacent structure

Size (cm)

Morphological malignancy

Immunohistochemistry

Outcome

CD34

Bcl-2

p53

2008, Takizawa [23]

ND

M

Dysuria

ND

9

Benign

+

+

Disease-free

 

ND

M

Asymptomatic

Kidney

ND

Benign

+

+

Disease-free

2005, Cristi [21]

28

F

Pain

Sacrum

7.5

Benign

+

+

ND

ND

2009, Lau [36]

58

F

Asymptomatic

ND

15

Benign

+

+

ND

7.3 years, disease-free

2011, Charhi [39]

75

M

Palpable mass

Pancreas tail and left adrenal grand

ND

Benign

+

+

ND

ND

2012, Azadi [41]

57

M

Asymptomatic

Pancreas

3.1 and 4.3

Benign

+

+

ND

ND

2014, Toniato [18]

54

M

Severe hypertension

Bilateral adrenal grand

15 and 4

Benign

+

+

ND

1.5 years, disease-free

2004, Kunieda [16]

53

M

Swelling

Right kidney

14

Benign

+

3 years, disease-free

2015, Maki [The present case]

64

M

Asymptomatic

Liver and right kidney

7.5

Benign

+

1 year, disease-free

2009, Trabelsi [35]

55

M

Urinary symptom

Bladder

15

Benign

+

ND

5 years, disease-free

2000, Morimitsu [26]

72

F

ND

Left kidney

8

Benign

+

ND

10 months, disease-free

2001, Clayton [28]

17

F

Hip pain

Spinal column

15

Benign

+

ND

ND

4 years, disease-free

2004, Kume [30]

47

F

Pulsating mass

Superior mesenteric artery

4

Benign

+

ND

ND

1 year, disease-free

2008, Shin [34]

56

M

Asymptomatic

Left external iliac artery and psoas muscle

ND

Benign

+

ND

ND

8 days, discharged

2011, Savas [40]

60

M

Pain

Right kidney

4.5

Benign

+

ND

ND

1 year, disease-free

2013, Baldi [22]

46

F

ND

ND

ND

Benign

ND

ND

ND

13 years, metastasis (dead)

2008, Takizawa [23]

ND

F

Palpable mass

Left kidney

ND

Malignant

+

+

Disease-free

 

ND

M

Asymptomatic

ND

ND

Malignant

+

+

Disease-free

2007, Yamashita [33]

69

F

Swelling

Right kidney

14

Malignant

+

+

ND

2.2 years, disease-free

2011, Bae [38]

59

M

Asymptomatic

Gallbladder

22

Malignant

+

+

ND

3 years, disease-free

2012, Hata [42]

83

M

ND

ND

10

Malignant

+

+

ND

4 years, local recurrence (6 years, alive)

2008, Ito [27]

48

F

Leg edema

Left kidney

5.5

Malignant

+

+

2.5 years, disease-free

2009, Nomura [37]

27

F

Palpable mass and pain

Right latissimus dorsi muscle

11

Malignant

+

ND

6 months, disease-free

2002, Nakatani [29]

56

F

Palpable mass

Left kidney

9

Malignant

+

ND

ND

2.3 years, disease-free

2015, Kim [9]

52

F

Vaginal discharge

Sacrum

12

Malignant

+

ND

ND

3 years, disease-free

2009, Mosquera [24]

68

F

ND

ND

20

Malignant

ND

+

1 month, dead of disease

2004, Nagasako [31]

81

M

Ileus and palpable mass

Pelvis

18

ND

+

+

ND

ND

2005, Yamaguchi [32]

51

F

Pain

Left kidney

10

ND

+

+

ND

ND

2012, Aimé [20]

58

M

Palpable mass

Right kidney

20

ND

+

ND

ND

1 year, disease-free

2013, Nogami [14]

52

F

Emaciation

Pelvis

36

ND

+

ND

ND

Dead on arrival (autopsy case)

2013, Baldi [22]

41

M

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

23 years, local recurrence (dead)

The case order is sorted by morphological malignancy and findings of immunohistochemistry

ND not described

The present case showed prominent calcification in preoperative imaging and the excised mass mostly consisted of calcification with scattered tumor cells. Calcification is not rare for various neoplastic or non-neoplastic lesions in the retroperitoneum such as lipoma, liposarcoma, schwannoma, germ cell tumors, lymphoma after chemotherapy or radiotheraphy, and peritoneal pearl body [43, 44]. Nakashima et al. suggested that the absence of calcification can predict malignancy of primary retroperitoneal tumor [45]. In SFT, calcification was reported to be observed in 3 of 34 cases (8.8 %) [12] and regarded as an indicator of malignancy [46]. However, those kinds of calcification are tiny, scattered, or partial in the lesion. There has been no report of integrally calcified SFT like the present case. The reason why SFT coexisted with such significant calcification is not apparent but the fact is very interesting for considering carcinogenesis or nature of SFT.

Conclusions

We experienced a case of integrally calcified SFT in the retroperitoneum. There has been no report of SFT with such prominent calcification. Retroperitoneal SFT is difficult to diagnose preoperatively, and careful follow-up after the excision is crucial because morphological malignancy does not necessarily correspond to clinical malignancy.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

ND: 

not described

SFT: 

solitary fibrous tumor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Nobody is applied to acknowledgements.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Kushiro Red Cross Hospital
(2)
Department of Pathology, Kushiro Red Cross Hospital

References

  1. Klemperer P, Coleman BR. Primary neoplasms of the pleura. A report of five cases. Am J Ind Med. 1992;22:1–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Travis William D, Brambilia E, Muller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC. World Health Organization Classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics of tumors of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  3. Said JW, Nash G, Banks-Schlegel S, Sassoon AF, Shintaku IP. Localized fibrous mesothelioma. An immunohistochemical and electron microscopic study. Hum Pathol. 1984;15:440–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dervan PA, Tobin B, O’Conner M. Solitary (localized) fibrous mesothelioma. Evidence against mesothelial cell origin. Histopathology. 1986;10:867–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Thorgeirsson T, Isaksson HJ, Hardardottir H, Alfredsson H, Gudbjartsson T. Solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura: an estimation of population incidence. Chest. 2010;137:1005–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. de Perrot M, Fischer S, Bründler MA, Sekine Y, Keshavjee S. Solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:285–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Vallat-Decouvelaere AV, Dry SM, Fletcher CD. Atypical and malignant solitary fibrous tumors in extrathoracic locations: evidence of their comparability to intra-thoracic tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:1501–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hasegawa T, Matsuno Y, Shimoda T, Hasegawa F, Sano T, Hirohashi S. Extrathoracic solitary fibrous tumors: their histological variability and potentially aggressive behavior. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:1464–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim MY, Jeon S, Choi SD, Nam KH, Sunwoo JG, Lee JH. A case of solitary fibrous tumor in the pelvis presenting massive hemorrhage during surgery. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015;58:73–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fukasawa Y, Takada A, Tateno M, Sato H, Koizumi M, Tanaka A, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura causing recurrent hypoglycemia by secretion of insulin-like growth factor II. Pathol Int. 1998;48:47–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Maeda S, Sugita M, Sagawa M, Ueda Y, Sakuma T. Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura suddenly induced hypoglycemia before surgical treatment. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;17:293–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wignall OJ, Moskovic EC, Thway K, Thomas JM. Solitary fibrous tumors of the soft tissues: review of the imaging and clinical features with histopathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:W55–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wakisaka N, Kondo S, Murono S, Minato H, Furukawa M, Yoshizaki T. A solitary fibrous tumor arising in the parapharyngeal space, with MRI and FDG-PET findings. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009;36:367–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nogami M, Hoshi T, Toukairin Y, Arai T, Uozaki H, Fukusato T. A case of the large retroperitoneal solitary fibrous tumor. Leg Med. 2013;15:19–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Turgut M, Akyüz O, Ozsunar Y, Kacar F. Sponge-induced granuloma (“gauzoma”) as a complication of posterior lumbar surgery. Neurol Med Chir. 2005;45:209–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kunieda K, Tanaka Y, Nagao N, Yamaguchi K, Sano J, Osada S, et al. Large solitary fibrous tumor of the retroperitoneum: report of a case. Surg Today. 2004;34:90–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. England DM, Hochholzer L, McCarthy MJ. Localized benign and malignant fibrous tumors of the pleura. A clinicopathologic review of 223 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13:640–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Toniato A, Boschin IM, Pelizzo MR. A very rare bilateral adrenal tumor. Endocrine. 2014;45:502–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodlad JR, Fletcher CD. Solitary fibrous tumour arising at unusual sites: analysis of a series. Histopathology. 1991;19:515–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Aimé A, Lefèvre JH, Svrcek M, Terrier P, Tiret E, Balladur P. Solitary fibrous tumor of the retroperitoneum: case report and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2012;43:226–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Cristi E, Perrone G, Battista C, Benedetti-Panici P, Rabitti C. A rare case of solitary fibrous tumour of the pre-sacral space: morphological and immunohistochemical features. In Vivo. 2005;19:777–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Baldi GG, Stacchiotti S, Mauro V, Dei Tos AP, Gronchi A, Pastorino U, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor of all sites: outcome of late recurrences in 14 patients. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2013;3:4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Takizawa I, Saito T, Kitamura Y, Arai K, Kawaguchi M, Takahashi K, et al. Primary solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) in the retroperitoneum. Urol Oncol. 2008;26:254–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mosquera JM, Fletcher CD. Expanding the spectrum of malignant progression in solitary fibrous tumors: a study of 8 cases with a discrete anaplastic component--is this dedifferentiated SFT? Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:1314–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yokoi T, Tsuzuki T, Yatabe Y, Suzuki M, Kurumaya H, Koshikawa T, et al. Solitary fibrous tumour: significance of p53 and CD34 immunoreactivity in its malignant transformation. Histopathology. 1998;32:423–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Morimitsu Y, Nakajima M, Hisaoka M, Hashimoto H. Extrapleural solitary fibrous tumor: clinicopathologic study of 17 cases and molecular analysis of the p53 pathway. APMIS. 2000;108:617–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ito H, Fukuda M, Imamura Y, Fuse H. A malignant solitary fibrous tumor in the retroperitoneum. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:173–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Clayton AC, Salomão DR, Keeney GL, Nascimento AG. Solitary fibrous tumor: a study of cytologic features of six cases diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;25:172–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakatani T, Tamada S, Iwai Y, Tanimoto Y. Solitary fibrous tumor in the retroperitoneum: a case with infiltrative growth. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2002;48:637–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kume M, Komori K, Inoguchi H, Shoji T, Furuyama T, Sakamoto A, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor in the retroperitoneal space: report of a case. Surg Today. 2002;32:1099–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagasako Y, Misawa K, Kohashi S, Sano H. Solitary fibrous tumor in the retroperitoneum. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:322–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Yamaguchi T, Takimoto T, Yamashita T, Kitahara S, Omura M, Ueda Y. Fat-containing variant of solitary fibrous tumor (lipomatous hemangiopericytoma) arising on surface of kidney. Urology. 2005;65:175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yamashita S, Tochigi T, Kawamura S, Aoki H, Tateno H, Kuwahara M. Case of retroperitoneal solitary fibrous tumor. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2007;53:477–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shin SS, Jeong YY, Kang HK. Myxoid solitary fibrous tumor of the retroperitoneum: MRI findings with the pathologic correlation. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:279–82.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Trabelsi A, Hammedi F, Rammeh S, Abdelkrim SB, Yacoub-Abid LB, Beïzig N, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor with giant multinucleated cells in the retroperitoneum—a case report. N Am J Med Sci. 2009;1:285–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lau SK, Weiss LM, Chu PG. Myxoid solitary fibrous tumor: a clinicopathologic study of three cases. Virchows Arch. 2009;454:189–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nomura T, Satoh R, Kashima K, Yamasaki M, Hirai K, Satoh F, et al. A case of large solitary fibrous tumor in the retroperitoneum. Clin Med Case Rep. 2009;2:21–5.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bae JM, Kim SW, Kim SW, Song SK. Malignant solitary fibrous tumor of retroperitoneum mimicking gastric submucosal tumor. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2011;57:47–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Charhi H, Bernoussi Z, Haddan A, Mesmoudi S, Elktaibi A, Mansouri F, et al. Primary solitary fibrous tumor of the retroperitoneum. Clin Pract. 2011;1:e137.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Savas M, Ciftci H, Ozgonul A, Sogut O, Guldur ME. An incidental solitary fibrous tumour in the retroperitoneum, coexisting with ipsilateral atrophic kidney. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61:909–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Azadi J, Subhawong A, Durand DJ. F-18 FDG PET/CT and Tc-99m sulfur colloid SPECT imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of a case of dual solitary fibrous tumors of the retroperitoneum and pancreas. J Radiol Case Rep. 2012;6:32–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Hata T, Tsuruta Y, Takamori S, Shishikura Y. Non-islet cell tumor hypoglycemia at the second recurrence of malignant solitary fibrous tumor in the retroperitoneum and pelvis: a case report. Case Rep Oncol. 2012;5:420–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hayasaka K, Yamada T, Saitoh Y, Yoshikawa D, Aburano T, Hashimoto H, et al. CT evaluation of primary benign retroperitoneal tumor. Radiat Med. 1994;12:115–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Acar T, Harman M, Guneyli S, Gemici K, Efe D, Guler I, et al. Cross-sectional imaging features of primary retroperitoneal tumors and their subsequent treatment. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2015;5:24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Nakashima J, Ueno M, Nakamura K, Tachibana M, Baba S, Deguchi N, et al. Differential diagnosis of primary benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors. Int J Urol. 1997;4:441–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Li JP, Xie CM, Zhang R, Li H, Liu XW, Zhang Y, et al. Imaging features and clinicopathological manifestations of solitary fibrous tumors. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2010;32:363–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Maki et al. 2016