Skip to main content

Table 2 Forty-five cases with De Garengeot hernia reported in Japanese literature

From: Clinicopathological characteristics of De Garengeot hernia: six case reports and literature review

Age

Median 77 (IQR 71–83)

Male:Female

7:38

Body mass index

Median 20.4 (IQR 18.1–21.7)

Laterality of hernia (right:left)

45:0

Symptom

 

 Groin mass

35 (78%)

 Groin pain

22 (49%)

 Abdominal pain

5 (11%)

 Bowel obstruction

2 (4%)

White blood cell count (/μL)

9052 ± 4075

C-reactive protein (mg/dL)

2.2 (IQR 0.4–6.5)

Correct preoperative diagnosis

21 (47%)

Diagnostic modalities

 

 CT

38 (84%)

 US

23 (51%)

 X-p

2 (4%)

 MRI

1 (2%)

Surgical emergency

 

 Emergent

37 (88%)

 Elective

5 (12%)

Surgical procedure

 

 McVay

19 (43%)

 Mesh and plug

7 (16%)

 Kugel patch

4 (9%)

 Suture of the femoral canal

4 (9%)

 Prolene hernia system/ultrapro hernia system

3 (7%)

 Transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP)

2 (5%)

 Totally extraperitoneal approach

2 (5%)

 Staged surgery (mesh/TAPP)

2 (5%)

 Moschcowitz repair

1 (2%)

Intraoperative findings

 

 Periappendiceal abscess

10 (22%)

 Appendiceal perforation

4 (9%)

Appendiceal pathology

 

 Congestion\Ischemia

9 (20%)

 Catarrhal appendicitis

8 (18%)

 Phlegmonous appendicitis

7 (16%)

 Gangrenous appendicitis

20 (44%)

 Chronic appendicitis

1 (2%)

Postoperative complication

 

 Surgical site infection

6 (13%)

 Sepsis

1 (2%)

Postoperative hospital stay (days)

Median 9 (IQR 7–12)