Table 3 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of five patients with hepatic sclerosed hemangioma
From: Hepatic sclerosed hemangioma with special attention to diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Case | Border | Fatty tissue | T1-weighted T2-weighted | Dynamic MRI findings | ADC mean (×10–3 mm2/s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fat-suppressed T1-weighted | Early phase | Late phase | Hepatocyte phase | Degenerative area | Non-degenerative area | ||||
Case 1 | Lobulated shape | – | Hypo Hyper | Hypo | Ring enhancement | Progressive centripetal fill-in | Defect | 1.65 | 1.80 |
1.56 | 1.61 | ||||||||
1.75 | 2.00 | ||||||||
Case 2 | Lobulated shape | – | Hypo Hyper | Hypo | Peripheral nodular enhancement | Progressive centripetal fill-in | Defect | 1.87 | 1.80 |
1.80 | 1.86 | ||||||||
1.93 | 1.72 | ||||||||
Case 3 | Lobulated shape | – | Hypo Hyper | Hypo | Ring enhancement | Progressive centripetal fill-in | Defect | 2.07 | – |
2.16 | |||||||||
2.09 | |||||||||
Case 4 | Lobulated shape | – | Hypo Hyper | Hypo | Ring enhancement | Hypo | Defect | 2.00 | – |
1.93 | |||||||||
1.96 | |||||||||
Case 5* | Lobulated shape | – | Hypo Hyper | Hypo | Peripheral nodular enhancement | Iso-hypo | Defect | 1.94 | 2.23 |
1.95 | 2.12 | ||||||||
1.90 | 2.38 | ||||||||