Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of cases of intrascrotal lipoblastoma in the literature

From: Intrascrotal lipoblastoma: report of a case and the review of literature

Patient Authors Year Age Side AFP (ng/ml) β hCG (UI/L) Preoperative image findings Preoperative diagnosis Approach Treatment Size of tumor (cm × cm × cm)
1 Arda et al. 1993 15 months Left N.A N.A N.A N.A Inguinal Mass excision 6.5 × 4 × 3
2 Turner et al. 1998 9 months Left 11 1.8 US: lobulated solid lesion with well-defined margin. N.A Inguinal Mass excision 5 × 2.5 × 1.5
3 Chun 2001 18 months N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A 2.3 × 2 × 1.3
4 Somers et al. 2004 7 months Left N.A N.A US: heterogeneous mass consisting of small cystic areas admixed with solid components. N.A Inguinal Mass excision 14 × 14 × 8a
5 Dy et al. 2007 4 years N.A. N.A N.A N.A N.A Inguinal Mass excision 3.5 × 2 × 2
6 Del Sordo et al. 2007 4 years Right N.A N.A N.A N.A Inguinal Mass excision 2 × 1.2 × 0.8
7 Robb et al. 2010 10 months Left N N US: echogenic mass with good vascularity, separate to the testis. RMS Inguinal Orchidectomy and Mass excision 3 × 2.5 × 1.5
8 Kamel et al. 2011 4 months Right N.A N.A US and CT: large fatty tumor. Lipoblastoma Inguinal Mass excision 10 × 9 × 7
9 Nakib et al. 2013 10 years Right N N US: a hyper-echoic lesion above the upper pole of the testicle. N.A N.A Mass excision 5 × 5 × 1.5
10 Eyssartier et al. 2013 15 months Left 17 4 US: echogenic solid lesion with well-defined margin. N.A Inguinal Mass excision 2 × 1.5 × 1
11 Eyssartier et al. 2013 16 months Right 7.8 <1 US: an echogenic mass. N.A Inguinal Mass excision 1.5 × 1.5 × 2
12 Present case 2015 19 months Right 6.0 225 US: hyper-echoic lobulated mass with well-circumscribed margin. CT: less enhanced mass. MRI: TI high/low, T2 high. Lipoblastoma Scrotal Mass excision 6 × 4 × 3, 3.5 × 2 × 2
  1. N.A not available; N normal; US ultrasonography; RMS rhabdomyosarcoma
  2. aIn this case, the other two residual lesions were removed postoperatively