Open Access

Efficacy of nonsurgical tigecycline pleurodesis for the management of hepatic hydrothorax in patients with liver cirrhosis

  • Nevin Yilmaz1Email author,
  • Arife Zeybek2,
  • Benjamin Tharian3 and
  • Ugur Eser Yilmaz4
Surgical Case Reports20151:62

DOI: 10.1186/s40792-015-0049-x

Received: 28 November 2014

Accepted: 28 May 2015

Published: 12 August 2015

Abstract

Chemical pleurodesis is one of the therapeutic tools to control hepatic hydrothorax. Tetracycline and derivatives have been widely accepted as an effective and safe treatment for the purpose, but availability is the big concern. Tigecycline is an antibiotic derivative of tetracycline, which has demonstrated to be an effective pleurodesing agent in animal models. The aim of the study was to document two successful tigecycline pleurodesis in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, who were not candidates for liver transplantation. Both patients were undergoing palliative treatment for cirrhosis and developed massive pleural effusion on the right side. They underwent chemical pleurodesis in the first instance. Diagnostic thoracocentesis was done to rule out differentials and to confirm the clinical suspicion, following which, complete drainage of pleural fluids was achieved. Tigecycline of 3 mg/kg was instilled intrapleurally via the thoracic catheter, as per the protocol. The medical records and images were thoroughly reviewed. There was no recurrence of the effusion for at least 3 months, with no detected complications in the short- or long-term follow-up. In conclusion, pleurodesis with tigecycline seems to be effective and safe for the management of symptomatic hepatic hydrothorax and should therefore be promoted in the setting of liver cirrhosis at least for a short-term relief, especially in patients who do not meet the criteria for liver transplantation.

Background

Pleural effusion is a relatively uncommon complication of end-stage liver disease, which occurs in less than 10 % of the patients, typically located on the right side in approximately 70–80 % of the cases. Although right-sided pleural effusion can develop in the absence of significant ascites, coexisting ascites is normally present. The negative intrathoracic pressure draws ascitic fluid into the pleural space via the multiple natural defects in the diaphragm, like the “Pores of Kohn” [16].

Fluid analysis and complications will show characteristics similar to abdominal ascites. Although the treatment of hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is similar to the treatment of ascites, more invasive procedures including thoracocentesis that rarely have undesirable outcomes are sometimes needed. In refractory patients with HH, repetitive thoracocentesis can be performed in selected patients but always carries risk for pneumothorax and contamination [79].

The patient with recurrent or large-volume hydrothorax who is unresponsive to diuretics, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can serve as a bridge to liver transplantation. Surgical closure of diaphragmatic defects has been also proposed, but the increased morbidity and mortality of these complex procedures require careful consideration of risk versus benefit [1015].

Chemical pleurodesis with chest drainage is another treatment option to be strongly considered to give a good palliation to these patients. As is already known, the irritants cause reaction between the parietal and visceral layers of the pleura, which closes off the space between them and prevents further fluid from accumulating. On the other hand, the technique can sometimes be challenging to achieve pleurodesis in HH because of the rapid fluid accumulation [16, 17].

To date, a large number of chemicals were considered to induce pleurodesis in malignant or non-malignant effusions. Although talc, tetracycline derivatives, OK-432, bleomycin, or povidone–iodine are the most commonly used agents for liver-related pleurodesis, availability, side effects, and variable results are still major concerns [16, 1825].

There are ongoing animal studies with different sclerosing agents. Tigecycline is the first drug in the glycylcycline class (group 3) of tetracyclines that is available for intravenous infusion with broader spectrum cover. The structure of the drug is very similar to minocycline and similarly binds to the bacterial 30S ribosome unit. The main difference between tigecycline and minocycline is the addition of an N,N-dimethylglycylamido group. Given the molecular differences, tetracycline galactosidase (TG) has pharmacokinetic distinction consistent with increased distribution and concentration in human tissue beyond the plasma volume. This indicates tigecycline penetrates with higher concentration in the pleural surfaces. Daddi and friends reported effectiveness of tigecycline pleurodesis in animal models, recently [2628]. However, there is no published human study with tigecycline as a pleurodesing agent that we could find during our literature search. Our institute has historically used tetracycline derivatives to induce pleurodesis. We aim to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of tigecycline pleurodesis, in patients with cirrhosis who are not transplant candidates.

Case presentation

Case 1

A 63-year-old man with cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis B infection was admitted to the hospital, based on the abnormal chest X-ray performed by gastroenterologist on his regular follow-up visits.

He had chronic symptoms of underlying liver disease, fatigue, abdominal swelling with ankle edema, cough, and exertional dyspnea. On further questioning, he reported worsening dyspnea over the past 5 to 6 weeks.

His past medical history was significant for bilateral inguinal hernia operation and COPD related to smoking. The liver disease was diagnosed in 2003, complicated with portal hypertension (esophageal varices (previously banded) and gastric varices) and ascites, which needed frequent paracentesis. He is on entecavir since 2010 and seroconverted but withdrawn from the transplant list due to portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which he developed recently. The other medications included furosemide, spironolactone, propranolol, proton-pump inhibitor, Osmolac, inhaled beta agonist (formoterol), and anticholinergics (ipratropium). Large-volume paracentesis with albumin infusion was performed as and when needed.

On physical examination, vital signs were T 37 °C, BP 120/70 mmHg, P 90/min, RR 25 cycles/min, and O2 sat 95 % in room air. General appearance was remarkable with pallor and mild respiratory distress. Abnormal findings on physical examination were bilateral pitting ankle edema, spider nevi, palmar erythema, jugular venous distension with one-sixth systolic murmur at apex, gynecomastia, decreased breath sounds along with dullness to percussion on two thirds of the right lung, and mild to moderate ascites with no flapping tremor.

The initial work-up was as follows: CBC, PT/APTT, LFT, electrolytes, and CXR. The other tests including fluid analyses are summarized in the tables. Other imaging including abdominal ultrasound, Doppler study, CT chest, and echocardiography were also obtained as part of the work-up of the right-sided effusion (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1

Laboratory results of the patients

 

Case 1

Case 2

Before pleurodesis

After pleurodesis, first 2 weeks (median)

Late follow-up

Before pleurodesis

After pleurodesis, first 2 weeks (median)

Late follow-up

CBC

  WBC, 103/mm3

3

1.6a

4.4

5.9

7.1

4.4

  Hb, g/dl

10.3

8.6a

11.3

10

10.6

9.4

  Plt, 103/mm3

49

32

34

150

158

114

INR, range (0.8–1.2)

1.49

2.2a

1.6

1.14

1.19

1.17

AST/ALT, IU/l

59/47

50/30

68/77

36/127

23/17

26/13

GGT/AP, IU/l

17/97

12/71

47/81

26/81

37/127

36/85

T.bil/D.bil, mg/dl

2.1/0.63

2.2/ 0.4

3.74/1.07

1.08/0.3

1.1/0.2

1.4/0.39

Albumin, g/dl

2

2.3

2.4

2.6

2.7

3

Creatinine, mg/dl

0.6

0.57

0.6

0.7

0.7

0.7

Na, mEq/l

134

133

132

141

133

140

MELD score

14

18a

17

9

9

9

CTP class

B

B

B

A

A

A

Abbreviations: CBC complete blood count, INR international normalized ratio, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, GGT gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, AP alkaline phosphatase, Na sodium, K potassium, CTP Child–Turcotte–Pugh, MELD model for end-stage liver disease, Plt platelet, T.bil total bilirubin, D.bil direct bilirubin

aPathologic changes

Table 2

Pleural fluid and diagnostic studies

Findings

Case 1

Case 2

Pleural fluid

  WBC, 103/mm3

150

100

  Pleural/serum protein (ratio)

<0.5

<0.5

  SPAG

>1

>1

  Pleural LDH, IU/l

NA

49

  Culture

Negative

Negative

  Cytology

Negative

Negative

Tigecycline doses, total (mg)

150

200

Pleural drainage

  Before the PL, ml

2050

3500

  Following PL, ml

600

500

  Duration of drainage, days

10

14

Abdominal ultrasonography

Right massive pleural effusion with atelectasis left kidney stone (6 mm); liver: contour nodular, coarsened echo texture, C/RL >7, SM; ascites

Bilateral pleural effusion (right > left); liver: irregular external contour SM; minimal ascites

Doppler ultrasound following pleurodesis

Liver: contour nodular, coarsened echo texture SM, collaterals in the perisplenic region, portal venous thrombosis

Liver, coarsened echo texture, SM, patent vascular structure

Echocardiography

EF 55 %, 1° TR, 1° MR, left ventricular hypertrophy

EF 65 %, 1° TR, left atrial dilatation, aortic valve, and mitral annular calcification

Abbreviations: LDH lactate dehydrogenase, SPAG serum–pleural fluid albumin gradient, EF ejection fraction, TR tricuspid regurgitation, MR mitral regurgitation, C/RL caudate–right lobe ratio, PL pleurodesis, NA not available

Case 2

A 76-year-old female was brought to the emergency room with a history of worsening dyspnea. She was found to have massive right-sided pleural effusion and hence was admitted to thoracic surgery ward.

Past medical history was remarkable for umbilical hernia repair in the 1980s, large hiatal hernia with Cameron ulcers, rheumatoid arthritis, and COPD. A kidney stone and thyroid nodule were diagnosed during the current admission. Cryptogenic cirrhosis was diagnosed in 2009 complicated with portal hypertension (esophageal varices banded once) and minimal ascites (never tapped) but underwent pleural drainages secondary to HH twice in the past 2 months. She has not been listed for transplant because of the age and low model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. She was on Ursofalk, spironolactone, propranolol, and proton-pump inhibitor. Intravenous acetyl cysteine, albuterol, and budesonide nebules with continuous low-dose oxygen inhalation were added in the current hospitalization.

On physical examination, vital signs were T 37.2 °C, BP 130/90 mmHg, P 72/min, and O2 sat 86 % in room air. General appearance was noticeable with pallor, respiratory distress improving on sitting position, and cough on exertion. Abnormal findings were spider nevi, jugular venous dilatation, and decreased breath sounds with dullness to percussion on the right side. Swan neck deformities of the digits, incisional hernia, and doubtful ascites were the other accompanied findings.

The diagnostic tests and images are summarized below (Tables 1 and 2). Schirmer’s test (4 mm/5 mm in 5 min) and rheumatoid factor were also positive.

Tigecycline pleurodesis

Imaging studies confirmed right-sided free-flowing pleural effusion and the aspirated fluid characteristic of transudate in both patients (Figs. 1a and 2a, Table 2). Patients were consented for chest drain insertion and pleurodesis with tigecycline as per institution protocol, after getting ethical committee approval. Ultrasound-guided therapeutic thoracocentesis was performed with a posterior intercostal approach with the patient seated, after the tissue at the entry site was anesthetized, a small incision was made, and an 18-gauge needle was directed into the pleural space. The needle was exchanged over the wire and 12-F tubes were connected to a drainage bag via a stopcock to perform gravity drain. The tube was intermittently clamped for 2 h to interrupt free drainage, to reduce the risk of re-expansion pulmonary edema. A total of 2050 ml from case 1 and 3500 ml from case 2 were obtained at the end of 3 days. Once the drainage dropped to <100 ml in a 24-h period and re-expansion of the lung was documented by chest X-ray, 3 mg/kg of tigecycline (diluted with 100 ml of saline) was instilled into the pleural space. Following the pleurodesis, the tube was clamped for 6 h and then unclamped. Once outputs were below 100 ml daily, they were clamped again.
Fig. 1

Chest X ray—case 1. a Initial chest X ray prior to treatment: large, right-sided pleural effusion. b Three months after the pleurodesis

Fig. 2

Chest X ray—case 2. a Initial chest X ray prior to treatment: massive right pleural effusion with shift of mediastinum towards left. b Ten weeks after the pleurodesis. c Five months after the pleurodesis

The tubes remained 10 and 14 days in the patients with a total quantity of 500 and 600 ml fluid drainage, respectively. Meanwhile, the lungs had completely re-expanded and pleurodesis did not have to be repeated in the cases.

During the procedures and following days, the patients received prophylactic antibiotic therapy (intravenous ceftriaxone). Albumin infusion and diuretic doses were also tailored as was appropriate. None of the patients had experienced compensatory ascites accumulation following the procedures.

Follow-up

The patients experienced symptomatic improvement initially, and the procedures were tolerated without giving pain medication. During the following first 3 weeks, case 1 experienced drop in WBC–Hb and rise in international normalized ratio (INR) levels, temporarily (Table 1). During the initial few weeks, the median WBC was 1.6 103/mm3 (range 1.31 to 2.7 103/mm3) and Hb was 8.6 mg/dl (range 8.6–9.8 mg/dl). The patient needed 1 unit red blood cell transfusion. The median INR was 2.2 (range 1.6 to 2.2) and MELD score was 18. During the following 3 months, none of the patients experienced recurrence of effusions (Figs. 1b and 2b, c).

Discussion

Hepatic hydrothorax is defined as a transudative pleural effusion, usually greater than 500 ml in patients with portal hypertension, without any other underlying primary lung diseases or alternative explanation for the same. Bilateral effusion develops in only 2–3 % patients and 20 % occurs without significant ascites. The pathogenesis of pleural fluid becomes complex in these patients. Therefore, some difficulties to establish therapeutic guidelines persist. Twenty percent of patients with HH are refractory to medical treatment and warrant consideration of invasive procedures as summarized before. Liver transplantation is the only one radical treatment, but most of the patients are not eligible for transplant like the cases discussed in the article or die while on waiting list. Consequently, thoracocentesis with or without pleurodesis, repair of diaphragmatic defects, and TIPS procedures have been proposed in the literatures [15].

In the presentation, both patients had massive pleural effusion on the right side. Case 1 had ascites with bilateral minimal pleural fluid reported previously in the sonographic examination which was not apparent in the chest X-ray. The other case had recurrent large fluid accumulations at the same location in a short time period (<2 months) without history of ascites. Like the first patient, she also had bilateral minimal effusion, only on ultrasonography. Neither had evidence of major defects in the diaphragms confirmed by thorax CTs. The clinical conditions showed they will not tolerate either repeated thoracentesis or any surgical procedures. We planned pleurodesis following diagnostic paracentesis and consented for the same.

Tigecycline is structurally similar to tetracycline class of antibiotics but has activity against many pathogens resistant to tetracyclines. Due to the special molecular structure, tigecycline has a highest steady-state volume of distribution (7 to 9 l/kg), higher in vitro plasma protein binding capacity (ranges from 71 to 79 %), and longest half-life with 36 h among the tetracyclines [27]. These characteristics indicate that tigecycline binds more tightly with higher concentration in the pleural surfaces with result of prolonged inflammation duration and higher sclerosant rate. Side effects are also similar to tetracyclines including photosensitivity, pseudotumor cerebri, and anti-anabolic action (which have led to increased BUN, acidosis, and hyperphosphatemia). As with tetracyclines, pancreatitis has been reported with the use of tigecycline. The recommended dose for the drug as an antibiotic is an initial dose of 100 mg followed by 50 mg every 12 h and the duration guided by the severity and the site of the infection. Fifty-nine percent of drug is eliminated by biliary/fecal excretion and 33 % in urine. No significant difference following tigecycline exposure was observed between healthy elderly subjects and youth, following a single 100-mg dose of tigecycline. But in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child–Pugh C), dosage adjustment is arranted [26]. In the animal study, pleurodesis effect was apparent from 3 mg/kg and was dose dependent [28].

Both patients were older with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. Therefore, 3 mg/kg tigecycline was preferred. The procedures were well tolerated and metabolic tests remained within normal limits. Only case 1 with moderate (Child–Pugh B) liver cirrhosis experienced decrease in WBC below the 2 103/mm3, and the prolonged INR (>2) was reversible after 2–3 weeks of treatment. In animal models, reversible bone marrow hypocellularity was recorded with tigecycline at exposures of 8–10 times the human dose. In clinical trials, anemia was observed in 5 % of patients [26]. Therefore, it is difficult to initiate the tigecycline therapy and bone marrow toxicity with a single-dose adjustment.

Singh and friends compared the management of HH and their results in the review [22]. Advanced thoracic procedures were used in almost all subjects, and follow-up durations were longer than our cases. Only two studies had follow-up limited to 3 months, but overall success rates were 75 and 67 % [15, 24]. In those studies, medical thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were used for pleurodesis and radiographic disappearance of fluid was defined as a success [15, 24]. In the first study, talc, vibramycin, and povidone–iodine were used as chemical agents and applied via medical thoracoscopy. Similar to the first case, all patients were in CTP class B. Differently, somatostatin was infused and pleurodesis was repeated at least once in all patients. The mean duration of drainage was 9.8 days (range 4–17 days), recurrence rate was 20 %, and complications range was 4 to 20 % [15].

In the second 3-month study, talc was applied using VATS or VATS with mechanical abrasion [24]. The recurrence rate was 25 % and the patients were re-treated with tetracycline. The maximum duration of post-pleurodesis drainage was longer (range 5–29 days) than our cases.

These results suggest that tigecycline pleurodesis was successfully achieved in these cases and they remained asymptomatic and hydrothorax free for 3 months follow-up. Only case 1 had temporarily hematologic and coagulation abnormalities. One of the disadvantages of the drug is a high commercial price. But compared to talc, easy biodegradability of the molecule makes the tigecycline available for using several times in the same patients with safety [27, 28]. The extent of talc systemically absorbed after intrapleural administration has not been adequately studied, and mutagenicity is not clear [29]. Among the tetracyclines, TG is the only one with IV form nationwide [27]. Therefore, tigecycline should be selected fairly as a pleurodesis agent based on the balance of clinical effect and cost benefits.

Conclusions

In conclusion, pleurodesis with tigecycline is an effective and safe procedure in patients with hepatic hydrothorax. Long-term studies are necessary to define the optimal therapeutic guidelines, effectiveness, and side effects.

Consent

The signed approval (informed consent) of the patients was received before the procedure.

Declarations

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Transplant Hepatology, Mugla University School of Medicine
(2)
Thoracic Surgery, Mugla University School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, NWAHS
(4)
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medicine School (RCSI) / Graduate Entry Program

References

  1. Zetterman RK. Pulmonary complications of cirrhosis. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/777530. 2013.
  2. Kim YK, Kim Y, Shim SS. Thoracic complications of liver cirrhosis: radiologic findings. Radiographics. 2009;29:825–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Porcel JM, Mas E, Reñé JM, Bielsa S. Hepatic hydrothorax: retrospective analysis of a series of 77 patients. Med Clin (Barc). 2013 Sep 6. doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2013.06.017. [Epub ahead of print]. Abstract.
  4. Krok KL, Cardenas A. Hepatic hydrothorax. Semin Resp Crit Care Med. 2012;33:3–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Garcia N, Mihas AA. Hepatic hydrothorax: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;38:52–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang PM, Chang YL, Yang CY, Lee YC. The morphology of diaphragmatic defects in hepatic hydrothorax: thoracoscopic finding. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(1):141–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes TW, Morgenthaler TI, Olson EJ, Hesley GK, Decker PA, Ryu JH. Sonographically guided thoracentesis and rate of pneumothorax. http://www.slredultrasound.com/Filesandpictures/Lung11.pdf. 2013.
  8. Nathan J, Richard N, Chris H, Darcy M. Thoracentesis complication rates on the medical clinical teaching unit: does ultrasonography make a difference? Chest. 2011;140:497A. No. 4-meeting—abstracts.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Brauner ME, Thoracentesis http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/80640-overview#aw2aab6b4. 2013.
  10. Dhanasekaran R, West JK, Gonzales PC, Subramanian R, Parekh S, Spivey JR, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for symptomatic refractory hepatic hydrothorax in patients with cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(3):635–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wilputte JY, Goffette P, Zech F, Godoy-Gepert A, Geubel A. The outcome after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for hepatic hydrothorax is closely related to liver dysfunction: a long-term study in 28 patients. Acta Gastroent Belg. 2007;70(1):6–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Syed MI, Karsan H, Ferral H, Shaikh A, Waheed U, Akhter T, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt in the elderly: palliation for complications of portal hypertension. World J Hepatol. 2012;4(2):35–42.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaba RC, Khiatani VL, Owens CA. Comprehensive review of tips technical complications and how to avoid them. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:675–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. LeVeen HH, Piccone VA, Hutto RB. Management of ascites with hydrothorax. Am J Surg. 1984;148(2):210–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Luh SP, Chen CY. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of hepatic hydrothorax: report of twelve cases. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009;10:547–51.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Light RW. Pleurodesis: what agent should be used? J Pneumologia. 2003;29(2):53–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Rodriguez-Panadero F, Montes-Worboys A. Mechanisms of pleurodesis. Respiration. 2012;83(2):91–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. Efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with talc pleurodesis for porous diaphragm syndrome in patients with refractory hepatic hydrothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(2):457–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Falchuk KR, Jacoby I, Colucci WS, Rybak ME. Tetracycline-induced pleural symphysis for recurrent hydrothorax complicating cirrhosis. A new approach to treatment. Gastroenterology. 1977;72:319–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin CC, Wu JC, Chang SC, Huang YH, Huo TI, Chang FY, et al. Resolution of refractory hepatic hydrothorax after chemical pleurodesis with minocycline. Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi (Taipei). 2000;63:704–9.Google Scholar
  21. Goto T, Oyamada Y, Hamaguchi R, Shimizu K, Kubota M, Akanabe K, et al. Remission of hepatic hydrothorax after OK-432 pleurodesis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;17(2):208–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh A, Bajwa A, Shujaat A. Evidence-based review of the management of hepatic hydrothorax. Respiration. 2013;86(2):155–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu WL, Kuo PH, Ku SC, Huang PM, Yang PC. Impact of therapeutic interventions on survival of patients with hepatic hydrothorax. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010;109(8):582–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Helmy N, Akl Y, Kaddah S, Hafiz HA, Makhzangy HE. A case series: Egyptian experience in using chemical pleurodesis as an alternative management in refractory hepatic hydrothorax. Arch Med Sci. 2010;6(3):336–42.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee WJ, Kim HJ, Park JH, Park DI, Cho YK, Sohn CI, et al. Chemical pleurodesis for the management of refractory hepatic hydrothorax in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Korean J Hepatol. 2011;17(4):292–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. TYGACIL® (tigecycline) i.v.injectionlabel–AccessdataFDA http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/021821s021lbl.pdf.2013
  27. Agwuh KN, MacGowan A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the tetracyclines including glycylcyclines. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(2):256–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Daddi N, Vannucci J, Maggio C, Giontella A, Bravi I, Marziani F, et al. Efficacy of tigecycline pleurodesis: a comparative experimental study. J Surg Res. 2011;169(2):e109–18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. SCLEROSOL® intrapleural aerosol (sterile talc powder)—AccessdataFDA http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/020587s006lbl.pdf.2015

Copyright

© Yilmaz et al. 2015